Replies

You clearly have difficulty understaning the english language.

I did not suggest the site differs fundamentally from the rest of the country. I explicitly said so. There was no suggestion - you can't distinguish between suggestions and explicit statements.

This site is unique because of a combination of the history of the site, the location, and how this compounds the unique demands of securing not simply a tall building, but what will be the tallest building in the world.

Whether you are unwilling or unable to see this speaks volumes for you.

Your macro analysis is patently wrong, simpleminded, shallow, and ignorant of the nuances of the location. This is explicitly a different situation and a different set of rules are appropriate.

There is no suggestion here, it is explicit. There is no gaping hole, I am sorry to report. The WTC site is, indeed, different that sites all over the country. Suggesting anything else is denial.

As for getting a crew, again, you show an unwillingness or an inability to read and comprehend. They will get a crew - I don't doubt that. Very quickly they will become victims of domestic terrorist attacks. Many will die. Many will leave. Then they will have to pay people more to work there. At that point, people will knowingly and willingly be free to sign on or decline the project with the understanding that they in fact may get murdered.

"Nobody forced them." Well, nice words from your safe perch in Louisiana, son.

"You clearly have difficulty understaning the english language."

No, you clearly have difficulty dealing with any attempt to apply reason to your scattered logic. Your reasoning on the WTC site doesn't apply to the rest of the country, but the site isn't fundamentally different anyhow, but different rules apply for some reason. You're trying to claim that two contradictory ideas are true at the same time so that you can switch between to avoid having to make an argument to defend one of them.

Case in point-

"Nobody signs on to a domestic constuction job with the understanding that they might get murdered."

"They will get a crew - I don't doubt that."

"At that point, people will knowingly and willingly be free to sign on or decline the project with the understanding that they in fact may get murdered."

The English language works only as well as the person using it. It can't make up for your doublethink.

You can repeat yourself as many times as you like, and attempt to obfuscate the matter with as many disclaimers and insults as you like, but it will not change the fact that there is a gaping hole in your argument that you refuse to address.

""Nobody forced them." Well, nice words from your safe perch in Louisiana, son."

Having fun talking to yourself there?