Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sept. 11 Commission Members Defend Gorelick
Fox News ^ | Thursday, April 15, 2004 | Greg Kelly and Anna Stolley

Posted on 04/15/2004 9:39:35 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:36 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911commission; farcehearings; gorelick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: bcoffey
This is as arrogant as it gets, right up there w/Kerry grilling critics on their vote or constantly whining "You aren't listening to me" if someone disagrees.

This is the PEOPLE'S business.
61 posted on 04/15/2004 10:44:12 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Related thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1118161/posts

Was anyone here aware that airlines were being fined by the department of transporation for searching more than two arabs at one time?
62 posted on 04/15/2004 10:51:32 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
...airlines were being fined by the department of transporation...

Yes, and there's more...

The FAA had conducted a test of the 'Kennedy Gates' at Logan International (extra wide to allow Ted to clear the upright rails). In 9 out of 10 attempts, DOT agents were able to smuggle knives and other weapons through the security gates...the VERY same gates that would later be used by the terrorists, who ALL boarded their planes at Logan International). A letter was written to Sen. John Kerry (of all people) explaining the dangers raised by the test results. Disposition: forwarded to DOT IG...File 13.

63 posted on 04/15/2004 11:07:23 AM PDT by O Neill (When Johny bin Kerry comes marchin' home: Who cares? Who cares?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
We should start spelling her name Gore Lick.
64 posted on 04/15/2004 11:27:18 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
"I think she's a valuable member," added Democratic commissioner Tim Roemer (search), a former U.S. representative from Indiana. "I think nobody has worked harder on this commission than Jamie Gorelick."

Maybe Gore is not the only one that received ...

65 posted on 04/15/2004 11:31:23 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Very important to find out who ordered this "wall" and WHY. My suspicion is that it was put in place to keep hidden the Clintons' connection to a lot of dirty activity. Gorelick "worked for" Janet Reno, who reported to who?

Gorelick happily built walls where she wanted them and ignored them when she wanted....No wall here....

http://www.alamo-girl.com/0251.htm

… president Clinton ... made a thwarted attempt to obtain the counterintelligence information about what the FBI had learned of the Communist Chinese influence on the presidential election in November of 1996.

Charles Ruff... contacted ... Jamie Gorelick and wanted to know what federal investigators knew or suspected about Chinese illegal contributions to the presidential campaign.

...Freeh learned of the White House probe by Gorelick, he ordered the information not be provided to Clinton, ...

...Freeh had left Washington on a trip to the Middle East. In his absence, attorney general Janet Reno and Gorelick quickly moved to obtain the secret FBI files.

Before the Justice Department turned over the FBI files to Clinton's legal counsel, Robert Bryant, then head of the FBI national security division, picked up the telephone and informed Freeh of Clinton's probe for the secret files on the Chinese investigation. Freeh ordered the files withheld.…."


66 posted on 04/15/2004 11:48:11 AM PDT by syriacus (Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out all terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Write a Letter Demanding that John Kerry Testify Before the 9/11 Commission
67 posted on 04/15/2004 11:48:53 AM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcoffey
Tom Kean is a complete wussy. he should be the first to resign, and the president should appoint someone who has balls!
68 posted on 04/15/2004 11:51:58 AM PDT by frogandtoad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
This one makes me sick. Actually defending her.
69 posted on 04/15/2004 11:55:44 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The only difference between Kerry and a broken clock is that a broken clock is right twice a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
What a bunch of GORE-LICKERS!!!!!!!!!
70 posted on 04/15/2004 11:55:59 AM PDT by Polyxene (Never hold discussions with the monkey when the organ grinder is in the room.- Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
They expose what a mockery our government has become.

What our government became under Slick Willie's administration. I'd like to think we're now on the mend...thanks to the great leadership of President Bush.

71 posted on 04/15/2004 11:57:27 AM PDT by O Neill (When Johny bin Kerry comes marchin' home: Who cares? Who cares?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The whole commission is a sham, its pointless and very likely dangerous. Naming Gorelick to the commission is indefensible, allowing her to remain is an outrage. She was the architect of the law that prevented relevant agencies from communicating with each other concerning terrorists and she sits on the sham commission enpaneled to investigate why relevant agencies were prevented from communicating with each other. What is wrong with these people, did they think we wouldn't notice ?????

BTW, the picture gets more entangled... Gorelick's present law firm, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, represents Prince al-Faisal al-Saud, in a lawsuit filed by a group of roughly 600, 9-11 family members.

72 posted on 04/15/2004 12:01:48 PM PDT by Darlin' ("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
2 contradictory statements by Lehman:

"she's one of the really savvy, nonpartisan of the bipartisan members"

"Certainly in the Rice hearings and the [Richard] Clarke hearings, a lot of the members got partisan"

Gorelick was one of the most partisan questioners during these hearing. Lehman admits members got partisan. Then he says Gorelick wasn't partisan.

73 posted on 04/15/2004 12:11:59 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeoPie
Daschle knew what he was doing appointing her...
74 posted on 04/15/2004 12:49:26 PM PDT by CharlieOK1 (kill a pregnant woman on the way to an abortion clinic =1 murder; on the way to the store=2 murders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baynative; shield
Daschle shielded Gore Lick from testifying by putting her on the panel! He must know she is a very weak link!

I've been saying as much for a few days now... Pretty clever, I must admit. Slimy, but clever.

75 posted on 04/15/2004 12:58:50 PM PDT by CharlieOK1 (kill a pregnant woman on the way to an abortion clinic =1 murder; on the way to the store=2 murders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Lehman is trying to cover his own butt. One thing the 9-11 Commission members agree upon. They hang together or they hang separately.
76 posted on 04/15/2004 1:08:16 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (Air America - at least Al Jazeera can pay their bills to stay on the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
This is soooo SICK!
77 posted on 04/15/2004 1:13:15 PM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson