Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2004 6:28:25 AM PDT by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pookie18
Bump!
2 posted on 04/15/2004 6:29:58 AM PDT by The Mayor (Death separates us for a time; Christ will reunite us forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Three guesses why they won't have him testify in public...If they call him at all. I know he's supposed to testify behind closed doors, but I bet the commission changes its mind.
3 posted on 04/15/2004 6:33:39 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Glad to hear Ijaz will be testifying.
5 posted on 04/15/2004 6:37:56 AM PDT by syriacus (Cyberterror experts Clarke+Gorelick kept terrorists who were disguised as electrons out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Did Ijaz work for the Clinton administration during this time period or was he a private negotiator, or some other role? The article doesn't say.
6 posted on 04/15/2004 6:38:55 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18; Admin Moderator
I realy think you should ask the mods to put this in breaking news.
13 posted on 04/15/2004 6:58:48 AM PDT by eastforker (The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Khartoum, April 19, 1997. After eight months of negotiations and countless dinners of Nile perch and soggy French fries, I persuaded Sudan's president, Omar Hasan el Bashir, to make an unconditional offer to share Sudan's intelligence data with the FBI and CIA. The offer, made at my request directly to the 9/11 Commission's vice chairman, former Congressman Lee Hamilton (D., Ind.), sat in limbo for months. Hamilton personally discussed the offer with Berger and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, with little effect.

Here we have a SECOND member of the committee who should be answering instead of asking questions.

Bombshell #1.

At around the same time in mid-February 1998, bin Laden's key Sudan deputy traveled to Baghdad to meet Saddam's intelligence chief. The Clinton White House was aware of both developments.

Bombshell #2.

16 posted on 04/15/2004 6:59:21 AM PDT by wayoverontheright (Hidetheweeniespeak-the native tongue of liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
"Khartoum, April 19, 1997. After eight months of negotiations and countless dinners of Nile perch and soggy French fries, I persuaded Sudan's president, Omar Hasan el Bashir, to make an unconditional offer to share Sudan's intelligence data with the FBI and CIA. The offer, made at my request directly to the 9/11 Commission's vice chairman, former Congressman Lee Hamilton (D., Ind.), sat in limbo for months. Hamilton personally discussed the offer with Berger and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, with little effect. "

Is a paragraph or sentence missing here? How would he make an offer in 1997 to a commission that was not yet formed for an event that had not yet occurred?

20 posted on 04/15/2004 7:08:31 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
When I testify under oath on May 7, 2004, in private with the commission's staff and commissioners

Looks like Ijaz is testifying....Yee ha.

25 posted on 04/15/2004 7:14:48 AM PDT by b4its2late (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
bttt
34 posted on 04/15/2004 7:31:06 AM PDT by Guenevere (..., .Press on toward the goal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Bump!
38 posted on 04/15/2004 7:52:13 AM PDT by aculeus (Law schools are America's madrassas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Mansoor Ijaz is a private citizen, is he not? If it's so blamed important for "the victims' families" to see government officials like Dr. Rice, whose public testimony is necessarily limited by the need to keep classified information secret, why are we not permitted to witness the testimony of a person not affiliated with the government who should not/would not have had access to classified information? Surely Mansoor could be advised not to discuss potentially classified matters (i.e. beyond the things he's already mentioned/written in public). This little bit of secrecy stinks to high heaven. If President Bush can be put under the microscope, why is X-42 immune?
50 posted on 04/15/2004 8:43:31 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
INTREP - 9/11
54 posted on 04/15/2004 8:49:18 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson