Skip to comments.
Astronomers may have image of extrasolar planet
SPACE.com ^
| May 10th 2004
| Robert Roy Britt
Posted on 05/10/2004 9:49:46 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
This is one of the three new processed observations showing a point of light (in the upper right) that may be a planet or brown dwarf. An additional observation a few months from now is needed to show whether the object moves with the white dwarf and is therefore a companion, or if it is a background object moving at a different pace.
1
posted on
05/10/2004 9:49:47 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: KevinDavis; RadioAstronomer
.
2
posted on
05/10/2004 10:02:09 AM PDT
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: presidio9
Through careful and advanced image analysis, I have come to a conclusion:
GIANT SPACE ANTS!
3
posted on
05/10/2004 10:04:41 AM PDT
by
kenth
To: kenth
"And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves."
4
posted on
05/10/2004 10:09:43 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: presidio9
Clear as crystal! WTG guys! Now, if we can just get Hillary and the other of her clan to head back home, since we've positively identified their homestead, this country will be well on its way towards prosperity.
To: presidio9
More than 120 are known There are billions, but none even come close to being earthlike.
6
posted on
05/10/2004 10:16:37 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: presidio9
Here's a better picture of the White Dwarf:
To: presidio9
I hope they name the planet "Plexus" -
"Class, this is the extrasolar Plexus..."
8
posted on
05/10/2004 10:24:57 AM PDT
by
talleyman
(Moose lips sink ships.)
To: Mr. Mojo
You might want to see this. It's pretty kewl. ;-)
9
posted on
05/10/2004 10:29:27 AM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(I am a nobody, and nobody is perfect; therefore, I am perfect.)
later
10
posted on
05/10/2004 10:45:33 AM PDT
by
Rocket1968
(Democrats will crash and burn in 2004.)
To: kenth
"Let me be the first to welcome our new insect overlords."
NFP
11
posted on
05/10/2004 11:02:20 AM PDT
by
Notforprophet
("You can have a nanny state if you prefer. But not for long." - Mark Steyn)
To: kenth
GIANT SPACE ANTS!
Just don't let them get in to the sugar.
12
posted on
05/10/2004 12:54:06 PM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter & a sense that the world was mad.")
To: kenth
ROFL - I was lookin at it thinking they ran into a bug at high speed. Kinda like the opening of MIB lol
13
posted on
05/10/2004 12:57:07 PM PDT
by
Havoc
("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
To: kenth
I might add that it doesn't look too dissimilar from what One sees from the inside of a motorcycle helmet in summer and at speed lol
14
posted on
05/10/2004 1:10:13 PM PDT
by
Havoc
("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
To: robertpaulsen
I was thinkin' Mickey Rooney.
To: kenth
My more complete analysis, based on your advanced image enhancement, reveals that you missed a limb of the space creature which appears, dimly but clearly, in the 10 o'clock position. Carefully counting the revised number of limbs, I arrive at a total of eight which indicates, not an ant, but a GIANT SPACE SPIDER!
In fact, the white hazy area in the night skies which generations of astronomers has taken to be the, "milky way" is in fact THE GIANT SPACE SPIDERS WEB, which is slowly expanding to ensnare our home world. My calculations indicate that our total encirclement will be completed and our doom assured by 12:01 AM, EST on April 1st, 2005.
Resistance is futile!
16
posted on
05/10/2004 1:43:38 PM PDT
by
finnigan2
(My more advanced)
To: RadioAstronomer; Physicist; ThinkPlease; edwin hubble; PatrickHenry
first the extra-solar planet deniers (ESPD) screamed: "there's no evidence!!!", then astronomers found spectroscopic evidence of wobbling in nearby stars consistent with planet-sized masses orbiting them, so the ESPD's then screamed: "Yeah, well nobody has ever seen one....", and now it appears, pending further verification, that astronomers have directly imaged an extra-solar planet.
So what will the ESPD's next line of defense/goalpost moving be? "Well, no one has ever tasted one....."?
To: longshadow
They'll say, "Not a planet. This is a brown dwarf star." They'll call Jupiter a dwarf star if they have to, just as surely as the next guy--or quite likely the same guy--will call homo erectus an ape to rescue his worldview.
To: Physicist
They'll say, "Not a planet. This is a brown dwarf star." They'll call Jupiter a dwarf star if they have to, just as surely as the next guy--or quite likely the same guy--will call homo erectus an ape to rescue his worldview. As usual, your analysis is on the money. But at some point it becomes pernicious to call Jupiter-sized objects "brown dwarfs," as they are something like 80 times less massive than the minimum mass it takes to sustain nuclear fusion in the core, which is the signature characteristic that makes a "star" a "star." Not that that will stop them from trying.....
To: longshadow; Physicist
20
posted on
05/10/2004 2:26:57 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson