Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Socialism-Communism-Democratism ---- What's the difference?
May 31, 2004 | George M. Haddad

Posted on 05/31/2004 3:42:51 PM PDT by TripleD

SOCIALISM-COMMUNISM-DEMOCRATISM ---- What’s the difference? Part I

The advent of the socialistic/communistic tenets of Karl Marx and their direct implementation by Lenin and Stalin has been a slow but steady political process in our country. When you read the manifestos of Socialism and Communism you are aware of phraseology which is full of hate. An emotion which is effectively hidden in the sentences which proclaim the rise of the workingman. You do not read of any love or of any real humanitarian instinct. Only the overt drive for power and conquest. The common denominators for all of the Marxian Credos has been the abolition of private property, the distribution of wealth, a completely secular society or an assault on any religion and the heavy taxation of all to the point of forced dependency on government or a governing class. This is also the present platform of our Democratist party.

Marx, in his studies of economics, tended to focus mainly on capitalism. A way of life which he hated with a passion. Unfortunately, in all his works there is a lack of knowledge and sensitivity relative to the human equation.......that is, the innate human desire to create, to succeed, to possess self worth and to own.

Basically the difference between socialism/communism and democratism in today’s American political atmosphere is only in degree and not in principle. As a Socialist the aim is to control; the objective of the Communist is to own; and the main tenets of the Democratist is an embracing of both.

We have, in this instant, a distinction without a difference. To allow for difference between these entities would be to allow for a modicum of dignity for the so-called Democrat party. To understand that there is little difference is to face reality.

Our history indicates that the influx of socialist thought and doctrine has been pervasive in the last half of the 20th century with no sign today of a let-up and it was possibly spawned just prior to the beginning of the last half of the past century and during the Franklin D. Roosevelt era. The seeds of the give-away programs could have been planted at this time and principally right after WW II when Russian communism, fresh from its victories of the war was emboldened to begin its stretching on a more serious note.

At Yalta, Franklin D. exhibited his magnanimous, generous and expansive nature by giving Stalin the Balkan countries. Later he furthered this atrocity by allowing the Russians a good piece of Germany and half of Berlin. He made the appeasement philosophy of Neville Chamberlain appear as chicken feed.

Roosevelt himself was an unwitting pawn to the communists at that time and possibly in being so weak to the demands of Stalin he could have been, either consciously or unconsciously, a willing adherent to the Bolshevik ideology.

He didn’t stop there. He went local. This kind of fertile soil allowed Democratism to gain a toehold in the once proud Democrat party and created the vacuum which was later filled by the flower children of the sixties. And they filled it with an impact from which we are still reeling. The Roosevelt residue was the cadre already in place which welcomed with open arms these recalcitrant mop-head, pot-smoking misfits as they filled the open posts awaiting them. The legislative dominance of the so-called Democrats during this period exacerbated, encouraged and abetted their culture drenching hypotheses and destructive lifestyles into every aspect of our daily lives. They oozed, eased and seeped into every segment of our society which included the once considered standard bearing institutions of the day.

They presented us with culture shock. The Democrat party, or whatever you wish to call this hodge podge (and I prefer Democratist) is basically a coalition of, illiterate radicals, intellectual snobs, guilt ridden nouveau rich, the major unions, abortionists, trial lawyers, radical environmentalists, the world of entertainment freaks, generally the field of education, gay rights activists and helter skelter revolutionaries. This broad brush excludes the naive in these categories but the others know who they are. The average American who claims to be a democrat is carried along with the backwash of this conglomerate and is obviously unaware of the quagmire into which he has been thrown and to which he is a willing dupe.

After WW II we were warned on many fronts. I can still recall the Walter Winchell radio broadcasts and his lone voice via the radio waves. Some can also recollect the warnings of Senator Joe McCarthy who unfortunately lost his cause to ferret them out because of his zeal for operating beyond the limits of our constitutional safeguards. McCarthy did a great deal of flushing but the vermin hung onto the edges and with the help of the news media were able to keep from being swept down the drain.

In his book, The Fight for America, Jesse Friedman stings McCarthy pretty well but then admits “In the last few years, CIA and KGB declassified information has confirmed to some degree McCarthy's accusations of Communist infiltration in our government. I am not calling Senator Joe McCarthy a liar. He was right. The problem is, he didn't know it!”

James Forrestal was Under Secretary of the Navy under Roosevelt and Secretary of defense with Truman. The Forrestal diaries tell a story not often read or heard in our historical perspectives. There was also the fear of communistic spread here and abroad, the desire for a solid “World Organization,” and the recognition of an obvious leftist movement of the American Press.

September 2, 1944 ---- In Forrestal’s letter to Palmer Hoyt, “I find that whenever any American suspects that we act in accordance with the needs of our own security he is apt to be called a god-damned fascist or imperialist, while if Uncle Joe (Stalin) suggests that he needs the Baltic Provinces, half of Poland, all of Bessarabia and access to the Mediterranean, all hands agree that he is a fine, frank, candid and generally delightful fellow who is very easy to deal with because he is so explicit in what he wants.”

September 28, 1945 ---- Ambassador Patrick Hurley who had just returned from China told Forrestal, “a good many of the professional staff of the State Department had not merely been of no help to him but a definite hindrance.” He went on to relate that many of the American Correspondents were communistically inclined as well as many of the people in the State Department.”

July 10, 1946 ---- While visiting Japan and MacArthur at this time Forrestal wrote that MacArthur stated he was critical and contemptuous of what he called the left-wing writers in the American press. They were, he said, playing the game, whether consciously or not, of the communists against the interests of their own country.

As you can see, nothing has changed.

The fact that we have a party in our country whose sole role is to win an election even if it aids and abets an enemy while we are at war is a sad commentary. It happened before and they got away with it. Maybe this is what James Russell Lowell meant when he wrote, “Democracy gives every man a right to be his own oppressor.”

George M. Haddad Franklin, Michigan


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: communists; democrats; socialists

1 posted on 05/31/2004 3:42:51 PM PDT by TripleD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TripleD

Agreed.


2 posted on 05/31/2004 3:47:22 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TripleD

All too true, unfortunately.

Hate and class-envy have always been a vital part of Communist Party tactics, and we can see that "Hate Bush" and "bugger-the-rich" are all the Dems have now.
The Demos are not the proud political party of 50 years ago, when they were still pro-America.
They've become the enemy.


3 posted on 05/31/2004 4:02:48 PM PDT by Zman516 (No retreat, baby, no surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TripleD
Per my now "aged" tag-line...
4 posted on 05/31/2004 4:11:21 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TripleD; PhilDragoo; Ragtime Cowgirl; Cindy; SusanTK; AdmSmith; seamole; Valin; Luis Gonzalez; ...
SOCIALISM-COMMUNISM-DEMOCRATISM
There is no difference


Add, the present day Democrats...are a Party of Treason!!!

5 posted on 05/31/2004 4:27:15 PM PDT by Smartass ( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

There are a few inconsistencies to be reckoned with. Zell Miller is probably more conservative than half the Pubbies. Chaffee and spectre are probably more liberal than half your Democrats. It still pays to judge the man instead of blindly folllowing the party.


6 posted on 05/31/2004 4:30:28 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: meenie

Obviously not all in the party are communists, but the leadership of it has been hijacked by them. It is clear that the Clinton's are Marxists, especially Hillary who had them for her mentors. Kerry is one without a doubt, as was Gore. Those in charge are getting more and more blatantly red, while America sleeps.


7 posted on 05/31/2004 4:49:47 PM PDT by ladyinred (The leftist media is the enemy within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

Bump


8 posted on 05/31/2004 4:50:18 PM PDT by SAMWolf (Home is where you hang your @.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TripleD

bttt!


9 posted on 05/31/2004 4:54:53 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TripleD

read later


10 posted on 05/31/2004 10:09:04 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
I kind of think the real "Democratic Party" has simply been "perverted" (About the best term I can think of in this case) by Communists, Socialists and their assorted filthy small interests groups. Zell strikes me as a man made from different stuff leftover from different era, although for the rats, it wasn't such a great era, either (In a back of the bus sort of way.)
11 posted on 06/01/2004 2:09:18 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson