1 posted on
06/10/2004 12:50:24 PM PDT by
SJackson
To: SJackson
It is much too political and is doing a disservice to science and the community.
2 posted on
06/10/2004 12:52:40 PM PDT by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: SJackson
Wesley J. Smith, is a senior fellow at the Discovery InstituteRuh roh. Agenda, anyone? Yeesh.
3 posted on
06/10/2004 12:54:35 PM PDT by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: SJackson
4 posted on
06/10/2004 12:55:01 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(You need tons click "co-ordinating")
To: SJackson; All
WHY does everyone seem to be falling for the left's let's-you-and-him-fight policy on stem cells? Reagan dies, and some cynics in the press see a great opportunity to pit conservatives against conservatives...and we jump at it, in Reagan's name, no less!
WHY does the issue need to be hashed out this week?
To: SJackson
Adult brain stem cells could be studied as well.
To: SJackson
21 posted on
06/10/2004 7:53:20 PM PDT by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: MHGinTN; hocndoc
some arguments on this thread
23 posted on
06/11/2004 8:25:35 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: narses
To: SJackson
Tonight, on MSNBC, following Pres. Reagan's evening funeral, I heard Chris Matthews, Pat Buchanan, and Howard Finemann (I think) discussing what kind of asset Nancy Reagan would be to the Republicans given her stance on stem cell research. Besides the utter callousness of their comments, I had heard earlier on the news about the Wash Post article (Britt Hume, I believe). Sure enough I find this post confirming that Nancy Reagan is being lied to.
To use Nancy Reagan's grief and Pres. Reagan's illness in this way is beyond contemptible.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson