Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Lyndon Banes Johnson: The Beagles Nightmare" (Talk About Vietnam? - Part 2)By R. A. Hawkins
Free Republic Network ^ | 5-19-04 | R.A. Hawkins

Posted on 05/19/2004 7:50:42 AM PDT by Bob J

Last week my article received some rather heated emails. So here is a quick response to those. Yes Eisenhower put advisors in Vietnam (1954) before Kennedy ever came along. The first American death in Vietnam, however, was one Lt. Col Dewey OSS in 1945. That was during WWII under Roosevelt as we assisted Ho Chi Minh oust the Japanese from Vietnam. Several people told me I would find a way to blame the Democrats for the whole mess and as you can see I did. Truman also kept up the same game, but assisting the French against Ho Chi Minh this time. Next Eisenhower, a Republican, came along and continued Truman’s policies of aiding the French, and the liberals all point to him. They also blame Nixon too. Kennedy was the one that escalated the war. I don’t fault Kennedy for that either. We could have won that war with ease and we would have saved a lot of our lives, and Vietnamese lives, if we had actually tried to win it. Kennedy also removed the corrupt leader Diem but he forgot something and it is something we all tend to forget. We humans tend to point fingers and therefore tend to ignore the big picture. Diem was there because he represented the people. The corruption couldn’t be removed by simply removing one person. The people were corrupt, and as a result so was their government. This series isn’t about Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, LBJ or Nixon, however. This series is about a pattern of treason that led to our leaving. Our military wasn’t defeated in Vietnam - the will of the country here was defeated. That is the exact same game we are seeing in play right here, right now. Good old LBJ had a lot to do with causing us to lose in Vietnam. Under his tutelage our boys in uniform were completely hamstrung while the war was spread wider and wider. It was the numerous flawed rules of war that caused the problem. The soldiers in the field were required to ask permission before they shot back. They weren’t even allowed to bomb the Ho Chi Minh trail. The first rule of warfare is to cut off the line of supply. The politicians over here decided to make that against the rules. All of the rules of war were ground ruled out by people who were protecting their own kids from having to go.

By the time Nixon came to power the troops were completely hamstrung. It just got worse and worse as time went on. Back home the Tet Offensive was cast as an American defeat. Never mind the fact that the other side lost half of its troops. The reason they lost half of their troops was because we knew they were coming. Col. Bill Davis who was in charge of defending Da Nang Airbase said they knew they were coming because they hadn’t found any booby traps in over 48 hours. “So we were waiting and we waxed them. We were the defenders and they were just coming in waves to be killed.” The attack took place in 68 towns and the media went wild stating it was an American defeat.

These are the things I grew up seeing. But I also got to see something else. I grew up in that quiet little neighborhood called Columbine Knolls where nothing ever happens according to the media. That is unless they see a chance to make political hay for gun control. Let me tell you a little bit about that neighborhood. The year after I left a policeman’s car was blown up into the air by a ticked off thug. I asked the officer about it after I moved back into the area and he said he knew who did it but couldn’t prove it. His Jefferson County Jeep Patrol vehicle was blown into the air causing it to land upside down in the street while his wife’s car was blown into their living room. It’s a real quiet neighborhood, most of the time.

Also in that same neighborhood lived the highest-ranking official to be killed in Vietnam. He left the military in 1963 while Kennedy was still in charge and came back as a civilian after a few years. The brass was punishing him for his honesty. He openly said we were creating more enemies with our random and excessive bombings of hamlets. When he returned as a civilian LBJ was in charge and the month he returned LBJ spread the war into areas all around Vietnam. This man of whom I speak was Major General John Paul Vann. His youngest son Pete and I were best friends. It was interesting meeting his dad because he met me once and knew my name and face from that moment forward. He would come home from the war for a few days and return not to be seen for many months. He was quite dedicated to the cause of defeating the Communists.

Mary Jane his wife would quite often have an article laid out on the kitchen table when Pete and I would walk in. “Well your dad beat the odds again.” I remember reading quite a few of those articles in the Denver Post. He would always be away from his base of operations and it would get wiped out. As a kid I used to wonder how that could be. It seemed odd that he always managed to not be there. The Denver Post used to call him ‘The Cat” because he had nine lives.

To be continued…

R.A. Hawkins is the author of "Through Eyes of Shiva", available through http://www.amazon.com/. Visit http://www.entropical-paradise.com/ -- Entropical Paradise - The Home Of R.A. Hawkins for more commentaries and editorials by R.A. Hawkins.

Comments are always welcome. Please send them to ra_hawkins@earthlink.net

© 2004 R.A. Hawkins


TOPICS: Free Republic
KEYWORDS: frncc; hawkins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2004 7:50:43 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bob J

bmp


2 posted on 05/19/2004 8:05:02 AM PDT by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J


3 posted on 05/19/2004 8:06:15 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I believe it's "Baines". Good post. I read something once about Ho Chi Minh being pro-American in 1945, and his turning communist was out of disillusionment and in revenge for the US siding with France after WW2. Thanks, France.


4 posted on 05/19/2004 8:08:33 AM PDT by Defiant (Kerry Nation: A defenseless, cheese-eating, whiny land protected by Bush Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Actually, Ho joined the CP back in the 30's --- it had nothing to do with "disillusionment".


5 posted on 05/19/2004 8:23:23 AM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Uncle Ho was a Paris-educated communist long before 1945. I'm not disputing the rest of what you said, since that seems to be the generally accepted historical account.


6 posted on 05/19/2004 8:24:18 AM PDT by Tallguy (Take the President, lay the points...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
"Ouch! (y'all)"....


7 posted on 05/19/2004 8:34:02 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (***Since The Iraq War & Transition Period Began, NORTH KOREA HAS MANUFACTURED (8) NUCLEAR WEAPONS***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, LBJ or Nixon

Remove the Kennedy Assassination and the Presidency of LBJ and we wouldn't be talking about this today. imo

I'll even go further. I believe Johnson used the buildup in Vietnam, his Great Society initiative and his phony sentiment towards Civil Rights legislation in a successful attempt to change the subject from a meaningful investigation into his complicity in the assassination.

Also, I believe John Paul Vann had the equivalency of MG but he was a retired LTC.

8 posted on 05/19/2004 8:35:44 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Vann's book is the best summary of the Viet debacle ever...


9 posted on 05/19/2004 8:41:23 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Geeez, if you're going to post lengthy history lessons try to at least get the fundamentals right...BAINES.

And, if you want to be honest about Viet Nam start with the US supported cancellation of general elections in 1956 (Ike's years). The 1954 Geneva Conference, to which we were a signatory, mandated general elections in Viet Nam (both) in 1956. We thought Ho would win so we called them off through proxy. That began the war.

Shortly thereafter we put troops into Laos, our first SE Asia misadventure (also Ike). Our Loatian exercise was a precursor and model for our early insertion of "advisors" into South Viet Nam.

Trying to give a history lesson about the VN war and starting in the 1960s is like teaching the Civil War starting with Gettysburg.

10 posted on 05/19/2004 8:41:41 AM PDT by wtc911 (keep one eye on that candle....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Remember, the communists were our 'allies' against the Nazis. So Uncle Ho's political leanings had no bearing on whether we supported him during WWII or not.

After WWII the French wanted their 'colony' (French Indochina) back (rubber and other commodities) but the Indochinese expected their independence as reward for helping the allies defeat the Japanese. Diametrically opposed world views.

We backed the French because by the 1950's we were engaged in the cold war against communist world domination (and later, the 60's, in an attempt to preserve our bases in France - that didn't work either).

I really love revisionist history. It is most difficult to get to the underlying truths of this particular time in America's history (and France's for that matter) since it is really true that the victors write the history. And since the liberal-anti-war-movement won the Vietnam war, we only get their side of events. And the entire war is disappearing from text books, and unfortunately history is disappearing from most public school curriculums entirely.

Ah, I need to get off this soap box before I get a nose bleed!!
11 posted on 05/19/2004 8:47:24 AM PDT by noscreenname ("Nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure" - Aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy; Defiant
Ho lived in the US in the early 20s (the story I remember is that he did kitchen work in Boston), then moved to Paris where he was not just influenced by the French Communists, he actually helped found the French Communist party.

He fought the Japs in WW2 by building and leading a guerilla force. After the war he agreed to keep French Indo-China (there was no Viet Nam) as part of the Greater French Republic. The french broke various commitments and he led a rebellion that culminated in the French defeat at Diem Bien Phu, after which the two Viet Nam's were created (Geneva Accords 1954) with the 17thP as the border.

The same pact that created the two VNs called for general elections to be held in 1956. We (Ike) called the elections off by proxy. That's when Ho turned his army south.

12 posted on 05/19/2004 8:50:49 AM PDT by wtc911 (keep one eye on that candle....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
The soldiers in the field were required to ask permission before they shot back

any VN vet freepers want to respond? first I've heard of this. I have heard of free fire zones, where anyone and everyone was considered hostile, and could be engaged at will.

They weren’t even allowed to bomb the Ho Chi Minh trail.

not true- it was bombed as part of rolling thunder, one of the earliest large scale bombing campaigns.

John Paul Vann - JPV was scathing toward the pentagon- asctually wound up getting cashiered, and going back as a civilian, where he was killed in a helo crash.

Sure, the politicians puttheir grubby little fingers in the pie...but the brass themselves were guilty of faulty strategy as well.

13 posted on 05/19/2004 8:59:10 AM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noscreenname
An aquaintance of mine was an armorer with a USAF Fighter Group during the Korean War. Eventually his unit re-equipped with the F-86D and shipped to Germany, via La Havre, France. At that time the French Dockyard workers were heavily influenced by the Communists and they were on strike. Evidently, their Soviet paymasters wanted to get a look at the then Top Secret F-86D so the French Longshoremen insisted on unloading the jeep carrier. Well they dumped the first fighter on the dock, and basically trashed it, whereupon US MP's basically pulled their weapons and cleared the dock. The French were not allowed to touch another aircraft.

It's stories like that that make you realize that the French are a hopeless nation.

14 posted on 05/19/2004 9:12:38 AM PDT by Tallguy (Take the President, lay the points...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
My dad (and subsequently me too) was stationed in England from 1957 to 1961. We were F86, F100 and, later, F101 squadrons. When I 'graduated' from the 9th grade my mom (very 'liberal' for that time) took me to Paris as a graduation present since the next year I would attend (board at) the American school at Bushy Park in London (Ike's WWII headquarters).

The French were rude, inept and generally disagreeable to us for the three days we were there.

Later, in 1964 my dad was assigned to a base outside Nancy (Ponte Moussouin (sp) where the Statue of Liberty was cast). I was stationed in Munich at that time. He hadn't been there three months when the entire American military in France was 'asked' to remove their bases. He subsequently helped pack up that base, an AFCS facility (Air Force Communications Service), and move it to Weisbaden Germany. I spent some leave time visiting them in France before they left. There were some merchants in the area that seemed genuinely saddened to see the Americans go, some of them had fond memories of being liberated less than 20 years before! But the people in Nancy, the largest nearby town, were downright hostile and most of the military personnel were glad to depart.

Just as a side note, my dad was wounded as Patch's Seventh Army began traversing the Vosages in WWII. He spent the initial part of his hospitalization in Nancy back then, sort of ironic in a way. He was a Purple Heart, Bronze Star with Oak Leaf Cluster, battlefield commissioned officer. Transfered to the USAF in 1949 and retired in 1975. He served behind a desk as his left leg was an inch-and-a-half shorter than his right leg compliments of that wound. He passed in 1988.

I have a great respect for the military and am humbled by the deeds of heroism our forces are performing daily in a very hostile environment. I am also ashamed that our 'free press' that those young folks are dying to protect doesn't see fit to honor them in their endeavors.
15 posted on 05/19/2004 9:42:11 AM PDT by noscreenname ("Nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure" - Aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Get it right - actually under Websters definition of banes 2 : a source of harm or ruin - that may be appropriate
16 posted on 05/19/2004 4:11:40 PM PDT by SF Republican (You know what I like about John Kerry? Nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Anyone who has NOT read the Caro LBJ has - no clue ...


17 posted on 05/19/2004 4:24:04 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
I believe it's "Baines". Good post. I read something once about Ho Chi Minh being pro-American in 1945, and his turning communist was out of disillusionment and in revenge for the US siding with France after WW2. Thanks, France.

Don't you believe it for a second. Ho Chi Minh was a dedicated life long Communist who was a member of the Comintern since the Russian Revolution. He was dedicated to expanding Communism not only throughout Indochina, but around the entire world.

18 posted on 05/19/2004 4:29:24 PM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Like one who seizes a dog by the ears is a passer-by who meddles in a quarrel not his own.
-- Proverbs 26:17

19 posted on 05/19/2004 4:30:39 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: noscreenname

We backed France because the French would have refused to join NATO had we not. In hindsight, it would have been better had the French never joined NATO.


20 posted on 05/19/2004 4:33:06 PM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson