Posted on 05/19/2004 12:05:33 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Twisted perverts ping!
Thanks, John. I'm shipping this one off to our local radio host who spent three hours yesterday telling people he couldn't see how gay marriages would hurt anybody.
Welcome, my friend.
Recently, my husband read that our bank was supporting the full gay agenda with their charitable giving and he immediately said, "We have to move our account." So, we did. This week, I received a call from the manager of that bank wanting desperately to know why we moved the account. So, I told her. She, at first, was very resistant to our view that the bank should not be supporting issues which give an unprecendented advantage to a group of people who are pushing for such a drastic change in the definition of the family. As the conversation went along, I began to realize that she was taking the "discrimination" view..If anyone would object to any homosexual issue, then it had to be discrimination, just as in racial discrimination. I, then, began to vigorously object to that view and to the idea that ANY connection exists between homosexuality and race or gender issues. Changing the whole historical foundation of a society without a vote of that entire society to give an advantage to a group simply based on the way they have sex is a travesty and is insane. This lady and I had a long conversation and in the end she seemed to grasp our view of this situation. She seemed to realize that the radical gays bringing about all these changes may not represent the majority view of the gay community and that most are not discriminated against in this society and probably just want to quietly live their lives. Those of us who worry about the unintended consequences of all this madness can do little other than to know where we are spending our money and to take care that we do not support any institution which promotes what we feel is destructive to the future.
I am outraged that disgraced Indiana basketball coach Bobby Knight would presume to write a column about family values. His vile, intemperate outbursts are contrary to everything that families are supposed to . . .
What? The author is not Bobby Knight, basketball coach? It's WND columnist Robert Knight? Never mind.
datum.
Well said, jazzlite. Especially about the no vote.
Adoption is all about baby selling to the highest bidder. Homo's tend to have a lot of money and they seem to be outbidding straight couples quite often anymore.
I think you are on to something about being approved because of being thought to be a lesbian.
A friend of ours, who is a conservative, is a university professor. She uses her own name and has been married, but is now single. She loves to go camping alone and is just an over-all self-sufficient person. She is convinced she was granted tenure not on her impressive CV and published articles, but on the mistaken impression her collegues have of her sexuality. She keeps her politics to herself in the classroom and the department meetings, while venting to the rest of us. Since she is high profile in her area of expertise, she would be a major target if they knew her politics, to the detriment of research in that specific area.
I have been vague so as not to *out* her inadvertantly.
We have noticed, over the past decade, that when lesbians enter an institution, like the public schools or the County Board, they make a concerted effort to bring in other lesbians over time, until they have a majority.
What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
I would advise reading this article carefully - note this part:
During the Supreme Court hearings on the Boy Scout case in 2000, pro-life pastor Rev. Rob Shenk was sitting in the audience next to the White House liaison for "gay" issues. Thinking the pastor was a fellow liberal, the woman whispered, "We're not going to win this case, but that's OK. Once we get 'hate crime' laws on the books, we're going to go after the Scouts and all the other bigots."
Please note the comments on the thread - some very good ones that add to the discussion.
Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.
This is nothing less than shaking a fist in the face of God. Sorry to resort to such fire-and-brimstone language, but its true.
Prepare yourself, fellow Christians. The radical left doesn't want tolerance. They want absolute unquestioned obedience to their viewpoint - and they're willing to use government force to get it.
Good work in talking through your beliefs. There's a black ministerial group that is having a protest this weekend against gay marriage. As a fellow believer I may go.
[Jonathan Yarbrough] says the concept of forever is "overrated" and that he, as a bisexual, and [his partner Cody] Rogahn, who is gay, have chosen to enjoy an open marriage. "I think it's possible to love more than one person and have more than one partner, not in the polygamist sense," he said. "In our case, it is, we have, an open marriage."_____________________________
My TWO rants:
Next up ??
_______________________________________________
- Why can't I have three wives/husbands ??
- I want to marry my pet crocodile. We're in love !
- _______________________________________________
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX(fill in the blank)
If I had to choose between those folks that are opposed to gay marriage and:
... I'll take those opposed to gay marriage. I am opposed to same-sex marriage myself.
- the Vigilante mayor of San Francisco illegally giving out marriage licenses to same-sex couples
- the mayor of New Palze, N.Y. (ditto above)
- the folks in that New Mexico county (ditto above)
- the folks in that Oregon county (ditto above)
- the city of Asbury Park, N.J. (ditto above)
- the folks filing the lawsuit in Florida suing for same-sex marriages
- (whoever I've left out doing the same)
- The Faggachusetts Court telling the legislature they MUST write a law APPROVING gay marriage.
I fault the MAYORS taking blatantly ILLEGAL actions (Vigilante actions) and LIBERAL judges not making decisions based on the law, etc. These people should be dealt with HARSHLY. Judges should be impeached and thrown out of office. Legal action should be taken against mayors NOT upholding the laws/going AGAINST the law.
I don't FAVOR an amendment on such a thing, but given the situation of out-of-control judges and mayors, what other remedy is there ? I don't see another way.
So until I see an EFFECTIVE alternative remedy, I would support the amendment.
barf alert!
MICHAEL STUPARYK/TORONTO STAR
Michael Stark, left, and Michael Lashner pop champagne
and kiss after their wedding ceremony yesterday.
Leshner called the ruling, "Day One for millions of gays
and lesbians around the world."Gay couple married after ruling
(Toronto, Canada)B.C. court OK's gay marriage -
first gay couple legally married in British ColumbiaThe Media's Gay Mafia "Queers" the News
Useful Idiot Caption-A-Rama: Special Gay Pride Edition!
Gay frat seeks approval from UT-San Antonio
(See #39 for some humor)
Black gays launch marriage equality campaign
Bump !
I saw the coming of civil rights in the '50's. A lot of good came from it. Other things were mishandled resulting in the destruction of our excellent urban schools. Family structure has been coming unraveled with the sexual revolution of the '60's, the divorce boom of the '70's. Homosexual marriage is a condition created by man which like all creations of man will collapse, but only after who knows how much misery will pass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.