unfans... DOUBLE PLUS UNGOOD!
Posted on 04/16/2004 4:55:54 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Katie Couric put together a double-headed gag-a-thon on this morning's Today Show.
First, an interview with Terry McAuliffe (AKA "America's Most Loathsome Man") - RNC head Ed Gillespie being allowed along for the ride. Then, an exclusive interview with Her Hillaryness Herself.
Consider the implications of Katie's opening question to McAuliffe: "How much does Kerry's early support for the war in Iraq hamstring his ability to criticize it now?"
Is she a journalist, or a Democratic strategist, worrying and game-planning how Kerry might work around his vote for the Iraq resolution?
The Loathsome One proclaimed that "Bush has had a disastrous week," throwing in for good measure that "he lied." McAuliffe must have a stipulation in his DNC contract: "you may not make a media appearance without accusing President Bush of being a liar."
After McAuliffe bloviated on interminably, Katie eventually deigned to let Gillespise get in a word edgewise. But rather than asking a substantive question, she totally took her cue from McAuliffe, and in the best tradition of the "gotcha" journalists at W's press conference asked "So you don't see this as a disastrous week for the President? Why?" [And when did W stop beating his wife, by the way?]
McAuliffe went on to claim that the "the talk about coalitions is a joke. Some countries have just two soldiers there."
I thought Gillepsie used a clumsy emotional tactic to respond. Rather than simply laying out the facts of the coalition, he said "I don't think the mothers of soldiers who have died [from various foreign countries] think the coalition is a joke." That strikes me as more of a Dem debating tactic.
Then it was on to an "exclusive" Katie interview with Hillary. It was an excerpt from a longer interview to be shown on a Dateline show.
Katie began by asking: "You have a lot of fans, but also a lot of . . . ." She paused, obviously uncomfortable at the prospect of suggesting to Her Majesty that any of the serfs could be displeased with Her Exalted Serenisssima.
Hillary therefore 'helpfully' suggested a word herself for those unworthies incapable of seeing the transcendent wonderfullness that his Her Rodhamness: "unfans."
The two then burst into laughter like two best-friend fifth-graders at a sleepover. Somehow I don't see this happening in Katie's next interview of John Ashcroft. Instead, the question would be: "millions of Americans despise and fear you. Don't they have a point?"
The laugh-in continued: "If Kerry called and said [imitating a man's voice] 'Hill, I want you to be my VP candidate' would you do it?"
Giggles all around. Hillary said the answer would be no.
Couric set up her next question by claiming in a voice-over that Hillary had softened her view on the VRWC. You be the judge.
Q. "Do you regret saying VRWC?"
A. "The evidence has proven that it might not be a conspiracy, because it's right out in the open. But there's clearly a network with a radical right-wing agenda." Some softening!
Then there was this for an upchucker: "Do you dislike W personally?"
"No, not at all. After 9/11 I told him privately I would do anything to help because of my concern for what had happened." [Guess your 'private' generosity of spirit ain't too private anymore, huh Hill?] "It's just that I profoundly disagree with him about his vision for the future of the country." I'll bet.
I must admit that the final exchange was a challenge to my faith in the Almighty. Because if ever lightning should have struck someone for a bald-faced lie, this was it. Yet Clinton escaped unscathed.
Q. "Some people say that you don't want Kerry to win because that would mess things up for your run in 2008."
A. "People make a lot of money imagining what I think. I just don't think like that. I'm very happy doing what Im doing."
Consider the audacity of her response. The most cold-blooded, scheming, ambitious woman in American political history flatly denying that she even THINKS about how the current political situation could affect her own burning ambitions.
LOL!
That sounds like a very 1984 type of term from Big Sister. I guess I would rank as a doubleplusunfan. I better be careful though because unfans have a tendency to become unpersons.
As for McAulliffe; we know that from the top. . .down; there is no such thing as a 'class rat'.
McAulliffe cannot avoid being who and what he is. The cheap adjective is his best weapon; and truth is never a consideration. He/Clinton & Co., set the tone for the rats et al.
Since my loyal colleagues apparently aren't online this morning and in a position to defend me, I'll explain myself: I watch out of a combo of masoschism and the belief that it's worthwhile to keep tabs on what the liberal media are up to.
Definitely a Hall of Shame Today Show nominee.
unfans... DOUBLE PLUS UNGOOD!
Move over, Gandhi.
I agree. Somehow she has developed this rep as The World's Most Brilliant Woman, and I don't see it. Then again, she's a much more able politician than Kerry or any of the other Dems who were in the primary. We underestimate her at our peril.
Gandhi, yes. But with a good dollop of Mother Theresa, naturally, and let's not forget Nelson Mandela and for good measure a soupcon of Einstein! Oh, and with a hint of Martin Luther King, Jr., of course.
I knew it! I just knew that her perkiness would use that phrase. I must be psychic. ;o)
I'm now re-reading the book "Hell to Pay, the unfolding story of Hillary Rodham Clinton", by the late Barbara Olsen. For those who haven't read it, it gives excellent insight into HRC's dangerous mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.