Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Warned of Attacks As Early As '95
My Way News ^ | 04-15-04 | JOHN SOLOMON

Posted on 04/15/2004 8:54:32 PM PDT by MamaLucci

CIA Warned of Attacks As Early As '95

WASHINGTON (AP) - The CIA warned as early as 1995 that Islamic extremists were likely to attack U.S. aviation, Washington landmarks or Wall Street and by 1997 had identified Osama bin Laden as an emerging threat on U.S. soil, a senior intelligence official said Thursday.

The official took the rare step of disclosing information in the closely held National Intelligence Estimate for those two years to counter criticisms in a staff report released Wednesday by the independent commission examining pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures.

That staff report accused the CIA of failing to recognize al-Qaida as a formal terrorist organization until 1999 and mostly regarding bin Laden as a financier instead of a terrorist leader during much of the 1990s.

But the U.S. intelligence official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the 1997 National Intelligence Estimate produced by the CIA mentioned bin Laden by name as an emerging terrorist threat on its first page. The National Intelligence Estimate is distributed to the president and senior executive branch and congressional intelligence officials.

The 1997 assessment, which remains classified, "identified bin Laden and his followers and threats they were making and said it might portend attacks inside the United States," the official said.

Philip Zelikow, executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, confirmed the 1997 warning about bin Laden but said it was only two sentences long and lacked any strategic analysis on how to address the threat. "We were well aware of the information and the staff stands by exactly what it says," he said.

The intelligence official also said that while the 1995 intelligence assessment did not mention bin Laden or al-Qaida by name, it clearly warned that Islamic terrorists were intent on striking specific targets inside the United States like those hit on Sept. 11, 2001.

The report specifically warned that civil aviation, Washington landmarks such as the White House and Capitol and buildings on Wall Street were at the greatest risk of a domestic terror attack by Muslim extremists, the official said.

Deputy CIA Director John McLaughlin testified Wednesday that by early 1996 his agency had developed enough concern about bin Laden to create a special unit to focus on his threat. "We were very focused on this issue," McLaughlin told the commission.

The commission's report did credit the CIA after 1997 with collecting vast amounts of intelligence on bin Laden and al-Qaida, which resulted in thousands of individual reports circulated at the highest levels of government. These carried titles such as "Bin Laden Threatening to Attack U.S. Aircraft" in June 1998 and "Bin Laden's Interest in Biological and Radiological Weapons" in February 2001.

Despite this intelligence, the CIA never produced an authoritative summary of al-Qaida's involvement in past terrorist attacks, didn't formally recognize al-Qaida as a group until 1999 and did not fully appreciate bin Laden's role as the leader of a growing extremist movement, the commission said.

"There was no comprehensive estimate of the enemy," the commission report alleged.

But the senior intelligence official said the commission report failed to mention that CIA had produced large numbers of analytical reports on the growth, capabilities, structure and threats posed by al-Qaida throughout the late 1990s and those detailed reports were distributed to the front lines of terror-fighting agencies.

The CIA most frequently provided these individual and highly detailed analyses to the White House Counterterrorism Security Group charged with formulating anti-terrorism policies and responses, the official said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaeda; binladen; bojinka; cia; clinton; clintonfailure; clintonfailures; knew; nie; sept11
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: MNJohnnie
info@9-11Commission.org will go ito a black hole.

The real address is info@9-11Commission.gov

21 posted on 04/15/2004 10:53:55 PM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SFConservative
Let's see, are they telling us that the same people who brought us Waco brought us 9-11? How could that be?
22 posted on 04/15/2004 11:01:50 PM PDT by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SFConservative
I was trying to be "discreet"....LOL~!
23 posted on 04/15/2004 11:19:00 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
Informative post. I've read some about project Bojinka here on FR. Thanks.
24 posted on 04/15/2004 11:23:08 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SFConservative
Got me fired up enough to send the following - feel free to plagiarize but not verbatim so we don't get branded as just a bunch of mass-mailing zombies:

Dear Governor Kean:

I understand the need to be collegial and maintain a working relationship among the Committee members. However, it was apparent to some of us at the beginning (I suspet that includes you) that Commisioner Jamie Gorelick had such a major role in the executive branch, dealing with the very issues that may be factors in our vulnerability to terrorism and making crucial decisions regarding our intelligence defenses, that she is conflicted to the point that her input to the Commission's judgement cannot be trusted as balanced, non-partisan, and unbiased.

I know that your insistence on her recusal on a majority of issues or her resignation from the Commission would carry significant personal, political, and procedural risks. However, it seems to me that you, as the Chair, have a responsibility to make the tough decisions necessary to protect the integrity of the Commission and the process by which it investigates the events leading up to the 9-11 attacks. Learning meaningful, rather than politically correct and press-friendly lessons is key to taking corrective actions that will be able to reduce risk of similar attacks in the future. If "politically correct" procedural barriers and machinations contributed to a lack of awareness of the risks and specific precursors to the attacks, this would be a critical lesson for the nation to learn. Learning it would be impossible if we coddle the perpetrators of the philosophies that established the barriers in the first place.

I don't want to judge Commissioner Gorelick based on press reports and web discussion group chatter. But if the prevailing observations have a chance of being correct, you as the Chair should act immediately to suspend her participation until such time as her apparent conflict of interest has been resolved and she has had an opportunity to satisfactorily explain her past actions under oath as a witness before the Commission.

Thank you for your important work and protecting the 9-11 Commission's integrity.

[real name, address & phone number]

25 posted on 04/15/2004 11:28:36 PM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
The news in this area is getting sweeter every day.

Every single thing the democrats have campaigned with is blowing up in their faces.
26 posted on 04/16/2004 1:41:22 AM PDT by Preachin' (Why become a democrat if I have to lie to do it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
This should put the blame for 9-11 directly on the shoulders of the Clinton Administration. Bill Clinton, Janet Reno and Jamie Gore-Lick should all be behind bars...In the same cell, no less.
27 posted on 04/16/2004 6:51:56 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
If Clinton/Gore/Clarke/Reno/Gorelick did their jobs 9/11 would have been prevented. Yet, this so called commission will find a way to blame GWB instead of making sure another 9/11 never happens again.
28 posted on 04/16/2004 7:17:44 AM PDT by AngieGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
How many have forgotten this?!
plane+white+house+south+lawn

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FACTS
THE SEPTEMBER 12, 1994 PLANE CRASH

On Sunday, September 11, 1994, after spending an evening with his brother consuming alcohol and smoking crack cocaine, Frank Eugene Corder asked his brother to drop him off in the vicinity of Aldino Airport in Churchville, Maryland. Corder walked to the airport and found the keys to a Cessna P150 airplane that had been returned to the airport earlier that day after having been rented by another individual. Although Corder was not a licensed pilot, he had taken several lessons in the aircraft and had flown it several times during the summer of 1993.


29 posted on 04/16/2004 7:36:21 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Pardon me, but I thought you might like a ping to see your work on display.
30 posted on 04/16/2004 7:38:47 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
I checked in Keywords for “Operation Bojinka” and didn’t find anything close to the following. There was a huge roar over the August 6, 2001, PDB. I have heard nothing about another PDB, in the late summer of 1996. It was titled “Operation Bojinka”, and as way of explanation, I’m quoting from Dereliction of Duty, Lt. Col. Robert “Buss” Patterson, USAF (Ret.). Page 139:

“During the summer of the 1996 attacks, I myself learned first hand that the administration knew that terrorists were plotting to use commercial airliners as weapons. The president received a PDB every morning. It was a document encased in a smart leather folder, and emblazoned with the presidential seal, that contained the president’s daily intelligence update from the NSC. A senior NSC representative normally delivered it to the president. On weekends, at Camp David, and on vacations, the military aide was responsible for delivering and retrieving the brief.”

“One late-summer Saturday morning, the president asked me to pick up a few days’ worth of PDBs that had accumulated in the Oval Office. He gave them to me with handwritten notes stuffed inside the folders and asked that I deliver them back to the NSC.”

“I opened the PDB to rearrange the notes and noticed the heading “Operation Bojinka.” I keyed on a reference to a plot to use commercial airlines as weapons and another plot to put bombs on US airliners. Because I was a pilot, this naturally grabbed my attention. I can state for a fact that this information was circulated within the US intelligence community, and that in late 1996 the president was aware of it.”
31 posted on 04/16/2004 8:17:03 AM PDT by Maria S (Assigned parking only...all violators will be towed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
The commission's report did credit the CIA after 1997 with collecting vast amounts of intelligence on bin Laden and al-Qaida, which resulted in thousands of individual reports circulated at the highest levels of government. These carried titles such as "Bin Laden Threatening to Attack U.S. Aircraft" in June 1998 and "Bin Laden's Interest in Biological and Radiological Weapons" in February 2001.

Gee, that sounds a whole lot more specific than "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S."

32 posted on 04/16/2004 11:53:10 AM PDT by kennedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngieGOP
If Clinton/Gore/Clarke/Reno/Gorelick did their jobs 9/11 would have been prevented. Yet, this so called commission will find a way to blame GWB instead of making sure another 9/11 never happens again.

That's why this Commission should be disbanded. GWB is hard at work making sure another 9/11 never happens again. This commission is good for nothing and their little plot to blame the Bush Administration is backfiring in a big way.

33 posted on 04/16/2004 12:00:32 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
clarke was probably working for the state dept at the time
34 posted on 04/16/2004 12:01:22 PM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

Nostradamus warned of attacks in 1566 - Ignored by Bush


35 posted on 04/16/2004 3:12:46 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
bttt
36 posted on 04/16/2004 6:05:43 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson