Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry undecided on delaying nomination
AP | 5/23/04 | NEDRA PICKLER

Posted on 05/23/2004 11:29:14 AM PDT by kattracks

BOSTON (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said Saturday he has yet to decide whether to delay his nomination at the party's convention to improve his campaign's financial prospects. But he said he wouldn't put himself at a disadvantage.

"Boston will have the best convention ever put on no matter what decision," the Massachusetts senator told local television stations in his first public comment on the proposed strategy.

"We've made no decision, I've made no decision personally, but I'm not going to put myself at a disadvantage to the Republicans," Kerry said, according to WBZ-TV. "I'm not going to let silliness in the legal process deprive us of a full contest for the presidency of the United States."

Each major party candidate will be eligible for $75 million in public money once he has accepted his party's official nomination. Both Kerry and President Bush are expected to rely on public financing for the general election campaign.

But if Kerry were to be nominated at the July 26-29 Democratic convention, he would have to make that money last a month longer than Bush, who will accept the GOP's blessing at its Aug. 30-Sept. 2 convention in New York.

Once the candidates are in the public financing system, they may not raise or spend private money.

Kerry and his advisers are considering several ways to cut down the financial advantage the later convention would give Bush. Delaying the nomination is one option under consideration, although it is the most dramatic of those that have been disclosed publicly; it would be unprecedented in American politics.

Several Democratic National Convention delegates said Saturday that Kerry has to do whatever he can to avoid taking a financial beating from Bush. But many interviewed Saturday by The Associated Press also said the convention would lose some of its excitement if the nomination came later.

"That takes some of the fun out of it," said Patrick Johnson of Clinton, Iowa.

Delegate Gary Ficken of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, said, "I think it will be boring. I can't imagine attending a convention and him not formally accepting and giving a speech."

He said the purpose of the convention is "to get fired up, go back to our homes and get people out to vote for Kerry. I don't know if that's good in energizing at the grass-roots level."

Both Johnson and Ficken said, however, that a later nomination probably would make sense to help Kerry win in November. "Unfortunately, money is a top priority," Ficken said. "It's sad but true."

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who ran against Kerry in the Democratic primaries but now supports him, said Saturday he had his lawyers examine this option last November and December when he thought he might win the nomination.

"I thoroughly approve of this and think if we can find a legal way to do it we should do it," Dean said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. "It's the only way you get to make up a five-week deficit and not let the Bush campaign pound the daylights out of us."

"If this helps accomplish that goal, then more power to him," said District of Columbia delegate Andy Litsky.

David Leshtz, a delegate from Iowa City, Iowa, said the nomination part of the convention amounts to mere ceremony since Kerry secured enough delegates to win the nomination months ago. He said eliminating it to get a financial advantage would be fine by him.

"On the surface it appears to be advantageous, and if it's not illegal, why not?" he said.

Kerry advisers are examining the legal and financial considerations, as well as whether rejection of tradition at the convention would hurt him politically. The Bush campaign is planning how to counteract a convention without a nomination, including the possibility of a separate political rally with Bush elsewhere and demanding equal coverage.

"If John Kerry doesn't accept the nomination, it's not a nominating convention," Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt said. "It's a consistent pattern of John Kerry believing the rules don't apply to him."

Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said the convention would be no less important without an official nomination because it would still be a celebration for the party's eventual nominee.

"What voters are going to see is someone who is aggressive and bold and ready to fight and fight to win," she said.

Henry Yanez, a delegate from Harrison Township, Mich., said all the competition over funding probably will create more excitement among the delegates, even if there isn't a nomination at the convention.

"We've talked about how the convention could be anticlimactic, but once we get there, that mood will probably change," Yanez said. "It'll probably be more intense. There will probably be more of a fighting spirit, because of the need to take this election."

___

Associated Press writers Siobhan McDonough and Kata Kertesz contributed to this report.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: demprimary; dncconvention; kerry; waffler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
"I'm not going to let silliness in the legal process deprive us of a full contest for the presidency of the United States."

There is no controlling legal authority.

1 posted on 05/23/2004 11:29:15 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

This is great. the Rats are getting more and more over confident. They can be seen picking Kerry's cabinet and now Kerry is playing into the flip flopping, "Boston fog" stereotype.

Do I smell a 1988?


2 posted on 05/23/2004 11:31:56 AM PDT by TheOldRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I think many Americans will look on this as another attempt to circumnavigate the rules and will be turned off by it. But who knows.


3 posted on 05/23/2004 11:33:59 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (How did Ted Kennedy, who enlisted in the Army, achieve the rank of Admiral of the SS Oldsmobile???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldRepublic

I don't know about 1988, but I smell a rat named Hillary.


4 posted on 05/23/2004 11:35:56 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (George Bush kills terrorists. Bill Clinton pardons them. John Al-Qerry will apologize to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
to delay the nomination is to loose the nomination. Vacillation kills.
5 posted on 05/23/2004 11:36:20 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I smell the burning of Thunder Thighs.


6 posted on 05/23/2004 11:37:48 AM PDT by Iberian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I don't think anyone wants to run with him.

Looks like he's desperately trying to get attention because he has no real message and unremarkable as a person.


7 posted on 05/23/2004 11:39:18 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

If Kerry can do it, then so can Bush. And Bush can raise a LOT more money than Kerry, should it come to that. I guess that "rules" simply don't apply to Democrats.


8 posted on 05/23/2004 11:40:14 AM PDT by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I actually rejected the nomination, before I accepted it.
9 posted on 05/23/2004 11:47:42 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldRepublic

This will be played by Karl Rove as the mother of all flip-flops and another Clinton-Gore "no controlling legal authority" replay. I can hardly imagine a lamer five-weeks for Kerry while he tries to have it both ways, both a nominee and a non-nominee. Honestly, the Bush campaign won't even have to push the issue--it simply won't pass the smell-test with Joe Six-pack.


10 posted on 05/23/2004 11:48:03 AM PDT by DJtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DJtex

Do it, alQerry, please do it.

This is a doubledipper for those freedom lovers among us.

First, the RAT nominee takes the lead in acknowledging CFR is silliness and money rules. How's McCain going to react? Should be fun to watch.

Second, he will once again, but to a greater degree, reveal himself to all of America as the pompous ass he is. While it might look smart to the likes of Al Franken, Main Street America won't buy it.

Do it, John, do it.


11 posted on 05/23/2004 11:57:17 AM PDT by get'emall (Kofi Annan: Lawn Jockey on the Arab Street.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I can't help thinking that, if Kerry does delay accepting the nomination, it could result in one of the biggest political blunders in American history (Don't get me wrong - that wouldn't bother me in the least!). Does it leave open the possibility of someone else stealing the nomination out from under him? Is there anything in the party's rules that says the person nominated must accept or decline the nomination within a certian timeframe? Could this be the opening that Hillary is waiting for?


12 posted on 05/23/2004 12:07:41 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I actually rejected the nomination, before I accepted it.

A great line, one the Bush Campaign should use should Kerry pull this stunt. In that event, they should run an ad with the "I actually voted for the [Iraq War] funding, before I voted against it" line, followed by a voiceover using your line.

Kerry's statement is jaw-dropping: "I'm not going to let silliness in the legal process deprive us of a full contest for the presidency of the United States." Ummm, excuse me, Senator. Who is engaging in "silliness in the legal process"? Grab a mirror, if you can stand the sight.

13 posted on 05/23/2004 12:07:46 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (I've told you a billion times: stop exaggerating!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

"I'm not going to let silliness in the legal process deprive us of a full contest for the presidency of the United States."


TRANSLATION FOR THINKING IMPAIRED: I'M GONNA CHEAT!


14 posted on 05/23/2004 12:15:39 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There is no controlling legal authority.

Just drink lots and lots of ice tea, John. It can get you out of any situation involving those pesky 'legal authority' issues.
15 posted on 05/23/2004 12:22:45 PM PDT by zencat (See my profile for MAGNETIC Bush/Cheney '04 bumper stickers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"Kerry undecided" That's news? Samo, samo. Waffles R him!


16 posted on 05/23/2004 12:28:45 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

What's Kerry afriad of at the convention ?


17 posted on 05/23/2004 12:29:40 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
and he wants to be president .....HA........The man (kerry) just can't seem to make up his mind on anything
18 posted on 05/23/2004 12:30:59 PM PDT by Gone_Postal ("government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to it all away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Maybe the Dems will decide to replace him at the last minute (remember the Wellburn for Mondale funeral?)


19 posted on 05/23/2004 12:32:37 PM PDT by The Raven (<<----Click Screen name to see why I vote the way I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
"I'm not going to let silliness in the legal process deprive us of a full contest for the presidency of the United States."

Do you suppose the Federal Election Commission appreciates hearing their rules described as "silliness"?

20 posted on 05/23/2004 12:34:31 PM PDT by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson