Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moore on Bush (Lumpy Riefenstahl says Bush blocking film that will blow apart his reelection bid)
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | May 17, 2004 - 4:58PM

Posted on 05/17/2004 6:52:48 AM PDT by dead

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: dead
Nobody is "blocking" his film, and he knows it.

Sure he does.

He could:

Release it directly to DVD and let the libs run out and buy it.

Arrange for a network or cable premier, to get the most coverage.

Post it on streaming video on his web site.

41 posted on 05/17/2004 9:28:49 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Lumpy Riefenstahl

Cudja pleeze not do that when I have a mouth full of coffee?

42 posted on 05/17/2004 9:57:14 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Uday and Qusay are ead-day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Gee...uh...so...how do you really feel? /sarcasm

(And I certainly cannot disagree...)


43 posted on 05/17/2004 4:11:45 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (I approve this message: character and integrity matter. Bush/Cheney for '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Nah! We don't need to bring the draft back and draft him. Let's just exile him and have him sent to live among his "buddies". After all, Bush is so almighty and powerful (after all Moore says Bush is keeping the theatres from showing his film and Stern says Bush is responsible for his trash talk not being accepted. not to much that anytime someone breaks a nail it's Bush's fault)that I he should just be able to nod his head and it shall be done.


44 posted on 05/17/2004 4:17:11 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy (Are we really arrogant, or are they just jealous of us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Your post # 3 had me excited. I saw:

dead

Michael Moore

45 posted on 05/17/2004 4:19:49 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead
This photo was published in today's NYT, and it is the widest I have ever seen him. He looks like a leading candidate for diabetes or a heart attack with all this weight -


46 posted on 05/17/2004 4:25:46 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
"This photo was published in today's NYT, and it is the widest I have ever seen him. He looks like a leading candidate for diabetes or a heart attack with all this weight - "

Please send your donations of high fat content food to the Michael Moore Memorial Foundation.

47 posted on 05/17/2004 4:27:22 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
This is so contrived it's pathetic. That miserable pantload wishes his film could do such damage. Dream on, Mikey.

Moore knows the value of "the big lie".

48 posted on 05/17/2004 4:29:34 PM PDT by Cloud William
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

It looks like he may be well over 400 pounds. He is really taking a risk with his health here.


49 posted on 05/17/2004 4:30:12 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dead; hchutch
Lumpy Riefenstahl

No more calls, we have a new nickname for Michael Moore! DING DING DING!

50 posted on 05/17/2004 4:31:06 PM PDT by Poohbah (Four thousand throats may be cut in a single night by a running man -- Kahless the Unforgettable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer

I'd like to see if he could job four blocks without falling over dead.


51 posted on 05/17/2004 4:32:24 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: summer; cyborg

Quoth Cyborg: "I can hear his heart screaming."


52 posted on 05/17/2004 4:33:28 PM PDT by Nataku X (Please wait until November 3, 2004 to squabble. A house divided falls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson; Nakatu X; dead
Michael Moore reveals the content of his next film at the end of this UK article:

Fahrenheit 9/11 could light fire under Bush

Charlotte Higgins, arts correspondent

Monday May 17, 2004

The Guardian

Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 is without doubt the most flaming-hot ticket at the Cannes film festival. And with good reason: Moore hopes that it will bring down the US government.

The American film-maker has hitherto kept a tight lid on the contents of the documentary, saying only that it includes evidence of alleged links between the Bush and Bin Laden families. However, in two appearances in Cannes at the weekend before its premiere today, he revealed that the movie contains shocking footage from Iraq.

Yesterday he said: "When you see the movie you will see things you have never seen before, you will learn things you have never known before. Half the movie is about Iraq - we were able to get film crews embedded with American troops without them knowing that it was Michael Moore. They are totally f*cked."

On Saturday he said: "The film is only partly to do with the Bin Ladens and Bush. I was able to send three different freelance film crews to Iraq. Soldiers had written to me to express their disillusionment with the war. It's a case of our own troops not being in support of their commander-in-chief."

He said that at the few low-key preview screenings that have already taken place in the midwest "the reactions were overwhelming. People who were on the fence - undecided voters - suddenly weren't on the fence any more."

Moore was unequivocal about his desire to do everything in his power to help oust President George Bush in this November's elections.

"We thought, 'We cannot leave this to the Democrats this time to f*ck it up and lose.'" He wants, he said, to "inspire people to get up and vote in November."

There has already been a complicated saga over the distribution of the film. At the start of the month it became clear that Disney, the parent company of Miramax - which made Fahrenheit 9/11 - was refusing to distribute it in the US.

The film currently has distribution, according to Moore, in every other country except Taiwan.

After a baffling series of rumours and counter-rumours last week, it was revealed that Disney was allowing Bob and Harvey Weinstein, who run Miramax, to buy back their interest in the film so they could seek an alternative distributor. After a fortnight, none has yet been found.

The reasons for Disney's refusal, Moore claimed, were purely political, aimed at delaying the film's release and thus preventing Americans from seeing the explosive material it contains before the election.

"The past year we knew that Michael Eisner [CEO of Disney] was not happy about Miramax making the film but they kept on sending the money every month," Moore said on Saturday. "At the end of April they sent an executive to look at the film. They had a board meeting and five days later they decided not to distribute it, because of its political content."

Yesterday he said: "That's the reason for the blocking: so that Americans don't see it before the election."

He added: "I won't let that happen, and neither will Harvey [Weinstein]. People will see this film, by hook or by crook. I will get this out if it means breaking the law or committing an act of civil disobedience."

Eisner has previously denied that there was anything sinister about Disney's decision to block distribution. "We're such a nonpartisan company," he said. "[People] do not look for us to take sides."

The contract between Disney and Miramax states that Disney can refuse to distribute a film in certain cases, for instance if it has an NC-17 rating - the US equivalent of an 18 certificate. Under such circumstances Miramax has in the past found alternative distribution - for Dogma, a 1999 satire on the Catholic church, and Larry Clark's Kids, eventually released in 1995, which shocked many with its frank depiction of sex among teenagers.

Moore is clearly furious with the company. "I have a lot to say about Disney. It is very dangerous to give someone like me a peek behind the curtain. I will tell all as soon as the [distribution] negotiations have ended," he said on Saturday.

The film-maker is also unhappy with the way the controversy has been handled in the media.

"The press have said, 'Isn't it great for the movie?' But the last two times this happened - with Dogma and Kids - you only have to look at the box office to see that the controversy didn't help. No film-maker wants this to happen.

"I don't like the message this sends, which is, 'Don't even think of making a movie like [Fahrenheit 9/11] - it won't get distributed.' This is a chilling effect it will have. Five men and one woman [the Disney board] make a decision about what Americans can see. This is not a sign of an open and healthy society."

Moore's position has not met with universal sympathy. A piece in the Los Angeles Times last week accused his last film, Bowling for Columbine, of being "a torrent of partial truths, pointed omissions and deliberate misimpressions" and called him a "virtuoso of fictions".

But Moore has no plans to shut up shop just yet. He is planning films "on the Israelis and Palestinians, and the oil industry and lack of oil we are going to be faced with".
53 posted on 05/17/2004 4:41:22 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X

That's criminal... he needs gastric bypass.


54 posted on 05/17/2004 4:43:09 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

Looks too fat for gastric bypass to me. On a large frame like that he probably is way more than 100 pounds overweight. Probably would have to lose 50 lbs before he qualifies.


55 posted on 05/17/2004 5:05:50 PM PDT by Nataku X (Please wait until November 3, 2004 to squabble. A house divided falls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X

Seriously, he's really heavy. Why doesn't he want to lose weight? He looks so sloppy. I thought it was schtick but this is ridiculous.


56 posted on 05/17/2004 5:06:54 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy

Hmmmm .. got a point there


57 posted on 05/17/2004 5:07:36 PM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: summer

Will the media gnash their teeth over the anti-semitism and violence that Israel/Palestine Joos-are-evil film will bring about like they did with the Passion??

Hypocrites!


58 posted on 05/17/2004 5:09:12 PM PDT by Nataku X (Please wait until November 3, 2004 to squabble. A house divided falls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: summer

At the rate he's ballooning, he won't see a release date for his film: He'll have a massive heart attack.


59 posted on 05/17/2004 5:13:16 PM PDT by JellyJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

If you want a serious answer...

The international covers of MM's books display him with lots and lots of American flags/symbols... Stupid Fat White Man et al don't have American symbols on it.

MM makes waaaaaaay more off international sales than domestic sales. He sold something like 3 times more copies of his lastest book in Germany alone than in the USA.

Why do the international publishers insist on wrapping him around American flags?

Because they WANT to associate Michael Moore with the typical American--ugly, fat, sloppy, brash, crude, loud. They're saying, "Look, this is Michael Moore, the typical American, telling you what America REALLY is about!"

So, his ugliness does sell books overseas. Somehow I don't see him selling nearly as many bash-America books if he looked like Brad Pitt.

I feel almost sorry for him.


60 posted on 05/17/2004 5:13:23 PM PDT by Nataku X (Please wait until November 3, 2004 to squabble. A house divided falls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson