Skip to comments.
Parents blame Bush for son's execution
financial times ^
| Published: May 12 2004 5:00
| Joshua Chaffin
Posted on 05/11/2004 7:27:30 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
Parents blame Bush for son's execution By Joshua Chaffin in Washington Published: May 12 2004 5:00 | Last Updated: May 12 2004 5:00
Parents of a UScontractor executed by Islamic militants in Iraq are blaming the Bush administration for his death, saying that US authorities had contributed to the tragedy by unlawfully detaining their son for nearly two weeks before his disappearance.
Michael Berg claimed yesterday that his son, Nick, was held by US authorities without access to a telephone or lawyer because of suspicions that he was an insurgent or terrorist. By the time he was finally released in early April, according to Mr Berg, the security situation had so deteriorated that it was difficult for him to make his way home.
"That's really what cost my son his life, the fact that the United States government saw fit to keep him in custody for 13 days without any of his due process or civil rights," Mr Berg said.
Nick Berg, a small business owner from Pennsylvania, went to Iraq in December to help rebuild the country's infrastructure. Instead, he became the latest western contractor to have died a grisly death in that pursuit.
His headless body was found on a roadside by US soldiers yesterday. A video from an al-Qaeda-affiliated website depicted his decapitation by a gang of men who claimed to be taking revenge for the abuses committed by US soldiers at the Abu Ghraib prison.
The execution drew outraged comments from US leaders. White House spokesman Scott McClellan said those responsible had "no regard for the lives of innocent men, women and children".
Rick Santorum, a Republican senator from Mr Berg's home state, called it "an outrage to the civilised world", and said: "If anyone wants to know what we're fighting and why we're fighting this war on terrorism, this is a very good example of it."
The family's accusation comes as the Bush administration struggles to fend off allegations that it has denied the civil rights of thousands of mostly Arab detainees it is holding in military prisons around the world on suspicion of terrorism.
Mr Berg was apprehended by Iraqi officials near the northern city of Mosul on March 24, according to his father, who claims that he was then interrogated by FBI agents.
Mr Berg was released on April 6, a day after his parents filed a lawsuit in federal court naming defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld as a defendant, and claiming that their son was being unlawfully held. They last heard from him on April 9.
The FBI said it was premature to comment on the case. An official familiar with the case acknowledged that FBI agents had interviewed Mr Berg, but said he was in Iraqi - not American - custody. The official was unable to clarify the legal difference between the two, given the US occupation.
But Mr Berg's father disputed this, saying it was "the FBI", when asked in a radio interview who had detained his son.
"We named Rumsfeld as the responsible person, and I still hold him responsible," Mr Berg said. "It's the whole Patriot Act. It's the whole feeling of this country that rights don't matter any more because there are terrorists about," he added. Additional reporting by Edward Alden
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; answer; beheading; berg; decapitation; iraq; nickberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-194 next last
1
posted on
05/11/2004 7:27:38 PM PDT
by
CGASMIA68
To: t1b8zs
He was in Iraq with NO JOB.
I'm already sick of these people.
2
posted on
05/11/2004 7:28:50 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: t1b8zs
I'm starting to think there's more to Nick Berg's story than meets the eye. Why was he arrested in the first place?
3
posted on
05/11/2004 7:30:04 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: t1b8zs
In that case what WAS he doing there and was he really one of them? Or an adventurer to sell out to whomever would pay?
I hope this can be truthfully sorted out. With the current understanding of "truth" who will ever know.
4
posted on
05/11/2004 7:31:58 PM PDT
by
Spirited
To: t1b8zs
We named Rumsfeld as the responsible person, and I still hold him responsible," Mr Berg said. Well, that didn't take long.
To: t1b8zs
It sounds as if their son's death is fitting in with their Bush-hatred. Stop using the memory of your son for political fodder.
To: Right_in_Virginia
Enter, Johnny Cocran?
7
posted on
05/11/2004 7:33:55 PM PDT
by
CGASMIA68
To: t1b8zs
Strange. They just lost a son and now they are playing politics with his death.
8
posted on
05/11/2004 7:35:19 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: Howlin
I like how Phil Hendrie explained this just a few minutes ago, fr his parents to blame the Iraqis, it would mean that they would have to admit there is evil in this world and that if there is evil then they would have to engage it and do something about it. By blaming Bush they get to go back to doing what they were doing before this happened which was nothing.
9
posted on
05/11/2004 7:35:35 PM PDT
by
tertiary01
(DEMS- the other surrender monkeys.)
To: Texas Eagle
That's the question I keep asking:
WHY WAS HE ARRESTED IN THE FIRST PLACE???
10
posted on
05/11/2004 7:35:41 PM PDT
by
baltodog
(There are three kinds of people: Those who can count, and those who can't.)
To: Right_in_Virginia
"We named Rumsfeld as the responsible person, and I still hold him responsible," Mr Berg said. "
So was Rummy the masked killer or one of the two nervous guys on each end?
They will dishonor their son's memory if they are not careful!
To: Right_in_Virginia
It sounds like a suit coming.
The people responsible for their son's death were the people who cut off his head - period. Go sue them.
I'm sick and tired of these whinning liberals. Right - WHAT the heck WAS he doing over there in the FIRST place??
12
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:09 PM PDT
by
ZULU
To: t1b8zs
I have one thing to say about the beheading. Civilian opportunists should not be in a war zone, it could be hazardous to ones health. He was there getting paid by the US Government about $20,000.00 per month. I don't think it was worth it. And his liberal commie father wants to blame Bush.
13
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:12 PM PDT
by
chainsaw
(http://www.hanoi-john.org.)
To: Paul Atreides
There is already a precedent ... Rachel Corrie's parents.
14
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:37 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Marginalizing the Fascist Left is the only option)
To: t1b8zs
It's the whole Patriot Act. That's it, it's that dadgummed Patriot Act. Why, before that POS legislation, you could wander about a warzone with impunity. What's this world coming to? (/sarcasm)
15
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:40 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
( During the cola wars, France was occupied by Pepsi for six months.)
To: t1b8zs
"That's really what cost my son his life, the fact that the United States government saw fit to keep him in custody for 13 days without any of his due process or civil rights," Mr Berg said. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Nick Berg wasn't beheaded while in the custody of the US government was he?
/rhetorically sarcastic question./
16
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:44 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: Texas Eagle
I've also heard that his father has signed on the ANSWER pledge.
17
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:45 PM PDT
by
katz
(Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry.............I'm tired of being sorry.)
To: All
I bet if someone does investigating of these parents, we'll find out that they're hardcore anti-war/anti-Bush Democraps.
To: t1b8zs
Am I missing something? Why was he being held by the US military? Was he accussed of something?
Regardless. I feel bad for his family. Horrific to find out that his death was on some cheap Islamonut website.
19
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:57 PM PDT
by
Burkeman1
("I said the government can't help you. I didn't say it couldn't hurt you." Chief Wiggam)
To: chainsaw
He was there getting paid by the US Government about $20,000.00 per month. But I thought only Haliburton was profiting off this war?
20
posted on
05/11/2004 7:38:30 PM PDT
by
kjam22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-194 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson