Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Double Vision: Two Telescopes for Hunting Earth-like Planets
space.com ^ | 5/26/04 | Tariq Malik

Posted on 05/26/2004 6:37:25 PM PDT by KevinDavis

After years of whittling away prospective designs for a NASA mission to search for earth-like planets around alien stars, the space agency had narrowed the choice down to two very different observatories.

The first -- a coronagraph -- would blot out at a star's light in the hopes of seeing small orbiting planets, while the other -- an interferometer -- would use a fleet of infrared telescopes working in tandem to hunt for the same extrasolar quarry.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: earth2; goliath; nasa; space; xplanets
Why do we need the Hubble if have these telescopes??
1 posted on 05/26/2004 6:37:26 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; *Space; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; ...

Space Ping! This is the Space Ping List! Let me know if you want on or off this list!


2 posted on 05/26/2004 6:37:56 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I meant to say, why do we need the hubble if we have these two telescopes.


3 posted on 05/26/2004 6:38:39 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Yeah.....what a hoot.they are looking for atmospheric pollution, global warming, nucear war and other indications of advanced civilization.


4 posted on 05/26/2004 6:42:58 PM PDT by spokeshave (It is, as it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Why do we need the Hubble if have these telescopes??

Trying to image planets around other stars is a very different type of astronomy than the general-purpose work the Hubble does.

Imagine looking for a planet around another star. The planet is very close to the star, and does not emit any light at all. All you see is reflected light. The star on the other hand, is extremely large and bright compared to the planet.

Think of it as looking for a gnat which is sitting on the edge of a searchlight aimed directly into your eyes from a distance of about 300 yards.

5 posted on 05/26/2004 6:44:39 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; RadioAstronomer; PatrickHenry; ThinkPlease; purple haze; edwin hubble; Physicist
I meant to say, why do we need the hubble if we have these two telescopes.

These new scopes are very "purpose-built" designs -- which is to say they do one thing very well -- look for earth-like planets around nearby stars. They aren't designed for other more general purpose astronomical observations, which Hubble excells at.

It's a bit like comparing an Indy Race car with a utility pickup truck -- the race car does ONE thing much better than the truck, but at most OTHER things the truck is a much better choice than the race car.

6 posted on 05/26/2004 6:45:15 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Ping!


7 posted on 05/26/2004 6:46:02 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (I am a nobody, and nobody is perfect; therefore, I am perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

read later


8 posted on 05/26/2004 6:48:18 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
"read later"

In about a billion years

9 posted on 05/26/2004 8:08:02 PM PDT by spokeshave (It is, as it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Why do we need the Hubble if have these telescopes??

That's like asking why we need F-16s when we've got B-1s. Different missions. Hubble is to some extent a jack of all trades, but it's best at deep space work, that is extra galactic.

10 posted on 05/26/2004 9:25:00 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
I meant to say, why do we need the hubble if we have these two telescopes.

Forgot to add that we don't have them yet, and will probalby not have both of them ever.

11 posted on 05/26/2004 9:27:36 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Bump !

12 posted on 05/27/2004 2:10:22 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Because the main job of the Hubble was to measure Cepheid variable stars in cosmologically distant galaxies, which is hard to do when your telescope is designed to block out the light of the star.
13 posted on 05/27/2004 6:28:53 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

14 posted on 12/27/2012 8:04:51 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson