Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Left Hijacks Indian History-Were Arabs really part of the American Indian tribes?
Frontpagemagazine ^ | 4-28-04 | David Yeagley

Posted on 04/28/2004 4:54:44 AM PDT by SJackson

Were Arabs really part of the American Indian tribes? That's what a new series of textbooks says

The Left Hijacks Indian History

By David Yeagley
FrontPageMagazine.com | April 28, 2004
A liberal advocacy group in Washington recently committed intellectual genocide on American Indians. Authors of the group presumed to fabricate Indian history, as if real Indian history doesn’t matter. Authors simply created an Indian story to suit the purposes of the advocacy group, and published it in a school text manual as fact.   

Sounds incredible, but the Middle East Policy Council published a 540-page book called Arab World Studies Notebook, a teacher’s guide for presenting Arab culture to young American students. The text, published five years ago, has a two-page chapter entitled, “Early Muslim Exploration Worldwide: Evidence of Muslims In the New World Before Columbus.” The text says Arab Muslim explorers were here in America before Columbus, and married Algonquin Indians. These early marriages produced descendents who, by the 17th century, became Algonquin chiefs, like “Abdul-Rahim and Abdallah Ibn Malik.” The Washington Times notes there is no evidence to validate the story.

 

The story is simply designed to give the Arabs a home in America, to make them part of the foundation of American civilization. The story was an attempt to make Arabs “indigenous.” 

 

The author and editor of Arab World Studies Notebook is Audrey Park Shabbas, the Teacher Workshop Leader of MEPC’s impressive educational program for grades 7-12. Shabbas, a Muslim convert and zealot, is a career advocate of Arabic culture. Executive Director of Arab World And Islamic Resources since 1995, she tirelessly champions the Arab Muslim “cause” in America. 

 

The story of Arab Muslim explorers and Indians is her collusion with Shayk Abdallah Hakim Quick, another Muslim convert (1970) and zealot for Islamic ascendancy like Shabbas. The internet does not reveal family background of either Shabbas or Quick, but Shabbas regularly decries the Anti-Defamation League, and apparently sued them for illegally obtaining information on Arab Americans.

 

But it’s okay for Shabbas and Quick to fabricate information about American Indians, because it’s they think it’s good cause. They want Arab Muslims to be more acceptable in a time. If Arabs can somehow be linked to the American Indian, they’ll be spared. They will have that special place, that unique validation, which will enable them to say Arab Muslims are the founding fathers of civilization in the Americas. 

 

"It is not, nor has it ever been, our intention to spread lies or untruths," said Jon Roth, Program Director of Middle East Policy Council. Of course not. The intent is merely to give a face lift to Arabs. Who cares if American Indians are used? Early Indian history is mostly oral tradition anyway. It’s open season for multiculturalists. Anyone can make up Indian stories, and include anyone in the Indian race. It’s everyone’s “civil right.” 

 

Why not make an Arab Indian tribe, get federal recognition, and create another casino? American Negroes do it all the time, and they certainly have no claim like Arab explorers would have. 

 

This free use of American Indian history by white liberals to promote Arab Muslims is the most presumptuous disrespect of Indians in history. Indians are relegated to myth, as if we didn’t really exist historically…or if we did, our history did not matter – we’re just a fantasy for anyone to use any time it suits. We’re a free talisman of racial, cultural validation. Just say you’re Indian, you’re in, at the deepest level. 

 

But this nonsense isn’t complimentary to Indians. This egregious fraud is abuse of Indians. Just pin that Indian name on yourself, and you suddenly belong to America. Shabbas pinned “Indian” on every Arab in history – including America’s worst enemies. 

 

Multicultural liberals obviously hate and disrespect Indians.

 

An Indian advocacy group exposed Shabbas’ chicanery. Algonquin Nation’s Peter DiGangi protested her text until MECP finally had to face the facts. Some 1,200 copies of the her book have already been circulated, but she promises to give “careful and thoughtful attention” to how exactly to break the news that she lied to all the trusting teachers who were given copies of the text.  

 

Maybe she should say the romance fantasy between Arabs and Indians was all sublimated sexual excitement. But should such personal indulgence be published as fact in professional secondary school texts?

 

Alas, exotic sexuality may be in her professional style. Last year Shabbas spoke at San Francisco University High School’s “Global Awareness” evening, which included homosexual advocacy. She has shown no offense by the association. One thing is certain:  Shabbas thinks feminism is advocated in the Qur’an. Now that’s super sexual fantasy!

 Let her keep her sexual hang-ups. But let her keep them from lying about American Indians in the nation’s textbooks.


Dr. David A. Yeagley is a published scholar, professionally recorded composer, and an adjunct professor at the University of Oklahoma College of Liberal Studies. He's on the speakers list of Young America's Foundation. E-mail him at badeagle2000@yahoo.com. View his website at http://www.badeagle.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: americanindians; arabworld; davidyeagley; education; indoctrination; rewrittinghistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2004 4:54:44 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
2 posted on 04/28/2004 4:59:43 AM PDT by SJackson (If she'd lived, Kopechne would be 62..Ted Kennedy would have brought comfort to her in her old age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This is going to sound very un-PC but... I've been wondering if the Pals are related to the old Amerindian tribes because the ululations and the love for blood, gore, and mutilation remind me of what the indians used to do to the pioneer families they would encounter on the plains.
3 posted on 04/28/2004 4:59:47 AM PDT by johnb838 ("I really don't care; they're all gonna die," US Marine in Fallujah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Maybe that explains the human sacrifice, cannibalism and other depravities of the continent's indiginous inhabitants.
4 posted on 04/28/2004 5:00:35 AM PDT by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838; SJackson; B4Ranch
You need to read American history - it was *not* the Indian who massacred the White man.

Originally, it was the American Indian who welcomed English and European settler into Virginia and South Carolina.

In fact, the settlers would not have survived had it not been for the generosity of the native indians.

Little is known of entire villages completely wiped out by settlers and soldiers as the settlers moved west.

Try again.

5 posted on 04/28/2004 5:04:33 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; dennisw; MeekOneGOP; B4Ranch; TrueBeliever9; Geist Krieger; JohnHuang2; Salem; Sanch; ...

"The story is simply designed to give the Arabs a home in America, to make them part of the foundation of American civilization. The story was an attempt to make Arabs “indigenous.”

These Islamic lies and propoganda fit perfectly in the pattern of Islam's 20 year plan to take over America.

Is America gullible enough to swallow it?

6 posted on 04/28/2004 5:09:03 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

If we didn't take over the west, England, France, or Spain would have.

7 posted on 04/28/2004 5:16:38 AM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
It is you who are ignorant. There are many resources on this subject which detail how bloodthirsty the Indians were. There were a backward, primitive, stone-age people who delighted in blood-letting, torture and cannibalism. I cut them no slack whatsover.

Read "A Few Acres of Snow" about the French and Indian Wars in North America. The Indians come out looking extremely bad. This is one resource. There are many others which detail despicable acts by Indians.

8 posted on 04/28/2004 5:17:07 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Are you saying the American Indians were bloodthirsty has any connection to Arabic inbreeding?
9 posted on 04/28/2004 5:19:08 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
This is about Arabic inbreeding with American indians, not who won the west.
10 posted on 04/28/2004 5:20:00 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
You need to read American history - it was *not* the Indian who massacred the White man.

Ah, yes, the "noble savage" myth emerges again.

There were excesses on both sides to be sure, but initially, the French Jesuits took advantage of the less-than-noble proclivities of the indiginous inhabitants to rain hideous, torturous deaths upon the men, women, and children of the Protestant settlers in the English colonies.

The natives delighted in the most barbaric tortures they could devise, eating the hearts and drinking the blood of the few who did not cry out for mercy during their hideous deaths.

Such excesses ignited a hatred for the indiginous inhabitants, setting the stage for ruthless behaviors among the settlers.

Perhaps you should try reading some source documentation. You can start with "Of Plymouth Plantation" and the works of Charles C. Coffin. Even Laura Ingalls Wilder provides some good documentation on the relations between the settlers and the Indians.

If you are still in doubt, you may want to read the accounts of the pacifist, non-resistant Amish and Quaker settlers who experienced firsthand the depravities of the "noble" savages.

11 posted on 04/28/2004 5:22:57 AM PDT by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It is far more ominous than this. There is a Muslim belief that once a land is Muslim, it is always Muslim, and they can go in and slaughter to regain it.
12 posted on 04/28/2004 5:29:36 AM PDT by tkathy (nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Public educators are stupid enough, they have to be tolerant, and "embrace" diversity. It does not matter if it is BS!
13 posted on 04/28/2004 5:34:33 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook; Happy2BMe
"Let's work together to stamp out political-correct (PC) ignorance in our lifetime."
(From Happy2BMe's profile page)

Ah, yes ... what better PC nonsense than the myth of the Noble Savage, unspoiled by civilization, living in harmony with the wilderness, at one with nature ...

14 posted on 04/28/2004 5:35:15 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Indians in the North East were very fond of Moose-Limbs.
15 posted on 04/28/2004 5:38:28 AM PDT by Redcoat LI ("help to drive the left one into the insanity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
I've been wondering if the Pals are related to the old Amerindian tribes because the ululations and the love for blood, gore, and mutilation remind me of what the indians used to do to the pioneer families they would encounter on the plains.

What they have in common is they are both pagan warrior cults. Both cults highly honor the warrior.

16 posted on 04/28/2004 5:38:34 AM PDT by dennisw (GD is against Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
old Amerindian tribes.....

Some were peaceful but the aggressive tribes were warrior cults.
17 posted on 04/28/2004 5:39:47 AM PDT by dennisw (GD is against Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Here is a little more food for thought about the lost tribes of Israel

http://www.geocities.com/hiberi/

18 posted on 04/28/2004 5:42:30 AM PDT by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
I dare you to walk onto an Indian Reservation - walk up to an Indian - and tell him his ancesors were Muslim.

I dare you.

19 posted on 04/28/2004 5:43:00 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Lets play Cowboys and Arabs.
20 posted on 04/28/2004 5:43:27 AM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson