Posted on 05/04/2004 9:34:07 AM PDT by The Other Harry
May 4, 2004
UCSC sociologist says making pot legal does not boost use
By ANNA GOSLINE
Sentinel Correspondent
SANTA CRUZ A leading critic of U.S. drug policy contends there is no link between the decriminalization of marijuana and increased drug use.
In research published in the May issue of the American Journal of Public Health, Craig Reinarman, a UC Santa Cruz sociologist, said he found there was no difference between drug-use rates in Amsterdam, where marijuana is freely bought at licensed coffee shops, and San Francisco, where pot-smokers still can get busted.
"Drug policy doesnt appear to have much relevance," Reinarman said in an interview Monday. "There is not a lot of evidence to suggest that criminalization has a deterrent effect."
In the late 1990s, Reinarman conducted random door-to-door surveys of 265 adults from San Francisco who had used marijuana 25 times or more. The research team, including two scientists from the Center for Drug Research in the Netherlands, then compared the data with identical survey information gathered from 216 adults in Amsterdam.
The results showed no difference between the cities for key factors such as age of first use, and age and duration of maximum use. Dutch marijuana users also were less likely to use other illicit drugs such as cocaine, crack, amphetamines or opiates such as heroin.
"It seems to us that the burden of proof is now on those that support criminalization to prove that it actually reduces drug use," said Reinarman, who won a lifetime achievement award from the Drug Policy Foundation in 1999.
Paul Armentano, a senior policy analyst at the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said he isnt surprised by Reinarmans results.
"The results (from similar studies) have been remarkably consistent, whether the study comes from university researchers or the government," he said. "Marijuana use ebbs and flows regardless of marijuana penalties. Thats the case in this country and frankly, in countries all over the world. Id like to think that if the drug policies were based on science, they would change."
But others on the front lines of the war on drugs, like Richard Westphal, commander of the Santa Cruz County Narcotics Enforcement Team, remain opposed to decriminalization.
"There would be increased usage and more people will try it," he said, arguing against decriminalization. Westphal believes criminal punishment does prevent people from using the drug excessively.
Rhonda Jones at Janus of Santa Cruz, a drug treatment center, agreed: "We believe that pot is a gateway drug. If a person smokes a lot of pot, they will likely try something stronger."
Jones also said addicts recovering from harder drugs such as cocaine or heroin will sometimes pick up marijuana, then slide back into their old habits.
Robert MacCoun, a sociologist at UC Berkeley, also has studied marijuana usage in the United States and the Netherlands. He said he saw a rise in marijuana use in the mid-1980s when legal marijuana sellers launched aggressive advertising campaigns. The Netherlands has since restricted these campaigns.
"We think that commercialization has the potential to significantly increase marijuana usage," he said, "but decriminalization poses very little risk.
"What we really need to understand is why countries like Sweden, who have restrictive drug policies similar to the U.S., also have low levels of drug use."
Contact Anna Gosline at agosline@santacruzsentinel.com.
Another of those strange, counterintuitive paradoxes that that the non-academic mind can simply not comprehend.
(steely)
"UCSC sociologist says making pot legal does not boost use ..." BUT, IT WOULD DROP MY COSTS A WHOLE BUNCH!!
So they won't be punished for acts that don't infringe on anybody else's liberties, and so we won't have to pay for that punishment.
Because it never should have been criminalized in the first place. It's not governments business.
I used to think that as well, but since the number of pot smokers isn't going to increase when it's legalized, why bother?
And if the government has no business criminalizing pot, why would they have any business taxing it?
This line of reasoning is not associated with other banned substances. You don't hear people say "Let's legalize thalidomide and tax it heavily!"
Oh, they CAN get busted in SF, but they hardly ever do. And if they do, it's barely a slap on the wrist. Not exactly a valid comparison.
I'll say this...
MJ is less harmful than booze.
The MJ that is available in Amsterdam is quite good. I would never have found the hotel room if one of us - which was not me -- had not stayed straight. Everything is a "gedracht", and they all look the same. I'd still be there.
Walking thru the red light district when you are ripped is an experience you will never forget. Surreal. There's no need to engage. Just looking is enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.