Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How long will Jamie Gorelick remain untouchable?

Posted on 04/16/2004 3:23:18 PM PDT by Visioneer

Isn't it interesting that as long as Ms. Gorelick sits on the 9/11 Commission, she is exempt from having to testify to the 9/11 Commission and, in turn, answer for her actions to the American people.

Whether or not Ms. Gorelick recuses herself from time to time during these proceedings is irrelevant. What matters is whether or not she can and will be called to account for her knowledge about and her role in this whole matter.

If you haven't already do so, consider getting off the sidelines and calling for Gorelick's removal from the 9/11 Commission and, subsequently, her PUBLIC testimony...UNDER OATH.

Contact info for those of you who wish to make your thoughts about the Gorelick coverup known follows. Please post additional relevant addresses and telephone numbers where concerned citizens can send their comments.

The 9/11 Commission, via email, here: info@9-11Commission.gov

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States 301 7th Street, SW Room 5125 Washington, DC 20407

Washington Office* Tel: (202) 331-4060 Fax: (202) 296-5545 info@9-11Commission.gov

New York Office Tel: (212) 264-1505 Fax: (212) 264-1595 info@9-11Commission.gov

Congressman Tom DeLay Majority Leader Office H-107 The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 p. (202)225-4000 f. (202)225-5117

Congressional Office 242 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 p. (202)225-5951 f. (202)225-5241


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: gorelick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 04/16/2004 3:23:18 PM PDT by Visioneer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
It's a sad situation.
2 posted on 04/16/2004 3:25:26 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
Dear Commission Chairs:

Ms. Gorelick has lied to you and everyone else on the Commission. How can you trust her with anything else?

Sincerely,

AGYG

3 posted on 04/16/2004 3:26:04 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
It's a lose, lose situation for the commission -- and the American people.
4 posted on 04/16/2004 3:30:32 PM PDT by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
bttt
5 posted on 04/16/2004 3:32:54 PM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Yes -- Jamie Gorelick needs to be OFF the Commission and the Commission needs to be stopped. Now. I am inundating my Senators and others in Congress -- Bill Frist, Rick Santorum, Tom DeLay -- and my local Reps too. It is way out of hand, and We the People are paying for this travesty. THanks for posting all the faxes and phone numbers. They are truly 'fiddling while Rome burns,' for don't think for a minute that OBL and al-Q are taking a break from THEIR plans while the Senators navel-gaze.
6 posted on 04/16/2004 3:33:43 PM PDT by bboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
HOW LONG WILL JAMIE GORELICK REMAIN UNTOUCHABLE? Who wants to touch her besides Janet Reno.
7 posted on 04/16/2004 3:37:58 PM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Here's mine:

There are a lot of people in this country right now who wrongly believe that the President and his administration were opposed to an investigative commission into 9/11 because they feared discovery of sinister secrets.

The fact of the matter is that the President and his administration rightly believed that such an exercise would be an unproductive circus preceding a critical election watched by the entire world, and that could not be more evident than it is right now.

The longer Ms. Gorelick sits on this Commission and not before it, the more the legitimacy of your purpose diminishes and evaporates into insignificance.

8 posted on 04/16/2004 3:40:21 PM PDT by onehipdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
It'll take as long as it takes the Republicans to censure Senator Dodd for his insensitive racial remarks praising KKK Robert Byrd. ...you see how quick they acted on that.
9 posted on 04/16/2004 3:41:46 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
Latest Google: 18,800 hits for Jamie Gorelick.
10 posted on 04/16/2004 4:00:20 PM PDT by onehipdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
Just heard on ABC radio news that the FBI is investigating death threats made against Gorelick.
11 posted on 04/16/2004 4:04:40 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
Thanks for posting again; some people may be missing these addresses!

For those that have already written; please write again! And for those that have not; please do!

12 posted on 04/16/2004 4:11:17 PM PDT by cricket (The Democrats and the terrorists have a common enemy. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket
Cricket, I wrote to Kean at the info@ address; I am somewhat gratified to read in the American Spectator today that he asked her to "consider" resigning, although she refused.

I think we need to lean on the dem side too. I understand from the threads that Dashcle appointed her (and all the dems, Bush appointed the pubbies), now he is still an ELECTED official, and presumabley somewhat more sensative to public opinion.

Hopefully this will get a lot of "jaw-jaw" on the Sunday shows, my suggestion is that Monday we hit the phones to Daschle, Kerrey (maybe call the New School in NYC, his home base, or e-mail the commission to his attention as I did to Kean the other day) and start to lean on that side too.

I want this duplicitous woman's head on a plate, and I want her butt in the witness chair. The Spectator says she is there to protect Clinton and damage Bush, and maybe some would say that leaving here where she is thwarts that plan best. But I am not that partisan. Her actions, now and then, demand a resignation and an explanation, respectively, and we should keep up the pressure until we get both those things.
13 posted on 04/16/2004 4:35:56 PM PDT by jocon307 (The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Visioneer
It will probably be over by Monday morning. She will receive tons of criticism over the weekend. I heard today that several fellow 9-11 Commission members were shocked that she had authored the memos currently under scrutiny, so it's now only a matter of time until she falls on her sword for Bill Clinton and Janet Reno.
14 posted on 04/16/2004 4:36:28 PM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
"Just heard on ABC radio news that the FBI is investigating death threats made against Gorelick."

Yeah? Well we can least be assured they can't share their information with the CIA...

THANKS TO HER!

15 posted on 04/16/2004 4:40:46 PM PDT by DJ Frisat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa
"who wants to toucjh her besides janet reno?"

garafalo?
16 posted on 04/16/2004 4:45:04 PM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Her sitting on the commission was part of the Clinton defense...if you really want to know where Clinton is sooo vulnerable...it's his Central African policies...9/11 is just a smoke screen to distract all the new revelations of Clinton's African adventures. As for Ms. Jamie...she's just another Susan McDougal...Clinton was using her to keep his own misadventures from full view. Richard Clarke was loading Tutsis and moderate Tutus into killing zones and then into refugee camps in neighboring Zaire. Blood diamonds for the Clinton's reelection campaign is my theory, to funnel illegal campaign contributions. This 9-11 Commission is a smoke screen. But what do I know?
17 posted on 04/16/2004 4:54:06 PM PDT by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN FRANCE'S ATRORCITIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Her actions, now and then, demand a resignation and an explanation

It would make my day to see her give a press conference where all the media questions are "Will you apologize to the American people and the victims of 9/11?" (I can dream, can't I?)

18 posted on 04/16/2004 4:54:37 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
"who wants to toucjh her besides janet reno?"

garafalo?

Isn't she a close friend of Hillary's?
19 posted on 04/16/2004 4:54:53 PM PDT by OldEagle (Haven't been wrong since 1947.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
LOL, yes, you have a dream, and I share it.

Now, with 6 right numbers we might be getting somewhere!
20 posted on 04/16/2004 6:05:26 PM PDT by jocon307 (The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson