How long will Jamie Gorelick remain untouchable?

[Visioneer]

Isn't it interesting that as long as Ms. Gorelick sits on the 9/11 Commission, she is exempt from having to testify to the 9/11 Commission and, in turn, answer for her actions to the American people.

Whether or not Ms. Gorelick recuses herself from time to time during these proceedings is irrelevant. What matters is whether or not she can and will be called to account for her knowledge about and her role in this whole matter.

If you haven't already do so, consider getting off the sidelines and calling for Gorelick's removal from the 9/11 Commission and, subsequently, her PUBLIC testimony...UNDER OATH.

Contact info for those of you who wish to make your thoughts about the Gorelick coverup known follows. Please post additional relevant addresses and telephone numbers where concerned citizens can send their comments.

The 9/11 Commission, via email, here: info@9-11Commission.gov

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States 301 7th Street, SW Room 5125 Washington, DC 20407

Washington Office* Tel: (202) 331-4060 Fax: (202) 296-5545 info@9-11Commission.gov

New York Office Tel: (212) 264-1505 Fax: (212) 264-1595 info@9-11Commission.gov

Congressman Tom DeLay Majority Leader Office H-107 The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 p. (202)225-4000 f. (202)225-5117

Congressional Office 242 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 p. (202)225-5951 f. (202)225-5241

[jocon307]

"But what do I know?"

I don't know, but you spin a mean conspiracy theory. I'll agree with you this far, the whole African theatre of Islamic Jihad is very over looked.

And Rawanda was a disgrace to the world. And bill clinton. Who can beleive he had the gaul to apologize for it? Does anyone think God's gonna buy that phony apology?

[CyberAnt]

And .. while you're at it .. please mention that the fact they want Monsoor Ijaz to speak in private is because they DON'T WANT HIS TESTIMONY TO BE PRIVATE - AND NOT UNDER OATH.

Since we know what Monsoor is going to say - was also know that Clinton gave his testimony private - and not under oath. Therefore, it's a he said, he said situation - in private. But .. if Monsoor is in PUBLIC - then Clinton has to answer for Monsoor's testimony.

Very clever of them. But after Tom DeLay's scortching statement today, I think Kean may be forced to take charge and do what's right for the public and not the DEMOCRATS. And .. I don't think Tom DeLay would have said anything so harsh unless the WH was in agreement.

[CyberAnt]

There always has to be some idiot to make the bad guy look like a victim. Geeeeeeeez!

[CyberAnt]

"cannot share info with CIA"

Hmmmm? According to the Patriot Act, they can now!

[PISANO]

How long........

As long as she remains a Democrat!

[CyberAnt]

Yep! This was a Hillary plan. I believe they didn't think Ashcroft had the guts to de-classify the document - they just keep underestimating these people at their own peril.

[CyberAnt]

#22 - say what?

I think I got my tongue caught in my eye tooth and I couldn't see what I was saying.

So .. I'll try one more time: "the fact the dems want Monsoor Ijaz to speak in private is because they DON'T WANT HIS TESTIMONY TO BE PUBLIC - AND UNDER OATH.

[CyberAnt]

See #27 for clarification of #22 - Sorry!

[hope]

Does she have the Clinton Teflon suit of armor?

[Samwise]

[dgallo51]

Being married to HRC means never having to mean it whenever you say your sorry. I truly believe Clintons are the real reason we have people flying airplanes into buildings, but then I fly around in black helicopters with tin foil on my head.

[cricket]

"I want this duplicitous woman's head on a plate, and I want her butt in the witness chair. . .'

I love that. . .and yes for sure "Her actions, now and then, demand a resignation and an explanation, respectively, and we should keep up the pressure until we get both those things"

I have sent several e-mails of protest as well to this Commission. And I will continue to write and write. . .I mean, we know the arrogance of the Demrats; this really is not a surprise; but how it warps and taints everything they do/say brings a one renewed appreciation for who they are.

What needs to be the surprise here; is our committed response to this "insult-added-to-injury kangaroo Commission. . .because those who died on 9/11, deserve better and so do we.

[ladyinred]

I have been calling, emailing and faxing, and all to no avail. This commission is determined to make a mockery of our system, laws, and our war on terror. They don't care what we think, obviously.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

I think they have been exposed for what they are.

[fishbabe]

dems will now use this as their postion...if you sit on a commision and you knew something,it will be okay not to say anything and get yourself off the hook...if your opposition finds the incriminating evidence,they can't touch you cause your on the commision....it will be called the gorelick manuever....dems will be borking republicans while they wrap themselves around the gorelick manuever.....

[Smartass]