Replies

"I didn't speak to any macro conclusion like you (wrongly) came up with. "If we don't rebuild, we won't be attacked." has nothing to do with it."

So then you're suggesting that this site differs fundamentally from the rest of the country. Not just a matter of it being more vulnerable because it's a construction site, because, or being a more obvious target. Construction sites will always be harder to secure and tall buildings will always be more obvious targets. So, for the above to not be a macro conclusion, then this site has to, somehow, follow a completely different set of rules than any other place in the country.

"In fact, I was explicit about that last point in my last post. Talk about pointing things out - you either can't or won't follow the thought process properly."

It might have something to do with my not being able to jump over the gaping hole.

"As for your words about forcing people to work at a construction site, they are shallow and immature. Nobody signs on to a domestic constuction job with the understanding that they might get murdered."

Well then you'll be proven wrong if they get a crew to work on the site.

You clearly have difficulty understaning the english language.

I did not suggest the site differs fundamentally from the rest of the country. I explicitly said so. There was no suggestion - you can't distinguish between suggestions and explicit statements.

This site is unique because of a combination of the history of the site, the location, and how this compounds the unique demands of securing not simply a tall building, but what will be the tallest building in the world.

Whether you are unwilling or unable to see this speaks volumes for you.

Your macro analysis is patently wrong, simpleminded, shallow, and ignorant of the nuances of the location. This is explicitly a different situation and a different set of rules are appropriate.

There is no suggestion here, it is explicit. There is no gaping hole, I am sorry to report. The WTC site is, indeed, different that sites all over the country. Suggesting anything else is denial.

As for getting a crew, again, you show an unwillingness or an inability to read and comprehend. They will get a crew - I don't doubt that. Very quickly they will become victims of domestic terrorist attacks. Many will die. Many will leave. Then they will have to pay people more to work there. At that point, people will knowingly and willingly be free to sign on or decline the project with the understanding that they in fact may get murdered.

"Nobody forced them." Well, nice words from your safe perch in Louisiana, son.