Posted on 05/21/2004 8:55:20 AM PDT by SteveH
Study: Breast Baring Popular in 1600s
By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News
May 17, 2004 — Women of the 1600s, from queens to prostitutes, commonly exposed one or both breasts in public and in the popular media of the day, according to a study of fashion, portraits, prints, and thousands of woodcuts from 17th-century ballads.
The finding suggests breast exposure by women in England and in the Netherlands during the 17th century was more accepted than it is in most countries today. Researchers, for example, say Janet Jackson's Super Bowl baring would not even have raised eyebrows in the 17th century.
# See it on TV: Get a reminder to watch "Discovery Sunday."
# Explore More: in "Unsolved History"
# Read about researchers working in the field featured in our Discovery Quest series.
Angela McShane Jones, a lecturer in history at University of Warwick in Coventry, England, became interested in the subject while studying the nearly 2,000 woodcut ballads housed in the Samuel Pepys collection at Cambridge University. Additional ballad sheets located at the British Library, the National Library of Scotland, Harvard University, and other institutions fuelled her study.
Ballad sheets served as the pop music and pulp fiction of their time. With a cost between half a penny and a penny, they were affordable, and could be purchased from street hawkers, and at fairs and markets. Most featured a woodcut that illustrated 10 to 14 verses of song.
Many of these woodcuts showed women with breasts bared.
Jones told Discovery News that the ballad depictions of women coincided with popular fashion. At the time, women often wore low-cut dresses that exposed the chest and breast.
In paintings, breast exposure could have symbolic meaning, particularly when only one breast was shown. Jones explained that high court ladies often were painted in allegories as classical figures or as female saints, whose martyrdom usually involved breast removal.
Far from being a sign of tawdriness, Jones said breast exposure during the 1600s could indicate a woman's virtue.
"The exposure of the breast was a display of the classical and youthful beauty of the woman — she was showing her 'apple like' unused Venus breasts," Jones said. "This was a display of her virtue, her beauty, and her youth. Upper class women maintained the quality of their breasts by not breast feeding their children and passing them on to wet nurses."
She added, "Though women outside the upper circles may well have taken to this style, it began as a very high-class fashion which demonstrated high class and classical ideals of female beauty. The husband of a woman dressed like this would be proud to have his classical beauty on display, and for a woman it was part of her honor that she could display her virtue in this way."
Jones believes the trend probably started with Agnes Sorel, who was a mistress in the French court during the 1400s. The fashion spread, and was popularized in England by Queen Mary II and Henrietta Maria, the wife of King Charles I. In fact, the famous British architect Inigo Jones designed a dress for Henrietta Maria that fully revealed her breasts.
Bernard Capp, professor of history at the University of Warwick, agrees that breast exposure was prevalent, and not scandalous, during certain periods of British history.
Capp said during these times, "Revealing attire — worn in the right social spaces — could be fully compatible with virtue and honor."
He added that some conservatives and court outsiders, such as the 17th-century Puritan lawyer William Prynne, objected to the popular clothing, which female actresses often wore.
Capp said Prynne once criticized Henrietta Maria after she performed in a court masque, and in 1633 wrote, "... women actors (are) notorious whores."
The government responded by having his ears chopped off.
Breast-displaying fashion had a number of comebacks in the 18th and 19th century, including during the Victorian era. Jones said during many of these bust-baring periods it would have been shocking for a woman to show her shoulders or legs, which were more associated with male sexuality.
"I think that parts of the body are sexualized and desexualized for a whole range of reasons," she said. "The breasts have become a part of the body which is seen as entirely sexual, but that could change again."
I think this topic could use more exposure ;-)
I think the idea of breast-baring has a couple of outstanding points...
Perhaps we should consult the current expert on the issue. Get Alexandra Kerry on the phone
Idiots. They are not just sweater decorations, they have a biological purpose.
and passing them (the children, not the breasts) on to wet nurses."
All the humorous comments aside, I have yet to understand the big whoop with the 'wardrobe malfunction' debacle.
Can someone please explain this to me?
Boobs = bad.
People being killed, sliced and diced on NYPD blue and CSI = good clean family fun.
(selective outrage is what I think they call it)
This article is the setup BEFORE the press allows the general public to see the pictures of J F'n Kerry's slut of a daughter
We thought it part of an ongoing erosion of mores and standards, a retrogression to some more barbaric era. This research confirms it.
Repeat after me. They are just breasts, they are just breasts. Hell, I have a pair and I am sure someone in your family does too. ;->
Do you get this upset about all the violent deaths that happen each night on broadcast tv?
Will there be re-enactments?
"Mr Peabody, set the Wayback Machine to 1650...destination: Stockholm, Sweden!"
How dare you suggest that anyone in my family has breasts!
You mean "Old Saggy"?
The government responded by having his ears chopped off.
Lots of Freepers would be having trouble holding up their eyeglasses if that comment got the same punishment today.
The government responded by having his ears chopped off.
By the late 1640s, the English Revolution was on. The Puritains called the tunes for 20 years.
"Study: Breast Baring Popular in 1600s"
Update: Still Popular Today!
Hear hear, for juggs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.