Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeasement Never Works-Many of us in Spain feel ashamed about our troop withdrawal from Iraq
Wall St Journal ^ | 4-26-04 | JOSE MARIA AZNAR

Posted on 04/26/2004 5:28:42 AM PDT by SJackson

The decision by the new Socialist government to pull out Spanish troops from Iraq is lawful. But it is also gravely irresponsible. It raises Spain's risks and worsens our foreign relations. It alienates us from our partners and allies and does not contribute to the foreign policy consensus that had been promised to us by the new government. It suggests also a lack of solidarity with the Iraqi people and is the best news possible for those who attacked Spain on March 11.

Many of us in Spain feel ashamed about the withdrawal of our troops. And many more of us are worried about the consequences of this decision for our security, and for the defense of our liberties in the face of terrorism.

The withdrawal decision, made on Tuesday, is wrong, even though it accords with a campaign pledge. Promises can be made mistakenly and this is one of them, because we are now worse placed internationally than before. Our security has diminished. We are weaker, as is our alliance with the oldest and most powerful democracies in the world. Weaker, too, is our alliance with the majority of those countries that will soon become our partners in the EU.

The Socialist government's decision has been a blow to the interests of Spain and the free world -- because we are leaving the place where we most need to be. We've withdrawn our presence, our collaboration and our ability to influence events in Iraq -- a country that has suffered under one of the cruelest dictatorships in history and which today suffers at the hands of terrorists and of those nostalgic for the tyrant. The Spanish government may have affirmed its commitment to Iraq's reconstruction, but it is a commitment that is scarcely credible, as it flies in the face of the facts. If the government wished to make a declaration of foreign policy principles, it could not have chosen a worse moment. It is hard to understand why so vital a decision was taken in such a hurry. Only opportunism, linked to an election scarred by terror, can explain a decision so far removed from Spain's interests.

The withdrawal of our troops is just what the terrorists wanted -- the terrorists who attack Iraqis in Iraq, and those who attacked Spaniards in Spain. They are the same. They want the same thing. They have the same objectives, one of which, without doubt, was the withdrawal of our troops. And now they have it. This is hardly the best step for us to have taken after the attack Spain suffered on March 11. Our message to the world is one of abandonment; we have also signaled the value of murder as a way to secure political objectives. If Spain is weaker as a consequence of our withdrawal from Iraq, the terrorists are now stronger. The government has taken the path of appeasement, which history shows to be the worst way to handle threats. Appeasement does not protect one from danger; instead, it fortifies the danger itself.

The government has given us no explanations other than that it is fulfilling an electoral undertaking. But if it has so much respect for our citizens, it might have taken the trouble to explain to them what alternatives are proposed other than that of a "commitment to Iraq's stability" and to "fight on the frontlines against terrorism." If the government wishes to strengthen democracy, its flight from its responsibilities to the defense of liberty is not reassuring.

The Iraqis, for decades, have been unable to express themselves in free elections. But we know, from several opinion polls conducted in the last months, that they are aware of the need for foreign troops as a guarantee of security against terrorism; and we know, also, of their desire for power to pass into the hands of a representative national authority. It's possible that the Socialist government, in withdrawing, is responding to the will of a good proportion of Spain's people; but nobody can say, without lying, that this is a friendly gesture toward the people of Iraq. What we are saying to them is that they cannot count on us. We are saying that we are not going to help them secure the liberties that we ourselves enjoy -- and that we are not prepared to take the slightest risk for them. Spain, too, had a transition to democracy -- luckily much more peaceful -- and we were grateful, then, to those who helped us from abroad. Now we deny that same help to those who need it.

Yet we are not dealing here only with help for the Iraqis. We are dealing, also, with security for our own citizens. The terrorists of March 11 did not attack us because of Iraq. In fact, according to investigations, they had begun to plot attacks in Spain as far back as October or November of 2002. If they later demanded our withdrawal from Iraq -- and from Afghanistan, too -- it was no more than criminal opportunism on the part of those who killed nearly 200 people in Madrid. And in spite of that -- even though this may not be the precise intention behind our withdrawal from Iraq -- we are giving them the fruits of that opportunism.

Is Spain prepared to concede everything asked of her by those who would use force, including her territory and her free way of life? And from whom will we seek help if we are attacked again? These are the questions that the Socialist government should have asked itself before taking so irresponsible a decision.

In his inaugural address, Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero spoke of a ruptured consensus in our foreign policy. But by his decision to withdraw our troops -- which is, I repeat, completely lawful -- he has not only distanced himself from the European and Atlantic consensus, but has done nothing to advance the cause of a consensus at home. He decided to withdraw troops before listening to his Council of Ministers, and told the press of his decision before he told parliament. And although the only explanation he has given is that he is "honoring his word," he is not even doing that, since he has not given the U.N. -- "or any other organization of a multinational character," to use his own words -- the opportunity to play a more active role in Iraq. Nor has he waited until June 30, the date on which sovereignty passes to the Iraqis.

The government of Mr. Zapatero should not be taken by surprise if, in future, Spain fails to secure essential support in the international democratic community. When someone abandons his post, he cannot expect to receive more support than he who remains. This factor should have been enough to make the government think harder before taking its decision.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: allies; allyspain; appeasement; appeasment; aznar; fallujah; iraq; multinational; spain; spanishtroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2004 5:28:43 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"...The government has taken the path of appeasement, which history shows to be the worst way to handle threats. Appeasement does not protect one from danger; instead, it fortifies the danger itself...."

Interesting that the media did not report the desecration of a policeman's body who had been instrumental in finding the terrorists, nor did they cover the demand made to the Vatican to institute Islamic worship in the cathedral in Cordoba right after the capitulation.

I think Spain is going to be hostage to more and more demands because weakness shown plays to the enemy's strength.
2 posted on 04/26/2004 5:33:57 AM PDT by OpusatFR (John Kerry - Cheezewhiz for the mind - marshmallow mush for the masses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
...it was no more than criminal opportunism on the part of those who killed nearly 200 people in Madrid. And in spite of that -- even though this may not be the precise intention behind our withdrawal from Iraq -- we are giving them the fruits of that opportunism.

Aznar is an honorable man. What a shame his party couldn't prevail over the fears of the day. May we continue to hear from him.

3 posted on 04/26/2004 5:34:34 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I read a comment in the Spanish press today that Zapatero has managed to end up closer to Al Sadr (who was "guaranteeing" a safe retreat for Spanish forces) than to Bush.

Al Sadr - what an ally for Spain. And I suspect that he'd probably be one of the "foreign leaders" who supports Kerry, too; I hope we never have to find out.
4 posted on 04/26/2004 5:35:40 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
Interesting that the media did not report the desecration of a policeman's body who had been instrumental in finding the terrorists...

It was widely reported in the Spanish press, but you're right, there was barely a peep about it here. I don't recall seeing anything, in fact, although I may have missed it.

As for the mosque situation, all I saw in the US was a gushing article about the poor deprived Muslims and how they were just trying to be accomodating (by asking instead of just blowing up the church, I assume). In Spain, however, their demand has not received favorable coverage.

5 posted on 04/26/2004 5:39:54 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Prime Minister Aznar's honorable goals and service aside, one can't help wonder if Spain will become the new France under the shoe maker?
6 posted on 04/26/2004 5:43:45 AM PDT by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
...What do you mean, "If Spain will become the new France." They already are!
7 posted on 04/26/2004 5:56:45 AM PDT by vanmorrison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Aznar is quite impressive. But when he says:

And from whom will we seek help if we are attacked again?

I'm inclined to say "France".

8 posted on 04/26/2004 5:58:12 AM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
May we continue to hear from [Aznar].

Yes.

9 posted on 04/26/2004 6:29:06 AM PDT by syriacus (Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out ALL terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
YOU VOTED FOR A ZAPO YOU GOT A ZAPO (ZERO)
10 posted on 04/26/2004 6:34:49 AM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
["And from whom will we seek help if we are attacked again?"

"I'm inclined to say "France".]

. . .they may seek; but they will not find.

11 posted on 04/26/2004 6:35:46 AM PDT by cricket (Terrorists are weapons of mass destruction. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
"I think Spain is going to be hostage to more and more demands because weakness shown plays to the enemy's strength."

. . .the simple truth of the matter.

12 posted on 04/26/2004 6:37:25 AM PDT by cricket (Terrorists are weapons of mass destruction. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
"Appeasement" wasn't always a dirty word or scorned. It was considered the rational policy during the so-called interwar years. It was only guys like Churchill who changed the perception I suppose. One of my pet theories as to why Umbrellas aren't authorized whilst in uniform (For the Army, all bets off on the Air Force) is because they are associated with Neville "Peace In Our Time" Chamberlain.
13 posted on 04/26/2004 6:37:39 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
btt
14 posted on 04/26/2004 7:14:48 AM PDT by presidio9 (Rangers Lead The Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; Alamo-Girl; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...

The decision by the new Socialist government to pull out Spanish troops from Iraq is lawful. But it is also gravely irresponsible. It raises Spain's risks and worsens our foreign relations. It alienates us from our partners and allies and does not contribute to the foreign policy consensus that had been promised to us by the new government. It suggests also a lack of solidarity with the Iraqi people and is the best news possible for those who attacked Spain on March 11.

Many of us in Spain feel ashamed about the withdrawal of our troops. And many more of us are worried about the consequences of this decision for our security, and for the defense of our liberties in the face of terrorism....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ JOSE MARIA AZNAR,  good guy.


15 posted on 04/26/2004 7:33:15 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl ("Evil is out there, and evil wishes to attack us." - Lt. Gen. J Vines, commander, 18th Airborne Corp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; vanmorrison; DustyMoment
Zapatero is the reincarnation of Nevillito Chamberlain. The Muslims invaded Spain in the 8th century. It took to around the middle of the 13th century for the Reconquista to drive them out. Zapatero has just moved to undo all that. For it is a sacred duty of Muslims never to give up previously conquered land.

"Christian resistance to the Muslim conquest began in the mountains of Asturias, where Visigothic nobles took refuge and joined the native mountaineers in opposing the invaders. Their leader was Pelayo (718-737), a Visigothic lord whose victory over the Muslims at Covadonga, around 722, later was hailed as the beginning of the Reconquista and the 'salvation of Spain.'" (Ency. Brit., 15th edition)

Truly, Spain today needs a Pelayo....Pelayo....Pelayo. NOT a Zapatero.
16 posted on 04/26/2004 7:33:57 AM PDT by mtntop3 ("Those who must know before they believe will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Viva Aznar!
17 posted on 04/26/2004 7:44:16 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
I think Spain is going to be hostage to more and more demands because weakness shown plays to the enemy's strength

Keep in the back of your mind that there have been contacts between the Basques and Hamas in the past, largely arms trading.

18 posted on 04/26/2004 7:45:39 AM PDT by SJackson (If she'd lived, Kopechne would be 62..Ted Kennedy would have brought comfort to her in her old age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I'll bet most of those Spanish soldiers do not appreciate being put in this position.
19 posted on 04/26/2004 7:45:53 AM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-Neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Good Guy ~ Jose Maria Aznar ~ Bump!

We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ trolls, terrorists, democrats and the mainstream media are sad ~ very sad!

~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~

20 posted on 04/26/2004 7:54:13 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson