Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Riding out the Gas Spike
FoxNews ^ | 5/14/04 | Peter Van Doren and Jerry Taylor

Posted on 05/15/2004 2:17:54 PM PDT by wagglebee

With gasoline prices hovering around $2 a gallon, the blame game has begun and political partisans are looking to settle scores. As per usual, however, the political theatrics are drowning out the real but complicated story behind the price spike.

Rising crude oil prices explain some of the price increase. Since November, the price of West Texas crude has climbed $5.60 a barrel; translated into gasoline prices, that's about 13 cents per gallon.

But gas prices have jumped by more than twice that — by 29 cents per gallon.

The crude-price increase is not the result of production cutbacks. Despite OPEC's announced cuts, cartel production rose by about 1 million barrels a day since last year. Non-OPEC production is up another 1.5 million barrels a day.

But demand is increasing faster than production, particularly in China. Red-hot economic growth in Asia is driving the world crude market.

If we accept that about 13 cents of the price increase for a gallon of gas since November is because of surging demand for crude, that leaves 16 cents unaccounted for. Some of the price spike can be attributed to the temporary rise we see about this time every year, when refineries switch from making winter-time gas blends to more expensive but environmentally friendly summer blends.

Tight oil-refining capacity is also playing a role — not because environmentalists have shut the door on capacity expansions, but because demand for gasoline in the Far East is claiming almost all the previous unused capacity.

A tight market, however, means suppliers can charge more for gasoline. Profit margins in the refining sector are up, which means investment in new refining capacity will follow.

New environmental regulations, however, threaten to dampen the incentives to invest in new refining capacity for the American market. Of particular concern is a new federal rule that began to take effect this year requiring refineries to strip most of the sulfur out of gasoline (search). Retooling refineries to meet the new standard is a major one-time expense. Refineries in Europe and Japan have already done it to comply with similar regulatory standards. Many U.S. refineries will lay out the needed capital, but others are expected to simply close — and some already have.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enviornmentalnuts; epa; gasprices
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Once again the left has figured out a way to take more of our money, for nothing. If sulfer was so big a problem, why didn't Clinton do it? Dumb question, because then nobody could blame it on Bush.
1 posted on 05/15/2004 2:17:55 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Our gas is at $2.09 a gallon in northern Maine now. I wish the truckers would all go on strike! Stop the movement across the United States. THAT would fix them!


2 posted on 05/15/2004 2:22:05 PM PDT by SheLion (Please register to vote! We can't afford to be silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
...why didn't Clinton do it?

Clinton did do it. The rules were put in place during the late Nineties calling for a gradual reduction of sulfur content. The final phase is kicking in now.

This was one of the main reasons that the oil industry supported GWB in 2000, but he left the old rules in place.

3 posted on 05/15/2004 2:23:34 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Dumb question, because then nobody could blame it on Bush.

Going to be REAL TOUGH to blame it on a Bush who wanted to drill in Anwar and committed troops to Iraq in a war for oil!

4 posted on 05/15/2004 2:24:25 PM PDT by Bommer (John Kerry = "You mean I can get a Purple Heart for cutting myself shaving?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I received the following in email.  Worth the read.  And worth passing on.  I'm sorry about all those ">" but it is a real pain trying to delete them:

IT HAS BEEN CALCULATED THAT IF EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES DID
>NOT
> PURCHASE A DROP OF GASOLINE FOR ONE DAY AND ALL AT THE SAME
>TIME, THE
> OIL COMPANIES WOULD CHOKE ON THEIR STOCKPILES.>
>
>
> AT THE SAME TIME IT WOULD HIT THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY WITH A NET
>LOSS OF
> OVER 4.6 BILLION DOLLARS WHICH AFFECTS THE BOTTOM LINES OF THE
>OIL
> COMPANIES.>
>
>
> THEREFORE MAY 19TH HAS BEEN FORMALLY DECLARED "STICK IT UP THEIR
>behind
> " DAY AND THE PEOPLE OF THIS NATION SHOULD NOT BUY A SINGLE DROP
>OF
> GASOLINE THAT DAY.>
>
>
> THE ONLY WAY THIS CAN BE DONE IS IF YOU FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO
>AS MANY
> PEOPLE AS YOU CAN AND AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN TO GET THE WORD OUT.>>
>
>
> WAITING ON THIS ADMINISTRATION TO STEP IN AND CONTROL THE PRICES
>IS NOT
> GOING TO HAPPEN. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE REDUCTION AND CONTROL IN
>PRICES
> THAT THE ARAB NATIONS PROMISED TWO WEEKS AGO?
>
>
> REMEMBER ONE THING, NOT ONLY IS THE PRICE OF GASOLINE GOING UP
>BUT AT
> THE SAME TIME AIRLINES ARE FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES,
>TRUCKING
> COMPANIES ARE FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES WHICH EFFECTS PRICES
>ON
> EVERYTHING THAT IS SHIPPED. THINGS LIKE FOOD, CLOTHING, BUILDING
>
> MATERIALS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES ETC. WHO PAYS IN THE END? WE DO!
>
>
> WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE. IF THEY DON'T GET THE MESSAGE AFTER
>ONE DAY,
> WE WILL DO IT AGAIN AND AGAIN.
>
>
> SO DO YOUR PART AND SPREAD THE WORD. FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO
>EVERYONE YOU
> KNOW. MARK YOUR CALENDARS AND MAKE MAY 19TH A DAY THAT THE
>CITIZENS OF
> THE UNITED STATES SAY "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"


5 posted on 05/15/2004 2:24:49 PM PDT by SheLion (Please register to vote! We can't afford to be silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
This is the new scandal now that "abusegate" is over. We will have this for the next month or two. Expect Enron to be resurrected.
6 posted on 05/15/2004 2:26:43 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

I remember the summer of 2001 when Grey-out Davis was blaming Bush for the fact that California couldn't provide enough power to meet its needs, and the media ate it up. So I'm sure they will find a way to say this is Bush's fault.


7 posted on 05/15/2004 2:26:57 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

A strike would fix whom? A trucker strike would be laid squarely at the feet of 43. On the network news you would see the most gut-wrenching stories they could make out of any fallout from such a strike.


8 posted on 05/15/2004 2:30:28 PM PDT by stubb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If anyone wants to blame Bush for the rise in gasoline prices, I tell them it's because there are a lot of arabs who want Bush out so they are keeping prices high to make him look bad.

They know Kerry would not bother them.

9 posted on 05/15/2004 2:32:43 PM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Increased crude prices account for only a slight portion of the oil gas price rise. The biggest percentage cost rises are in refining and marketing. Just look at the oil company profits.


10 posted on 05/15/2004 2:35:52 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Whenever I receive one of these gas price protest emails, I "reply all" with this response:

That plan is good, but it is only one part.

The second part: DON'T TAKE THE BAIT.

What's the bait, you might ask?

It's simple; get enough American (that's U.S.--us, you and me) consumers angry and frustrated enough that we vote for a change in the White House.

Foreign governments have offered the bait. They can't vote in our elections but they sure can try to influence how we vote.

And one way that they are trying to influence our Presidential election (just like four years ago) is by buying up a lot of OPEC oil to run up the price and screw with our economy.

Japan television has reported that Communist China has bought record amounts of OPEC oil in recent weeks.

It should come as no surprise. During the last Democratic presidency U.S. nuclear secrets were practically given to the Chinese and those responsible were just winked at and never brought to justice. The same pattern as Democratic presidents have followed toward acts of terror (war) against Americans at home and abroad.

The Chinese would LOVE for us to take out our gas price frustration at the ballot box and give them a President who will give away our security.

DON'T GIVE THEM THE SATISFACTION.

DON'T TAKE THE BAIT!!

Please pass this along to everyone who received the original email. Our mutual safety and security may depend on it!
11 posted on 05/15/2004 2:36:50 PM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

Actually, it's the opposite. I saw a post on a politically neutral message board saying, paraphased, "Gas prices over 2.00. Do you think the war was not about oil?"

It's nice to have conspiracy theories wherein no matter what happens, it always support your theory.

Gas prices go down--We went to war for cheaper oil.

Gas prices stay the same--According to Peak Oil Theory, we should've been paying much higher prices by now. So we went to war for cheaper oil.

Gas prices go up--We went to war to make oil more expensive to line the pockets Bush's buddies.

It's kinda like the Bob Woodward's Saudi Arabia oil scandal. The media slammed Bush for conspiring with the Saudi prince to lower gas prices for re-election. Then, when it was proved that Woodward took it out of context, the media and John Kerry slammed Bush for NOT caring about lowering gas prices.

LOL.


12 posted on 05/15/2004 2:39:20 PM PDT by Nataku X (Kerry's Entire Campaign: Bush bad. Medals good. Bush bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Increased crude prices account for only a slight portion of the oil gas price rise. The biggest percentage cost rises are in refining and marketing. Just look at the oil company

Estimated 2004 Gasoline Price Breakdown & Margins Details

13 posted on 05/15/2004 2:41:46 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The strategy of that chain email is fatally flawed.

Not buying gas for one day will do ZERO unless you also do not consume any gasoline for one day.

"Gee, on my new diet I won't eat today but tomorrow will eat double. Yea, yea, that will work".
14 posted on 05/15/2004 2:41:53 PM PDT by AmericaUnited (It's time someone says the emperor has no clothes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paleocon patriarch
try again

Estimated 2004 Gasoline Price Breakdown & Margins Details

15 posted on 05/15/2004 2:43:56 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Seriously: Let's all fill up our tanks on the 18th so we'll be ready for the gas protest on the 19th. LOL! =)


16 posted on 05/15/2004 2:44:00 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stubb
A strike would fix whom? A trucker strike would be laid squarely at the feet of 43. On the network news you would see the most gut-wrenching stories they could make out of any fallout from such a strike.

I don't know what the answer is. I just know that we are all clutching at straws...........I don't worry much about gasoline prices, since I don't travel much. It's the home heating fuel that has "me" worried.........

Does anyone have the answer as to WHY gasoline is so HIGH???? I hear a lot of excuses, but none ring true to me.

17 posted on 05/15/2004 2:46:27 PM PDT by SheLion (Please register to vote! We can't afford to be silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X
Actually, it's the opposite. I saw a post on a politically neutral message board saying, paraphased, "Gas prices over 2.00. Do you think the war was not about oil?"

Yeah but the libs arguement was is was war for oil. If we get oil, then the price goes down. You would have to be real stupid....or Alan Colmes to buy that!

18 posted on 05/15/2004 2:53:43 PM PDT by Bommer (John Kerry = "You mean I can get a Purple Heart for cutting myself shaving?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
You would have to be real stupid....or Alan Colmes to buy that!

These are the same people who in the 1960s/1970s decided to stop working because they didn't want to "conform" to "The Establishment" and then complained that they were starving.
19 posted on 05/15/2004 3:00:59 PM PDT by Nataku X (Kerry's Entire Campaign: Bush bad. Medals good. Bush bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The solution to the gas crisis is simple......

Take the money you saved when gas prices were low in the cycle.....$.95 a gallon and apply them to the current pricing.....

No problem,


20 posted on 05/15/2004 3:06:01 PM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson