Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/26/2004 6:38:51 PM PDT by YadaYada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: YadaYada
The CNSNews.com sources question whether the guidelines purportedly put in place by Gorelick in 1995 for Justice Department investigations were actually intended to shield President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore and top Democratic campaign fundraisers from the subsequent congressional investigations of the illegal fundraising activities.

Rings all too true, but the public at large will never hear this one.

2 posted on 04/26/2004 6:40:58 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building! Able to leap tall bullets in a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
There wasnt an honest man or woman in the entire Clinton administration.
3 posted on 04/26/2004 6:47:07 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
And now the Bush administration won't go after him either.
5 posted on 04/26/2004 6:51:12 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
alleged acceptance of donations

??

9 posted on 04/26/2004 6:59:39 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
The fundraising investigation involved the Clinton campaign's alleged acceptance of donations from operatives working for the People's Republic of China (PRC) as well as other foreign sources. But the Gorelick memo of 1995 prevented intelligence collected by U.S. agents overseas from being used in domestic criminal investigations

Okay. NOW we are connecting the dots.

This is so obvious that I can't believe it didn't come up sooner. This is the missing piece - - the answer to the question of WHY Gorelick erected "the wall", and ended up aiding and abetting in the terrorist murder of 3,000 Americans.

It had nothing to do with protecting "civil liberties", etc.

Clinton, Gorelick, et al, needed to obstruct the investigations into Clinton foreign fundraising and money-laundering. Well, duh - - it was right there in front of our faces the whole time. No wonder it was so important for the Democrats to get Gorelick on the 9-11 commission.

11 posted on 04/26/2004 7:04:29 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
To all those liberal scumbags who said "so what?" when confronted with Clinton's crimes this is the
smoking gun. As long as Xlinton gave handouts they would put up with his crimes . But the cover-up
also covered up the activities of the terrorists who hit us on 911 and no doubt in liberal New York
City allot of those who perished in those towers were some of the one's who said "so what? "
Cosmic justice for them but a lesson and a warning to the rest of us about the consequences of letting
a corrupt leader hold power
12 posted on 04/26/2004 7:08:43 PM PDT by Nateman (Socialism first, cancer second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
I don't know the song that well, but I bet the song "Jamies Got a Gun" could be parodied as "Jamies Gotta Go."
13 posted on 04/26/2004 7:15:28 PM PDT by feedback doctor (Freedom, God's gift to man, Clinton the devil's gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: backhoe
(( PING ))

The noose is tightening around the Clintons.

14 posted on 04/26/2004 7:20:50 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
I'm still kinda new here, and trying to catch up on the news that's missing from the news. This is news to me, and my head is reeling from it. I don't want to believe it. You go through life with certain realities, and those realities do not include anything like what I just read. I'm going to have to read it again, because I don't believe it could have said what I think it said. Here are some snippets that jumped out at me.

The fundraising investigation involved the Clinton campaign's alleged acceptance of donations from operatives working for the People's Republic of China (PRC) as well as other foreign sources. But the Gorelick memo of 1995 prevented intelligence collected by U.S. agents overseas from being used in domestic criminal investigations.

Does that say what I think it says? No way!

Another DoD official, who requested anonymity, explained in an interview with CNSNews.com that, "the PLA (People's Liberation Army) used front companies to buy U.S. defense high technology and influence in the U.S. government." In many cases, the source said, "the operatives were dealing directly with the White House."

What?!

Leitner said one of the most important investigations hindered by the Gorelick memo involved a Chinese state-owned corporation's activities after it had purchased a McDonnell Douglass high-tech machine tools factory in Columbus, Ohio.

The factory, known as Plant 85, had previously been used to manufacture the bodies of U.S. Air Force C-17 strategic transport planes and MX intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Leitner told CNSNews.com that he informed the federal prosecutor in the case that the CATIC license was approved over his objections because of "pressure from Vice President Gore." That testimony, however, was never heard in court.

The vice president of the United States commits treason, and it isn't the most prominent talk on every news program? Am I misinterpreting this?

15 posted on 04/26/2004 7:35:52 PM PDT by BykrBayb (5 minutes of prayer for Terri, every day at 11 a.m. EDT, until she's safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada; Eagle9; freedox; chesty_puller; GRRRRR; MouthOfTheSouth; Memother; ATOMIC_PUNK; ...
Hot Printer BUMP
16 posted on 04/26/2004 7:38:38 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
Hmmm...may well be the 911 families do have someone to sue...seriously-this is treasonous conduct
19 posted on 04/26/2004 7:48:27 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
The Clinton defense, or more accurately, explanation, for why he took money from the PRC was that he didn't realize that he was taking illegal funds - even though the FBI had warned him the PRC was planning on attempting to influence the election.

If in fact, as now looks likely, Clinton started setting up roadblocks to investigating such a crime so far before the election, there is little question that Clinton approved of the illegal donations. Further, this makes arguing against an explicit quid pro quo exceedingly difficult.

Why would China funnel Clinton so much money for nothing in return???

Overall this Gorelick memo, and Gorelick herself, really is becoming more and more the centerpiece of Clinton's failures and crimes.
21 posted on 04/26/2004 7:56:24 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
Of course this is true. Why it amazes anyone is beyond me. There are so many moles left in the government. We should return to the "spoils system". that way the majority would have some control over the bureaucracy.
23 posted on 04/26/2004 8:12:50 PM PDT by timydnuc ("Give me Liberty, or give me death"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
I have always thought the real author of the "wall" is Hillary Clinton.
26 posted on 04/26/2004 8:28:19 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: calcowgirl
((ping))

Don't miss this one.
33 posted on 04/27/2004 12:26:19 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
Reverse GorelickBUMP

Reverse Gorelick

by Mia T, 4.15.04

e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.

Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.

Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

Further confirmation of the Wall-as-cover-for-clinton-corruption thesis:

  • Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
  • Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect.

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

Filegate and the clinton Putsch,
committed in tandem,
the product of a careful criminal calculus,
at once empowered clinton
and disemboweled his opponents.
clinton was now free to betray with abandon
not only our trust,
but the Constitution as well.

The Common Man
Mia T
February, 1998


Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as-cover-for-international-clinton-crimes thesis.

Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualhillary.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

38 posted on 04/27/2004 1:48:54 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
You know, it's reports like this that just make me want to don a tin foil hat, dig a bunker, and just give up, as I wait for the coming anti-christ.

i.e.: DEPRESSING AS HELL.......with people like Gorelicker working "FOR" us, who the heck needs ENEMIES?!?
48 posted on 04/27/2004 7:33:53 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YadaYada
bttt
62 posted on 04/27/2004 10:47:48 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson