Posted on 04/15/2004 9:44:12 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly
www.registerguard.com | © The Register-Guard, Eugene, Oregon |
||||||||
April 15, 2004 Poll shows Bush ahead in Oregon By Jeff Wright Strong anti-tax sentiment in Oregon could give President Bush the leverage he needs to claim the state's seven electoral votes in the presidential race, a new statewide poll conducted by the University of Oregon suggests. The survey of 444 registered voters shows Oregonians favoring President Bush over presumptive Democratic Party nominee John Kerry 47 percent to 45 percent - well within the poll's margin of error of 4.7 percent. Only 1 percent favored independent candidate Ralph Nader and 6 percent are undecided. Despite a 48,000-voter Democratic edge in party registration, the state appears "to be trending Republican," said Joel Bloom, a UO political scientist who directed the survey. His best guess why: taxes.
Voters in February rejected Measure 30, a statewide tax increase proposal, 58 percent to 42 percent - an even greater margin than the defeat of Measure 28, an earlier tax proposal, Bloom noted. He said he's somewhat surprised by the results, given Oregon's poor economy, ongoing difficulties with the war in Iraq and widespread national publicity of the 9/11 Commission investigating the Bush administration's surveillance efforts before the terrorist attacks of 2001. Bloom cautioned, however, that the survey is merely a "snapshot in time" and that what it suggests most of all is that the state's electoral votes are up for grabs. Democrats have carried Oregon in the last four president elections, though Al Gore beat Bush by fewer than 7,000 votes in 2000. The survey contradicts an earlier poll conducted in early March by Portland pollster Tim Hibbits that showed Kerry leading Bush 45 percent to 40 percent. Bloom speculated that coverage of Kerry's string of presidential primary victories at the time projected him "as a winner and successful guy, and that built up his positives." It's also possible that Kerry's numbers in Oregon have inched upward since the UO survey was completed last Wednesday - before more political bad news that prompted Bush to hold a rare news conference to defend his policies in Iraq and anti-terrorism efforts at home. Nader's poor showing in the survey, meanwhile, can only partly be explained by anti-Bush voters not wanting to "waste" their vote, Bloom said. The survey didn't mention Nader by name and represents only those who mentioned Nader by name, he said. He didn't include Nader because it's still unclear whether Nader will even appear on the ballot in Oregon, Bloom said. As a Green Party candidate, Nader won 5 percent of the presidential vote in Oregon in 2000, nearly double his nationwide percentage. Now running as an independent, he recently failed in Portland to attract the 1,000 supporters needed to qualify for a spot on the Oregon ballot. Other findings from the UO survey: Independents favor Kerry, 46 percent to 41 percent. But Bush easily beats Kerry in terms of party loyalty: 16 percent of Democrats say they'll vote for Bush, while only 5 percent of Republicans say they'll vote for Kerry. Kerry leads in the Portland area, 53 percent to 40 percent, while Bush leads elsewhere, 51 percent to 39 percent. No Lane County breakdown was provided. Bush leads among men, 50 percent to 43 percent. Kerry leads among women, 46 percent to 44 percent. Bush leads among voters between the ages of 18 and 44. Kerry leads among voters 45 and up, and among college-educated voters. No clear relationship was found between income and voting preference. Bush does better among "middle-class" voters earning between $40,000 and $70,000 a year, while Kerry leads among "upper middle-class" voters earning between $70,000 and $100,000. However, the state's poorest voters (below $25,000) favor Kerry, and the wealthiest (more than $100,000) favor Bush.
|
||||||||
|
"It's also possible that Kerry's numbers in Oregon have inched upward since the UO survey was completed last Wednesday - before more political bad news that prompted Bush to hold a rare news conference to defend his policies in Iraq and anti-terrorism efforts at home."
Well, they can always hope, I guess. This paper hasn't given it's presidential endorsement yet (they would say it's way too early), but most of us around are are fairly sure of who it will endorse.
But hey as I have said on other threads over the past few months, Oregon is in play this year!
(I'm your neighbor to the north).
Well, that explains why Nader is getting ONLY 1% in Oregon of all places
I believe that, historically, "undecided" tends to go heavily to the incumbent. Bush is looking landslide-ish.
Why would it be an indication of a blowout if a state that was a tie in 2000 -- decided by only 7000 votes -- swung the other way in 2004?
Not that there's anything wrong with Multnomah County leaving their main polling station open past closing. And those cars delivering votes by the bag-full wasn't really suspicious. Nor was Clinton hack and deputy secretary of state (the guy in charge of elections), Padddy McGuire, out of line when he publiclly assured Al Gore he 'would deliver Oregon."
No, if a voter can get past all that, there a lot of hanky panky that takes place here favoring Rats. And other than that, it's a wonderful place to live - now that the liberal infestation of the last decade is complete.
There are pros and cons to doing it this way. You get a result that is less a reaction to any single day's events, but you get a result that may already be slightly stale.
I expected Oregon to be competitive this year. So far no surprises, although I do wonder how Nader would have impacted the results.
Maybe, we'll see what happens as events unfold. There are encouraging things in this article, and I particularly liked this tidbit:
"Bush easily beats Kerry in terms of party loyalty: 16 percent of Democrats say they'll vote for Bush, while only 5 percent of Republicans say they'll vote for Kerry."
That goes a long way toward offsetting the Democrats' small advantage in numbers here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.