Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter - Crazy-Like-A-Fox News Viewer
townhall.com ^
| 5/13/04
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 05/12/2004 10:52:43 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
1
posted on
05/12/2004 10:52:44 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Why can't this skinny arsed vixen write in words we can all read? And why is she so hung up in the past about WMDs?
Terrorists are streaming across the borders of Iraq faster than Meskins across the Rio Grande. And we're zapping them with C-130s, Abram tanks, Apaches etc... faster they can reach their holy staging cities (terrorists, not Meskins).
Every terrorist we kill in Iraq today is one less we'll have to kill in Topeka tomorrow. That's why we're there, not because of WMDs.
"Bring em on" in Iraq because we have to kill them somewhere eventually. Syria is also nice. Just desert and a big green valley.
2
posted on
05/12/2004 11:22:38 PM PDT
by
bayourod
(Was Kerry one of the 17 Congressmen to whom Lawson sent torture pictures in March?)
To: kattracks
bttt
3
posted on
05/12/2004 11:30:35 PM PDT
by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: kattracks; onyx; potlatch; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; Happy2BMe; devolve; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; ...
I'm finishing Pete Earley,
Confessions of a Spy re one Rick Ames.
The CIA continues in its denial of the Prague Atta-Al Ani meet.
I am not comforted that CIA means other than Catastrophe Is Assured.
Ann might query PIPA, NPR and the other putzheads: where did the chemicals for the thwarted Amman chem attack come from?
After all, its captured perps confessed they were TRAINED IN IRAQ.
4
posted on
05/12/2004 11:30:56 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: kattracks
Here you go, Ann.
This one's for you.
5
posted on
05/12/2004 11:31:04 PM PDT
by
WSGilcrest
(The Three Boogitys)
To: PhilDragoo; wardaddy; Trinity_Tx; onyx; maica
I think simple bureaucratic inertia and CYA explain why the CIA is still poo-pooing the Prague Atta meeting.
"Our super spies missed it? Then OBVIOUSLY, it didn't happen!"
Same deal with the FBI and John Doe 2, and the OKC/Iraq connection.
6
posted on
05/12/2004 11:37:42 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Travis McGee
CIA & FBI: We may not always be right, but we're
never wrong.*
*And will go to any length to punish you if you prove otherwise.
7
posted on
05/12/2004 11:48:14 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: PhilDragoo
The first commandment: Thou shalt not embarrass the Bureau (or Agency).
That means, "don't go digging into our past lapses."
8
posted on
05/12/2004 11:55:35 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: PhilDragoo
Society of Professional Journalists, Society of Professional Whores.You mean they're not the same?
9
posted on
05/13/2004 12:14:32 AM PDT
by
SAMWolf
(Vengence is mine says the Lord, but I'm busy, so I sent the US Marines.)
To: kattracks
Where is Ann on all of this media blitz today??? I am angry she isn't out there yelling for heads... pour me another one kenedy, etc...
10
posted on
05/13/2004 12:19:58 AM PDT
by
Terridan
(God help us send these Islamic Extremist savages back into Hell where they belong...)
To: kattracks
So what are we supposed to do? Shut down FOX? Anyone ever notice that the libs need to force their ideology. And - if someone other than a liberal is allowed to talk on a major network - that someone requires supervision.
But allow freedom of choice and you get Rush and FOX. We need to continue the roll-back of socialism that Reagan started and free up the schools. And while we're at it...how about MORE FOX-like channels - not less. And let's not give the print media a free liberal pass....
Whoa----I forgot the courts!!! This is one big job!!!
Don't schrug yet, Atlas.
11
posted on
05/13/2004 2:53:24 AM PDT
by
The Raven
(<<----Click Screen name to see why I vote the way I do.)
To: PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP; Travis McGee; potlatch; ntnychik; onyx; dixiechick2000; jennyp; Mia T
12
posted on
05/13/2004 5:24:48 AM PDT
by
devolve
(................... [..........................Hello from Sunny South Florida.............)
To: kattracks
13
posted on
05/13/2004 5:29:29 AM PDT
by
7thson
(I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
To: 7thson
We are not worthy.
14
posted on
05/13/2004 5:34:47 AM PDT
by
Stentor
To: Stentor
I do altavista searches for pictures of Ann Coulter. You would not believe the anti-Coulter pictures that are out there.
15
posted on
05/13/2004 5:42:06 AM PDT
by
7thson
(I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
To: WSGilcrest
Sorry, WS. I snagged that sandwich up before Ann got to it. Got any more?
To: kattracks
Liberals cannot compete with right wing radio, or Fox News, so eventually they will destroy them. They are making every attempt right now in fact.
To: bayourod
why is she so hung up in the past about WMDsMaybe because she has an overpowering suspicion that a couple shoes are going to be dropped on that issue between now and the election and she (like me) wants to be in a position to say "I told you so".
You are right, of course, that moving the "game" to their neighborhood is a key component of the stategery, but the production of "Stuff Designed to Kill Millions" (maybe SDKM will work as a substitute for WMD) coordinated among the cartel of North Korea, Iraq, Pakistan, and Libya was as well, and Iraq seems to be the lynch pin that held the conspiracy together.
18
posted on
05/13/2004 6:03:29 AM PDT
by
katana
To: kattracks
bump
19
posted on
05/13/2004 6:05:55 AM PDT
by
PGalt
To: bayourod; Travis McGee
Why can't ...[Ann Coulter] write in words we can all read? And why is she so hung up in the past about WMDs?
(Psst: Which words were too big for you?)
If you read Peggy Noonan's column in today's Opinion Journal, you will see that the concept of WMD hurting Americans and America in America is a very real concern. There are people who want to DESTROY us so that they can laugh and dance at our collapse. These people are living for the day that they can get their hands on really terrible killing tools.
It is possible that Hussein only thought he had WMD. If so, who lied to him? In any event, those who want to use them WERE in contact with Saddam.
The anthrax that killed some Americans probably came from Saddam's stores. Let us pray that what was used was his entire living stock.
20
posted on
05/13/2004 6:32:52 AM PDT
by
maica
(Member of Republican Attack Machine, RAM, previously known as the VRWC)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson