To: MamaLucci
Hold up. Still just rumor and innuendo. This "unnamed source" could be either lying or a figment of the "journalists" mind. I sure want to believe that Richard Clarke will get nailed for this but with out cooberation, it is just hearsay.
2 posted on
04/15/2004 9:02:26 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans)
To: MNJohnnie
They will have cooroboration when Gore-lick takes the stand under subpoena.
(Or not.)
3 posted on
04/15/2004 9:07:03 PM PDT by
Delta 21
(Have you read your Bible today ?)
To: MNJohnnie
Hey, I'm just guessing that that is what's being insinuated here, it's kind of hard to follow. I do think Clark was the White House Counterintelligence guy during that time.
6 posted on
04/15/2004 9:14:19 PM PDT by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson