Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Classic View Wrong, Scientists Say, Huge Pots Of Magma Not Brewing Under Most Volcanoes
Science Daily ^ | 4-26-2004 | Univ North Carolina

Posted on 04/26/2004 4:36:22 PM PDT by blam

Source: University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

Date: 2004-04-26

Classic View Wrong, Scientists Say, Huge Pots Of Magma Not Brewing Under Most Volcanoes

CHAPEL HILL -- About 75,000 years ago, some scientists say, the last truly colossal volcanic eruption on Earth came close to wiping out all the primates, including humans. That eruption occurred when the Toba volcano in Indonesia exploded in an almost unbelievably shattering display.

Other people with a flare for the dramatic warn that a supervolcano underlying Yellowstone National Park could erupt in the not-so-distant future and push humanity to the verge of extinction. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill scientists say not to worry, especially anytime soon.

"It's not hyperbole to say that the biggest eruptions could bring an end to civilization," said Dr. Allen F. Glazner, professor of geologic sciences at UNC. "Such eruptions are evident in the geologic record, and the classic textbook picture of volcanoes implies that huge pots of magma are brewing under most active volcanoes today."

Happily, that traditional view is wrong, according to Glazner's latest research -- work conducted jointly with UNC assistant geology professor Dr. Drew S. Coleman and Dr. John M. Bartley of the University of Utah.

In two studies appearing in April issue of GSA Today and the May issue of Geology, the scientists present new insights into the potential for volcanoes to produce gigantic eruptions -- explosions thousands of times larger than the 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens.

"Although evidence for such massive eruptions is found throughout the geologic record, our investigation of magmas frozen below long-extinct volcanoes in California's Sierra Nevada led us to conclude that the largest eruptions are significantly less likely than many people believed," Glazner said.

In their investigation, team members studied magma bodies that cooled beneath the land's surface. Those bodies, called "plutons" after Pluto, the Greek god of the underworld, are the chief building blocks of the Earth's crust, he said. Vast pieces of formerly molten rock, they contain many known rock and mineral resources.

"Much of Chapel Hill, for example, lies on the Chapel Hill Granite pluton and its associated volcanic rocks," the geologist said. "Most scientists picture plutons as solidifying from enormous underground blobs of molten rock known as magma that feed overlying volcanoes."

Typically, plutons are hundreds to thousands of cubic kilometers in volume. For that reason, geologists long assumed that huge stores of magma are commonplace active volcanoes, Glazner said. They also reasoned that the potential for truly catastrophic eruptions exists in many volcanically active areas.

"Our new work casts doubt on the assumption that gigantic eruptions should be relatively common," he said.

Glazner, Coleman and Bartley combined observations of the deep Earth provided by seismic waves produced during earthquakes with mathematical modeling of magma cooling and precise dating and field mapping Sierra Nevada plutons.

Because small percentages of liquid in a rock slow seismic waves dramatically, the waves are sensitive probes for the tiniest volumes of molten rock, Glazner said.

"However, even under active volcanoes, seismic waves show little evidence for big blobs of magma," Coleman said. "Our mathematical models indicate that if big magma chambers existed, they should solidify in less than a million years, but new high-precision age determinations completed here at UNC indicate that plutons can take up to 10 million years to form."

New field mapping demonstrated that plutons once thought to be thousands of cubic kilometers of homogeneous rock that cooled from a single magma reservoir preserve subtle evidence of a much slower, piecemeal assembly, he said.

The results suggest that plutons are likely to be built by a multitude of small molten intrusions over millions of years and that plutons are not like a closed can of food waiting to explode when heated, Coleman said.

"We conclude that volcanoes are more prone to chugging along, producing many small -- though still dangerous -- eruptions such as the 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens, rather than huge civilization-destroying eruptions," he said.

Former UNC College of Arts and Sciences students Walt Gray and Ryan Z. Taylor, now with the Southwest Research Institute and the U.S. Forest Service, respectively, contributed to the new work. The National Science Foundation supported it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: classic; godsgravesglyphs; huge; magna; scientists; view; volcanoes

1 posted on 04/26/2004 4:36:26 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; RightWhale; Renfield
Toba, Indonesia

When Toba blew 75,000 years ago, some say only 2,000-10,000 humans worldwide survived. This event still shows up in the human genetic record.

2 posted on 04/26/2004 4:39:51 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I feel so much better now.
3 posted on 04/26/2004 4:41:56 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong lam hanh huong di La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
So,what was/is the "classic view"?Frequent giant life-erasing volcanoes?I don't think so.Crowd control via straw man.
4 posted on 04/26/2004 4:45:20 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Uh oh, this is going to upset the "Yellowstone Supervolcano" theorists around here.
5 posted on 04/26/2004 4:45:54 PM PDT by johnfrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnfrink
"Uh oh, this is going to upset the "Yellowstone Supervolcano" theorists around here."

Yup. It's on a 600,000 years eruption cycle and it's presently 40,000 years overdue.

6 posted on 04/26/2004 5:03:12 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
A "600,000 year" eruption cycle based on THREE data points (2 million years ago, 1.3 million years ago, and .6 million years ago) and only TWO gaps between eruptions. That's hardly a "cycle" at all.

And the use of term "overdue" is fairly ridiculous, even aside from the fact that it's been 700,000 years between caldera blasts and it's only been 600,000 years. That's hardly a cycle, the spacing with that little data could be a fluke.

Actually from 150,000 years ago to 70 thousand years ago, over 1,000 cubic kilometers of lava were erupted at Yellowstone, albeit without the gigantic explosions of the previous caldera blasts; it's possible THAT already was the "fourth" eruption.

The chances of a caldera blast at Yellowstone in a given year, or even our lifetimes is vanishingly small.

One interesting thing is that for years Yellowstone has been held up as a classic example of a "hotspot" extending down to the mantle; seismic surveys have actually found there's no deep hotspot at Yellowstone at all, nothing extends to the mantle, it's all shallow...part of the fierce geological debates over hotspots right now.

7 posted on 04/26/2004 5:13:57 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam; *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; A.J.Armitage; abner; adam_az; AdmSmith; Alas Babylon!; ...
Gods, Graves, Glyphs
List for articles regarding early civilizations , life of all forms, - dinosaurs - etc.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this ping list.
8 posted on 04/26/2004 7:23:47 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
I wonder how much the original population was. I mean, did 90% of humans get killed? If 90% of todays humans were killed, tha means it might leave 6-7 hundred million people. More, or maybe less, depending on where it happened and what was affected.

I suspect a major catastrophe like that would kill more from secondary effects (global cooling, acid rain, starvation) than from the initial effect.
10 posted on 04/26/2004 8:25:31 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John H K
You seem well-informed. I have read reports about water temps, ground temps and the bottom of the lake rising dramatically recently. Any thoughts?
11 posted on 04/26/2004 9:06:03 PM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (I'll only vote for a candidate who is comforable with JEANS, a COWBOY HAT and a RIFLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John H K
I expect you to be debunking the melodramatic doomsayers (and well done, by the way), but I'm surprised to see the leftists at Chapel Hill doing so. Shocked even.
12 posted on 04/26/2004 9:09:48 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Damn! Stood up again!
13 posted on 04/26/2004 9:18:22 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John H K
I used to think that alot of chances were vanishingly small.

Some scientists went to some lake in Canada, and drilled core samples from the bottom of the lake. Core samples that included several ice age events.

From the pollen in the samples, the size of the mud particles, etc, they were able to figure out how long it took from the very first initial cooling until full-bore total glaciation covered the lake, and whatever streams fed it.

Verdict:

90 years.

So, we're probably safe. But you might want to buy your grandkids some of those cool parkas with the wolf lining around the hood.

14 posted on 04/26/2004 10:58:47 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Interesting link. I've been to this one:
http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/img_tongerhu.html
Hope to climb Ngauruhoe and Egmont some day.....
15 posted on 04/27/2004 5:28:37 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: djf
"I suspect a major catastrophe like that would kill more from secondary effects (global cooling, acid rain, starvation) than from the initial effect."

Starvation was probably the biggest killer. The earth went into a 'Dark Ages' for a number of years.

16 posted on 04/27/2004 6:28:31 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson