Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Warned of Attacks As Early As '95
My Way News ^ | 04-15-04 | JOHN SOLOMON

Posted on 04/15/2004 8:54:32 PM PDT by MamaLucci

CIA Warned of Attacks As Early As '95

WASHINGTON (AP) - The CIA warned as early as 1995 that Islamic extremists were likely to attack U.S. aviation, Washington landmarks or Wall Street and by 1997 had identified Osama bin Laden as an emerging threat on U.S. soil, a senior intelligence official said Thursday.

The official took the rare step of disclosing information in the closely held National Intelligence Estimate for those two years to counter criticisms in a staff report released Wednesday by the independent commission examining pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures.

That staff report accused the CIA of failing to recognize al-Qaida as a formal terrorist organization until 1999 and mostly regarding bin Laden as a financier instead of a terrorist leader during much of the 1990s.

But the U.S. intelligence official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the 1997 National Intelligence Estimate produced by the CIA mentioned bin Laden by name as an emerging terrorist threat on its first page. The National Intelligence Estimate is distributed to the president and senior executive branch and congressional intelligence officials.

The 1997 assessment, which remains classified, "identified bin Laden and his followers and threats they were making and said it might portend attacks inside the United States," the official said.

Philip Zelikow, executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, confirmed the 1997 warning about bin Laden but said it was only two sentences long and lacked any strategic analysis on how to address the threat. "We were well aware of the information and the staff stands by exactly what it says," he said.

The intelligence official also said that while the 1995 intelligence assessment did not mention bin Laden or al-Qaida by name, it clearly warned that Islamic terrorists were intent on striking specific targets inside the United States like those hit on Sept. 11, 2001.

The report specifically warned that civil aviation, Washington landmarks such as the White House and Capitol and buildings on Wall Street were at the greatest risk of a domestic terror attack by Muslim extremists, the official said.

Deputy CIA Director John McLaughlin testified Wednesday that by early 1996 his agency had developed enough concern about bin Laden to create a special unit to focus on his threat. "We were very focused on this issue," McLaughlin told the commission.

The commission's report did credit the CIA after 1997 with collecting vast amounts of intelligence on bin Laden and al-Qaida, which resulted in thousands of individual reports circulated at the highest levels of government. These carried titles such as "Bin Laden Threatening to Attack U.S. Aircraft" in June 1998 and "Bin Laden's Interest in Biological and Radiological Weapons" in February 2001.

Despite this intelligence, the CIA never produced an authoritative summary of al-Qaida's involvement in past terrorist attacks, didn't formally recognize al-Qaida as a group until 1999 and did not fully appreciate bin Laden's role as the leader of a growing extremist movement, the commission said.

"There was no comprehensive estimate of the enemy," the commission report alleged.

But the senior intelligence official said the commission report failed to mention that CIA had produced large numbers of analytical reports on the growth, capabilities, structure and threats posed by al-Qaida throughout the late 1990s and those detailed reports were distributed to the front lines of terror-fighting agencies.

The CIA most frequently provided these individual and highly detailed analyses to the White House Counterterrorism Security Group charged with formulating anti-terrorism policies and responses, the official said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaeda; binladen; bojinka; cia; clinton; clintonfailure; clintonfailures; knew; nie; sept11
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
The CIA most frequently provided these individual and highly detailed analyses to the White House Counterterrorism Security Group charged with formulating anti-terrorism policies and responses, the official said.

Pointing the finger back at Richard Clarke?
1 posted on 04/15/2004 8:54:35 PM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Hold up. Still just rumor and innuendo. This "unnamed source" could be either lying or a figment of the "journalists" mind. I sure want to believe that Richard Clarke will get nailed for this but with out cooberation, it is just hearsay.
2 posted on 04/15/2004 9:02:26 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
They will have cooroboration when Gore-lick takes the stand under subpoena.


(Or not.)
3 posted on 04/15/2004 9:07:03 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Have you read your Bible today ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
They will have cooroboration when Gore-lick takes the stand under subpoena.

Have you sent your daily email to info@9-11Commission.org today demanding Gorelick resign and testify? Got to hold these bozos feet to the fire. It would be cosmic justice if Gorelick squealed on Clark!
4 posted on 04/15/2004 9:11:14 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Despite this intelligence, the CIA never produced an authoritative summary of al-Qaida's involvement in past terrorist attacks, didn't formally recognize al-Qaida as a group until 1999 and did not fully appreciate bin Laden's role as the leader of a growing extremist movement, the commission said.

This all such bogus tripe.

In 1998 bin Laden was indicted by US Attorneys for the bombings and mass murders in Kenya and Tanzania and as part of the background to the indictment he and al Qaeda were discussed as well as the agreement between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein to cooperate with regard to weapons development.

There is no way the US Attorney's office that wrote the indictment could have worked fully independently of the CIA and FBI and State for that matter to write such an indictment.

All this chatter and politicizing is a dog chasing its tail or like spinning around in circles.

5 posted on 04/15/2004 9:11:26 PM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Hey, I'm just guessing that that is what's being insinuated here, it's kind of hard to follow. I do think Clark was the White House Counterintelligence guy during that time.
6 posted on 04/15/2004 9:14:19 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
>> I do think Clark was the White House Counterintelligence guy during that time.

And I'll add I'm almost certain Clinton was President (though it'd be hard to tell from the lamestream media accounts of testimony that discusses events in that time frame).

7 posted on 04/15/2004 9:57:09 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (Going partly violent to the thing since Nov. 25, 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dave in Eugene of all places
Yes, the late 90's.
8 posted on 04/15/2004 9:59:59 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
From wikipedia.org:

A report from the Philippines to the United States on January 20, 1995 stated, "What the subject has in his mind is that he will board any American commercial aircraft pretending to be an ordinary passenger. Then he will hijack [the] said aircraft, control its cockpit and dive it at the CIA headquarters."

Clinton and Clarke had this information available to them for six years yet did nothing about it.

9 posted on 04/15/2004 10:23:03 PM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave in Eugene of all places
And I'll add I'm almost certain Clinton was President

Well, in Clinton's defense, he was busy boinking fat interns and wasn't as adept at compartmentalizing his private life from his public life as we were led to believe. < /sarcasm>

10 posted on 04/15/2004 10:24:38 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
That's a great find.....wonder if it will end up in the 911 Omission's report?
11 posted on 04/15/2004 10:26:22 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
lookee post #9
12 posted on 04/15/2004 10:28:36 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Isn't that about the time frame that Klinton was suffering from "post-coital fatigue."
13 posted on 04/15/2004 10:30:05 PM PDT by wingster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
And this will be still be Bush's fault right, because maybe in 1995 he was considering running for President?
14 posted on 04/15/2004 10:34:38 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wingster
Isn't that about the time frame that Klinton was suffering from "post-coital fatigue."

More like Carpal Tunnel Syndrome........................
15 posted on 04/15/2004 10:36:06 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
It would be funny if it wasn't so darned serious! :)
16 posted on 04/15/2004 10:38:10 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
This is my third email of the day thank you very much! I see the link, I gotta respond! :-)
17 posted on 04/15/2004 10:41:17 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
LOL, but let's not forget who was really in charge of policy in that white house shall we? You don't really believe Bubba was do you?
18 posted on 04/15/2004 10:42:44 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Isn't that about the time frame that Klinton was suffering from "post-coital fatigue."

More like Carpal Tunnel Syndrome........................

Or maybe Post-Sinkum Depression?

19 posted on 04/15/2004 10:44:55 PM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
That's a great find.....wonder if it will end up in the 911 Omission's report?

The most damning thing about Bojinka is that it was the genesis of 9/11. However, there were many more signs that the Mudslimes were interested in kamikaze attacks with airliners. Throughout the 1990s, the intelligence community found plots:


20 posted on 04/15/2004 10:45:04 PM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson