Skip to comments.
Blix subordinates on Saddam's payroll
Fox News ^
| May 9, 2004
| Self
Posted on 05/09/2004 9:06:54 AM PDT by SaudiDuck
Two of Blix's subordinates found to be on Saddam's payroll. Iraqi nuclear scientists sent to Libya prior to the war. Objective to create an Arab nuclear weapon.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blix; bush2004; corruption; iraq; libya; proliferation; saddam; un; uncorruption; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-194 next last
To: GottaLuvAkitas1
"
Do you have any idea when the SwiftBoat story will be on Fox today?"
It ran about an hour ago. (EST)
I can't give you the particulars, other than it was about 10 minutes long, and it was stated that more would be aired next week.
More astute Freepers ... HELP!
41
posted on
05/09/2004 9:45:31 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(A President is best judged by the enemies he makes when he has really hit his stride…Max Lerner)
To: SaudiDuck
Won't be surprised if Scott Ritter's name comes up as being paid by Saddam.
42
posted on
05/09/2004 9:45:35 AM PDT
by
3catsanadog
(When anything goes, everything does.)
To: 3catsanadog
bttt
43
posted on
05/09/2004 9:47:21 AM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: SaudiDuck
I caught the tail end of this - the guy's name is John Loftis. Where have I heard his name before?
44
posted on
05/09/2004 9:47:30 AM PDT
by
3catsanadog
(When anything goes, everything does.)
To: Howlin
45
posted on
05/09/2004 9:48:24 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: woodyinscc
I hope the President takes this arrow out of the quiver and shoots it fast. If ever there was a time to bump a big story off the drooling media, it's NOW.
But then, the GOP high PR mucky-mucks have never been known for good timing and taking advantage of breaking news. They seem to think the pathetic "conservative" Tucker Carlson-types of the TV world will do their work for them.
Leni
46
posted on
05/09/2004 9:49:45 AM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(Two Week Coundown Till "Full Sails Ahead" for FReeps Ahoy FReeper Cruisers! HOO-YAH!)
To: SaudiDuck
I can't find ANYTHING on this. Please post the full link to the article.
MEGA-
Stay Strong
Fuzzy
47
posted on
05/09/2004 9:49:52 AM PDT
by
fuzzy122
To: SaudiDuck
Bookmarked.
Blix the fool.
To: SaudiDuck
bump!
49
posted on
05/09/2004 9:50:28 AM PDT
by
The Mayor
(A person who thinks too much of himself thinks too little of God.)
To: SaudiDuck
Well now, will wonders never cease. What else will come slithering out from under this rock of corruption?
50
posted on
05/09/2004 9:51:02 AM PDT
by
ride the whirlwind
(And we will defend the peace that makes all progress possible. - George W. Bush)
To: SaudiDuck
Will the media be able to cover this up? It's a huge and very interesting story. Well, we'll see. I'll bet they TRY to cover it up. They've invested far too much of their credibility in "no WMDs" to let mere facts stand in their way.
This kind of thing certainly kills the pretense that the media neglect certain stories because they don't increase ratings or circulation. That's a load of horse manure. Think of all the newspapers they could have sold with the Chinese treason story.
Or, for that matter, with human interest stories about the good work our troops are doing in Iraq. Even the American deaths would have far more meaning if they were seen as the deaths of heroes rather than as proofs that Bush is a bad president. But, no. The media are too far gone to change without some sort of huge blowup.
51
posted on
05/09/2004 9:52:57 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: tentmaker
John Loftus said that that the UK MI-5 dug out the info, so it's reliable.
52
posted on
05/09/2004 9:53:11 AM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: G.Mason
Fox report sounded like there is lots more to come. The lady journalist that had been in Viet Nam at the time was great. She sounded like she won't drop this story.
To: 3catsanadog
To: 3catsanadog
It's come up in a roundabout way: Saddam paid the guy who financed Ritter's "documentary." It wouldn't surprise me if more turned up. I don't think we've scratched the surface yet.
55
posted on
05/09/2004 9:55:47 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: MizSterious; MEG33; Grampa Dave; okie01; Allan; TrebleRebel; piasa; Fedora; Destro; Mitchell; ...
So is journalist Christopher Hitchens going to spill the beans or play coy still...article from Feb. 2003
Inspecting "Inspections"
"...Faced with all these material breaches, including conclusive evidence that the Iraqi authorities know when they are dropping by and where, the "inspectors" have to admit that they have become the objects of inspection rather than the conductors of it. In fact, it's glaringly apparent that their ranks have been infiltrated, or suborned, or both. I know of at least one incontrovertible case where a senior inspector was offered a huge bribe by Tariq Aziz himself: The man in question refused the money, but obviously not everybody did. Those who are calling for "more time" in this process should be aware that they are calling for more time for Saddam's people to complete their humiliation and subversion of the inspectors. ..."
56
posted on
05/09/2004 9:56:13 AM PDT
by
Shermy
To: SaudiDuck
Don't you realize that 'dressing terrorists in woman's panties', is much more CATASTROPHIC than Middle Eastern terrorists getting Nukes? Fox news may just be the ONLY news outlet you hear this from and the print media will bury it in a one paragraph story on page F-47.
57
posted on
05/09/2004 9:56:57 AM PDT
by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: Howlin
Well, well, well. I'm shocked. NOT.
58
posted on
05/09/2004 9:58:34 AM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(You need tons click "co-ordinating")
To: thoughtomator
Could the planets be lining up to take out alQerry AND the corrupt mud hut United Nations? Let's review our notes:
JF'nK backs down on "No WMDs" claim
Oil-for-Bribes scandfal only reaching higher at UNHQ
Blix and the boys on retainer from Saddam
We could be heading into a perfect storm that takes out a lot of these criminals (including the NY slimes, the bucketneck senior senator from Massachusetts and Cankles Clinton herself).
Dare to dream, FR. Good times are comin'.
59
posted on
05/09/2004 9:59:08 AM PDT
by
get'emall
(Time to pick sides.)
To: goodnesswins
"
YEA...we told some friends of ours last night about the Swift Boaters who found Kerry UNFIT for Presidency....and they had heard NOTHING about it....."
It's a comin!
Here is a link to the SwiftBoat web site.
60
posted on
05/09/2004 9:59:16 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(A President is best judged by the enemies he makes when he has really hit his stride…Max Lerner)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-194 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson