IT is called hearsay for a reason. Someone says that someone says that someone knows something.
Someone told me that Senator Kerry was the one with the glow sticks. If he denies it...it is a cover up. Where is my article?
Notice how the media/dems tend to try to by-pass Gen. Karpinski and go above/around her? She was the General in charge, after all.
Double hearsay from an unnamed source ---- now that's journalism at it's finest!
ASSumption on your part!
I watched a replay yesterday from the hearings held earlier in the week when 3 of the top Generals were being questioned by these Senators. As Boxer, Clinton, etc read quotes taken from the NY Times and Wash. Post, Sanchez flatly denied any of these accusations...under oath.
If he's lying, he's in big trouble...but his testimony was pretty believable as he and the other Generals were adamant that so many of these stories in the press are just plain wrong.
Heck, I thought England already admitted that no one ordered them to do these things, and that many of them were just passing the time away by being crude and obnoxious...while another admitted it was in retaliation for what was done to Lynch.