Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alarming rise in 'uppers' use by preschoolers
World Net Daily ^ | 5/3/04 | Kelly Patricia O Meara

Posted on 05/04/2004 5:50:47 PM PDT by wagglebee

For many people it is difficult to comprehend how children younger than 5 could be prescribed mind-altering drugs and be taking them on a regular basis, but according to a recent survey by Express Scripts Inc., a private pharmacy benefit manager that researches drug trends, not only are children from birth to age 5 being given antidepressants, it is this age group that has shown the largest proportional increase in the use of antidepressants.

The Express Scripts survey, titled Trends in the Use of Antidepressants in a National Sample of Commercially Insured Pediatric Patients, 1998 to 2002, presented prescription-claims data that showed "the overall prevalence of antidepressant use among children increased from 160 per 10,000, or 1.6 percent, in 1998 to 240 per 10,000, 2.4 percent, in 2003, for an adjusted annual increase of 9.2 percent.

The growth in the overall prevalence of antidepressants use was greater among girls, a 68 percent increase, than boys, a 34 percent increase. In 2002 antidepressant use was highest among girls aged 15 to 18 years, at 640 per 10,000, or 6.4 percent.

The trend of increasing overall use of antidepressants among children and adolescents appears to have been driven primarily by greater use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors."

The survey concludes that "the growth in the prevalence of use of antidepressant medications among youths appears to be continuing, and the rate of increase between 1998 and 2002 is similar to the rate of increase seen in the period of the second-generation antidepressants, the late 1980s to mid-1990s."

This survey comes on the heels of the Food and Drug Administration recommending that pharmaceutical companies "change the labels of 10 drugs to include stronger cautions and warnings" due to increasing criticism about the potential for violence and suicide in adolescent and pediatric patients while taking the drugs.

The antidepressants that fall under the FDA's recommendation, which also are included in the Express Scripts survey, include Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Luvox, Celexa, Lexapro, Wellbutrin, Effexor, Serzone and Remeron.

Naturally, a first impulse is to point the finger at the pharmaceutical companies, but in this instance, because a diagnosis must be made before a prescription is filled, critics are asking how one diagnoses an infant, a 2-year-old toddler, or even a 5-year-old preschooler with depression or any of the other 300 mental disorders? Given that this is at best a purely subjective practice, one might at the very least imagine that diagnosing a child who does not yet speak would be difficult if not impossible.

But according to David Fassler, a clinical associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Vermont: "Depression can certainly begin at very early ages. We can see signs and symptoms of depression in preschoolers, and there are even infants who can experience depression. They may be withdrawn, don't interact, may be reluctant to eat, and they may not gain weight or even lose weight. There are a lot of other medical problems that need to be ruled out in such circumstances, and we sometimes find that there are issues with depression elsewhere in the family, so if there is a parent with depression, it may get expressed in certain ways through the child."

As Fassler sees it: "There are certainly 2- and 3-year-olds who get treated with medication, and it's not surprising to me that this group has shown the largest proportional increase. But the numbers are still relatively small. And [diagnosing] it should only be done by someone who has the appropriate training and expertise and closely monitors the child. If you're talking about preschool kids, then the symptoms would include kids who are withdrawn, sad, irritable, may be tearful, may have difficulty sleeping, they lose their appetite, they look sad all the time and they may be reluctant to play with other kids. Clearly these are not easy diagnoses and you can't do them in a five-minute office visit. It really requires comprehensive evaluation that may take several hours that would involve understanding the child's developmental history, the family history, and really reviewing the medical history closely."

Maybe the infant or toddler is depressed, but couldn't any or all of those "symptoms" be due to many things other than mental illness? "Absolutely," says Fassler, "and that's why they need a comprehensive evaluation. The symptoms can be due to other psychiatric problems like anxiety, ADHD [attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder], conduct disorder or a reaction to certain medications and certain stresses in the child's life, or it could be a phase or even a mood the child is going through."

Though it does seem hard to imagine the kind of expertise needed to diagnose the difference between the alleged mental illness known as "conduct disorder" and just being a toddler, Peter Breggin, a psychiatrist and author of the Antidepressant Fact Book, tells Insight that regardless of the diagnosis, use of mind-altering drugs on the very young is outrageous.

"To inflict these drugs on the growing brains of infants and children," says Breggin, "is wrong and abusive. We're in an era of technological child abuse in which physicians routinely, whether they know it or not, are actually abusing infants and children with toxic substances, rather than addressing their real needs. And if an infant is so grossly apathetic that it is apparent to a pediatrician or a family doctor, then something very disturbing is going on with that child's physiology or that child's life."

According to this forensic psychiatrist: "These drugs have not even proven to be useful in adults, where the studies are marginal at best, and we now have the FDA acknowledging that in both children and adults the drugs produce a wide variety of behavioral and mental abnormalities. Antidepressants drastically change the functioning of widespread neurotransmitters in the brain, and there is no way to interfere at a stage of rapid growth without disturbing the function of the brain."

Breggin concludes, "We're talking about an extreme here with these off-label prescriptions [for drugs not approved for children]. This is off-commonsense usage and out-of-reason usage."

He adds, "Parents need to reclaim their children from the medical and psychiatric experts when it comes to psychological and behavioral problems, because the answers do not lie in drugs. Don't rely on a physician for a prescription to raise a child."

Congress looking into it

The question of whether intervention is needed in the ever-increasing use of mind-altering antidepressants on America's children finally has landed squarely in the lap of congressional lawmakers, and both Senate and House committees are looking into the matter.

Rep. Jim Greenwood, R-Pa., who chairs the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, tells Insight that the issue caught his attention when Great Britain acted to ban antidepressants in children younger than 18.

"What we know," says Greenwood, "is that there have been studies in Europe that have indicated there may be a correlation between the use of antidepressants among children and suicidal ideation, attempted suicide and, tragically, suicide. And it seems to be the case that not all of the studies that drug manufacturers have done have found their way to the FDA – and, of course, that's not necessarily a violation of law, but we think it is important. We want to make sure that these drugs are safe. Once we answer the question as to whether there is a problem, we can decide what action needs to be taken."

Greenwood explains: "We've requested information from seven of the pharmaceutical companies and from the FDA. Based on what we get back we'll then decide whether to hold hearings. Whether we have to look at diagnosing, my impulsive answer is that certainly the diagnosis and the drugs should be looked at in total. But I'll have to sit down with my staff and talk about this. You're alerting me to [connections between school shooters and prescription drugs] that I'm not aware of, but I am fascinated. I think that the answer is yes, we have to look at both questions – both the diagnosing and the drugs – but I'm sure you have a problem with what came first, the chicken or the egg. Did the shootings happen because of mental disorders or because of the drugs?"

Considering that the FDA has recommended stronger warning labels for these antidepressants, say critics, one may assume that the federal agency made this decision based on official data. Congress would do well to ask for that data, critics urge.

Getting the American Psychiatric Association to provide Congress with the science to prove even one of its more than 300 mental disorders would be unprecedented. But critics argue that until those questions are answered, American children will continue to be "medicated" with mind-altering drugs.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adhd; antidepressants; druggingourchildren; drugwar; earlychildhood; mentalhealth; pushers; ritilin; schools
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This is just ridiculous, 20 years ago this crap wasn't even considered and most children turned out okay.
1 posted on 05/04/2004 5:50:48 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Antidepressants aren't "uppers"....misleading headline.

2 posted on 05/04/2004 5:54:45 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Sheesh. How long will it be before we start reading about school shootings in nursery school?
3 posted on 05/04/2004 5:54:49 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I would venture to say that most children of 20 years ago or more turned out better than the majority of children today. All children, at one time or another, are withdrawn, sad, irritable, tearful, et cetera.

I would say that the chance for an incorrect diagnosis is much, much higher with such a young child, who cannot yet well express his or her feelings in words. It's more than just ridiculous, it's careless and dangerous. And it leads to adults who cannot work themselves out of even the slightest problem, because they get taught that pills will fix their issues.
4 posted on 05/04/2004 5:59:18 PM PDT by AQGeiger (Militant Islam is the gangrene among humankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger
Of course, more children, years ago, had a mommy and a daddy and didn't need mind-altering drugs.
5 posted on 05/04/2004 6:10:13 PM PDT by no more apples (God Bless our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"when toddlers go bad" or "when preschoolers get down" -- where's monty python for this bookend to the bad grannies?
6 posted on 05/04/2004 6:14:15 PM PDT by cyn (http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger
All children, at one time or another, are withdrawn, sad, irritable, tearful, et cetera.

And moreso when they've been daycared since birth, half are living with divorce and who knows how many of their parents are drinkers or dopers.

7 posted on 05/04/2004 6:17:58 PM PDT by Lizavetta (Savage is right - extreme liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John H K
I Ritalin what we are talking about? It is a well known fact that coke heads can make due with the occasional chopped up Ritalin.
8 posted on 05/04/2004 6:18:10 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBall
No, this article is not about Ritalin (which is not an antidepressant).

From the article:

The antidepressants that fall under the FDA's recommendation, which also are included in the Express Scripts survey, include Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Luvox, Celexa, Lexapro, Wellbutrin, Effexor, Serzone and Remeron.

I have nothing against antidepressants, they've certainly changed my life for the better. But I just don't think they're necessary for toddlers. I really think if a toddler is depressed, talk therapy should be the prescription, not drugs. A child's brain is still "working out the kinks" and growing at this stage of life, and I don't think antidepressants need to be added.

9 posted on 05/04/2004 6:22:24 PM PDT by DameAutour (It's not Bush, it's the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger
That's just it --- part of being a young child is to act sort of mentally ill --- I think people today have kids but didn't grow up with many younger siblings or cousins so they actually don't know what is normal behavior in a child. A two year old acts manic depressive because that's normal for them. A completely normal 8 year old can throw a big fit that would be crazy for an adult. Kids shouldn't be put on medications unless they have some really extreme symptoms and are carefully diagnosed.
10 posted on 05/04/2004 6:23:16 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBall
No, the article is about antidepressants, not Ritalin.

Antidepressants aren't "uppers." They're non-addictive. They don't get anyone "high." If you're not depressed, they don't have any influence on your mood at all.

If you go to your local bad part of town and try to buy some, no one will have any. Nobody breaks into doctor's offices to steal antidepressants. Every single physically addictive/high-inducing substance that exists has an illicit market for them. Antidepressants do not.
11 posted on 05/04/2004 6:24:31 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger
I would venture to say that most children of 20 years ago or more turned out better than the majority of children today.

Errr, it's those same children of 20 years ago who are the parents of these pre-schoolers.

12 posted on 05/04/2004 6:27:38 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DameAutour
"The antidepressants that fall under the FDA's recommendation, which also are included in the Express Scripts survey, include Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Luvox, Celexa, Lexapro, Wellbutrin, Effexor, Serzone and Remeron." That makes me feel better. Sometimes I wonder if the antidepressants do more harm than good. I'm sure they work for some people, but I would make antidepressants the very last choice before a strait jacket. I wonder how many of the school shooters back in the 90's were on antidepressants?
13 posted on 05/04/2004 6:29:16 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBall
That is probably too harsh, but still I would rather be depressed and get through it.
14 posted on 05/04/2004 6:31:25 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If you project that 9.2 growth rate into the future, you'll see that by 2050, all of America will be on drugs by preschool.
15 posted on 05/04/2004 6:33:39 PM PDT by JoeSchem (If the course is stupid, then staying the course is staying stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Yeah, that thought occurred to me as I was writing my post, which is why I included the "or more" part of it. I totally undertand that point, but I still stand by my earlier statement. BTW, I'm only 24 myself, so I'm not some old geezer out to rip the younger generation.

I actually believe that the farther one looked back in time, the more one would see a gradual increase in the overall mental health of the population. If I had time and the training, I would like to research a book on how the increase of moral ambivalence in recent years breeds a decrease in life skills. But that will have to wait until after I get the proper education.
16 posted on 05/04/2004 6:41:16 PM PDT by AQGeiger (Militant Islam is the gangrene among humankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Not only is this ridiculous but if those numbers are true, it is very, very frightening. What, someone please tell me, does a 2-year-old have to be depressed about that they would need to be on an antidepressant? Putting any child on such medication at such a young age is the highest form of abuse - mentally and physically. Would be interesting to see what kind of adults these doopy-head kids will turn out to be.
17 posted on 05/04/2004 6:45:33 PM PDT by Gerish (Choose God, he has already chosen you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Antidepressants aren't "uppers." They're non-addictive. They don't get anyone "high." If you're not depressed, they don't have any influence on your mood at all.

All true. However giving them to a child this young is just wrong. Especially without extensive studies.

Heck, you shouldn't even give a child honey before age two. Their system might not be able to handle it. Giving them anything but truly necessary medicines is foolish.

18 posted on 05/04/2004 6:56:55 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Te audire non possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gerish
I don't know, a two year old might have trauma after shitting the bed.
19 posted on 05/04/2004 6:59:33 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Well, it's another case of bad soldiers in the service of a good king.

It's probably dumb to give antidepressants to young kids, particularly if (as is all too often true) it's NOT by trained psychiatrists, but, (pretty typical for WND) the headline to the article is both uniformed and alarmist.

One thing to keep in mind is that the Scientologists are behind a lot of the attacks of antidepressants.....
20 posted on 05/04/2004 7:10:44 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson