Posted on 06/04/2004 1:30:42 PM PDT by Steven W.
Job growth for May comes in strong, but not strong enough to reignite interest-rate fears. Mild rally pushes all three major indexes into the plus side for the week. Techs lead after Intel's strong mid-quarter update.
The labor market is back, and that news along with a strong mid-quarter forecast from semiconductor king Intel have the market looking strong at midday.
Non-farm payrolls jumped 248,000 in May, while the unemployment rate held steady at 5.6%, the government reported this morning.
From the Street's vantage point, the payroll increase was a "Goldilocks" number -- not too cold, not too hot. The jobs picture was a little better than expected, and it was the third straight monthly report saying jobs are coming back.
"Economists say this third strong job report in a row is a definitive sign the job market has turned around," CNBC economics reporter Steve Liesman said.
(Excerpt) Read more at moneycentral.msn.com ...
DOW 10,242.82 +46.91
NASDAQ 1,978.62 +18.36
S&P 1,122.51 +5.87
July 2000 - "Bush has no right to say the economy is headed toward recession. It's the strongest ever!"
July 2002 - "This is the worst economy since man came down out of the trees"
July 2003 - "This is the weakest recovery ever."
January 2004 - "This is a jobless recovery. Where are the jobs Mr. Bush?"
And the new mantra: It'll be reported on the major media now and thru the weekend:
June 2004 - "All these jobs, they're menial, low paying jobs."
BTTT
Then he's pretty aptly named, I would think.
Also, Mar and Apr revised up, again, by 74k. Anyone else notice that the 2.6 million jobs this year that everyone laughed about earlier, is right on target?
...NYT sub-head
yes, it's time to bring back the liberal "hamburger flipper jobs" mantra ROFLMAO
Tom Daschle is deeply deeply saddened.
Are tech jobs getting created? Does anybody know anything about that?
tech jobs are being created & the monster employment index has been hitting new highs over the past couple months.
How is that possible. Doesn't that mean that there is zero net growth?
So are the people who used to sell us the doom and gloom from "Market Wrap".....oh well, maybe they are back in the market now!
Oh yes they are. They had some yutz named Altman on Cavuto's show today, and he was spinning (lying?) like a top. The question I want to ask all the libs about the economy is, even if you could blame Bush for the sour economy (which you can't, the downturn began during the Clinton admin), what would you do different? The Dem strategists are even admitting that there is excellent job growth, but still whine that it's not enough. Exactly what would they do different? If things are clicking on all cylinders, why change anything? It's like your best hitter was in a slump but now goes on a tear where he's hitting everything in sight. Would you change his swing? Dems are really grasping for straws at this point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.