Skip to comments.
Bias Against Muslims up 70%
Washington Post ^
| May 3
| By Mary Beth Sheridan
Posted on 05/03/2004 12:03:13 AM PDT by Washington1980
Edited on 05/03/2004 2:51:42 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Muslims in the United States experienced more than 1,000 incidents of alleged harassment, violence and discriminatory treatment in 2003, a jump of 70 percent over the previous year, according to a report to be released today by a major Islamic advocacy group.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Technical; US: Washington; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; antiamericanism; cair; cairbias; conservativebashing; islamofascism; islamofascists; mediabias; muslimamericans; nationalsecurity; proterrorist; racebaiting; shillorganization; talkingpoints; talkradio; terror; terrorism; terrorists; waronterror; washingtonpoop; wot; wp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: tkathy
If they have no soul, how can they examine it?
To: Alouette
Heheh.
Good one.
70% is nowhere near enough.
42
posted on
05/03/2004 6:26:20 AM PDT
by
Stopislamnow
(There are no moderate muslims. They all want you converted, enslaved, or dead.)
To: All
The mooslims should ask themselves one question: What is the root cause of anti-mooslem bias? Only by addressing the root cause of bias, in much the same manner as the liberals wish us to address the root cause of terrorism, can they hope to....ah screw it. Maybe the folks from CAIR should just go look in the mirror.
We don't have to like Wahhabists who refuse to assimilate, and we don't have to pretend to like them, either. 1st amendment and all that.
43
posted on
05/03/2004 6:47:24 AM PDT
by
Belisaurius
("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)
To: Washington1980
Yeah right. That's a CAIR statistic.
44
posted on
05/03/2004 7:15:55 AM PDT
by
Bismarck
To: Washington1980
Gee, you think these guys could explain why?
To: backhoe
Thanks for the collection.
46
posted on
05/03/2004 5:40:03 PM PDT
by
bwteim
(Begin With The End In Mind)
To: Belisaurius
Right!
47
posted on
05/03/2004 10:34:15 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: Washington1980
Too bad they feel that way, they'll be are natural allies in the upcoming war with the EU.
48
posted on
05/03/2004 10:38:55 PM PDT
by
Porterville
(Kerry has no gravitas!!!)
To: Washington1980
If they wanted to increase their popularity they would be come very vocal against radical friends. I just do not see that happening.
49
posted on
05/03/2004 10:48:18 PM PDT
by
oyez
(Fortune favors the bold.)
To: oyez
I didn't used to be biased against Muslims. It's just that the more I find out about them, the less I like them. Not to mention 9/11, of course. I may turn into a downright bigot.
50
posted on
05/03/2004 10:56:51 PM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
To: Washington1980
Gee, a whole 1,000? Most of those could have happened because the people were AH's rather than because they were Muslims.
51
posted on
05/03/2004 11:06:24 PM PDT
by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: Beau Schott
|
Can a devout Muslim be an American patriot and loyal citizen? |
|
-
Theologically, no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia, turned monothistic.
- Scripturally, no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran.
- Geographically, no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
- Socially, no. Because his allegiance to Islam demands that he make no friends of Christians and Jews (Q. 5:51)
- Politically, no. Because he must submit to the mullah, who teaches annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan.
- Domestically, no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Q. 4:34).
- Religiously, no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islamintolerance (Q. 2:256).
- Intellectually, no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is established on Biblical principles, and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
- Philosophically, no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is dictatorial or autocratic except Turkey.
- Spiritually, no. Because when we declare one nation under God, the Christians God is a triune God, while the Muslims is one entity called Allah, who is never a heavenly Father, nor is he ever called Love in the 99 excellent names.
|
52
posted on
05/03/2004 11:31:41 PM PDT
by
antonia
("Democracy is the worst type of government, excepting all others." ~ Churchill)
To: Washington1980
Yes, and the point is?
In this free country of ours, we can choose whom to like and whom not to like.
53
posted on
05/03/2004 11:41:29 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
To: bwteim
54
posted on
05/04/2004 12:35:38 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(--30--)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson