Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So what's wrong with clubbing seals?
The Telegraph ^ | 15/04/2004 | Boris Johnson

Posted on 04/14/2004 5:21:14 PM PDT by Eurotwit

I don’t know who handles the PR for these Canadian seal-clubbers, but it must be a hell of a job. Can there be any group, on the entire planet, that so excites the hatred of the British public? Not the Korean dog-eaters, nor the Italian butterfly-shooters, nor the Spanish goat-headyankers — no, not even the French, who, as we all know, eat our children’s ponies — no one can match the Canadian fisherman for provoking the Briton to tears of rage; and one can see why.

Here is a fellow who rises and puts on his great big waterproof boots and his great big waterproof hat. Then he picks up a horrible knobkerrie, studded with nails, gives his wife a loving kiss, and strides on to ice floes where he sets about him with a terrible Hutu-style slaughter. Bonk bash bonk he goes, like some demented axeman, and nothing will stop him. The telephoto lenses of the RSPCA cameras whirr and click.

Above him hover the helicopters chartered by the BBC, while live pictures of the horror are beamed into every living-room in this country. Does he care?

Does he hell. And it is not just any old beast that he brains, but a mammal, a creature like us that suckles its young; and it is a large, defenceless mammal, with both eyes in the front of its head, in that cute anthropomorphic way. It is a furry mammal, with a bark as winsome as any leal and faithful labrador.

One after another, biff thunk clunk, the Canadians are now beating these trusting little critters to death, thousands of them a day, until the snow runs red in that awful way we saw on the front of yesterday’s Independent newspaper.

Is there anyone who could possibly attempt to justify this kind of barbarity? Will anyone stand up for the seal cull? Well, ahem, at the risk of terminally alienating and offending animal-lovers across the country, it is the duty of this column — which ever puts logic above popularity — to have a go.

Of course, it must be a dreadful way to go, if you are a seal; and no one could seriously doubt that the method of killing is peculiarly brutal. But I put it to you none the less that the Canadian fisherman has as much right to go out clubbing as the average British 18-year-old.

It was a good thing that there was an outcry in the early 1980s; and it was a good thing that there was a consequent European Union-wide ban on seal fur products. But that was when the cull had so reduced the populations of harp and hooded seals that they were at real risk. That was when they killed the little white baby seals as well, which particularly outraged our sentimental feelings. The truth today is that there are now about six million of these seals, and they are not spending all the time lolling defencelessly on the ice. They are very efficient eaters of fish.

They eat 1.5 tonnes of fish a year each, and given that there are only 50,000 tonnes of cod left off Newfoundland and Labrador, you can see that the ecosystem is badly out of whack.

It is true that the waters have been crazily overfished by the Canadians themselves; but there seems to be good evidence that the voracity of the seals has created a predator trap, by which the fish find it impossible to breed faster than the seals can eat them. You could find what looks like a more humane way of bumping off the seals, such as shooting them. The trouble is that this method is barely more humane than clubbing, and the gunshot lead is expensive and not environmentally friendly.

And surely it makes sense, given how poor these fishermen are, to prevent the pelts from being torn apart by bullets. You may feel affronted by the scale of the slaughter; but I can’t really see a moral difference between authorising the killing of 10,000 seals and 350,000.

If it is really numbers of dead animals that shock you, let me remind you that every year we herd 1.5 million cows and 12.5 million sheep into the dark bellowing terror of dung-encrusted abattoirs, blap them with a bolt in the brain and then slit their throats. We don’t have Canadian camera crews hovering above our meat processing plants.

And if it is not numbers that concern you, but the principle of taking life, then let me remind you that 200,000 embryos are aborted every year in this country; and if you think that is irrelevant, let me remind you that, every year, in the People’s Republic of China, 20,000 sentient adult human beings are killed by the state. Isn’t that, on the face of it, a more natural subject for an Independent campaign?

I tell you why the seal cull speaks so powerfully to us. It’s telly, innit? It’s the shocking undisguisable picture of the lone killer on the ice floe, the graphic impact of the red on the white.

The seal cull provides a uniquely powerful image of what is in fact an everyday event: the violence of man against animals, and the slaughter of animals by man. It is the sheer conspicuousness of that killing that prompts, in our breasts, our exaggerated response: which I might compare, finally, with the agonies now being endured by those of us who supported the war in Iraq.

It looks like an utter disaster, if you rely solely on the television images, and you study the small-scale newspaper maps, with their pictograms of conflagration in every city. This week in The Spectator, we have a brilliant piece by Andrew Gilligan in Baghdad, full of despair at the dilemmas of the coalition troops.

Maybe I am a congenital optimist, but I can’t help wondering whether that is all there is to it, and whether those polls — which found so many Iraqis convinced that their lives had improved — were not also true. Television images of violence can create alarm. They can create outrage. But they are not always the whole story.

Boris Johnson is MP for Henley and editor of The Spectator


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: animalrights; canuckistan; fur; hunting; seals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-199 next last
To: NittanyLion
Yeah, as though what Pardek proposes isn't ten times more cruel than the Greenpeace allegations....sheesh.
61 posted on 04/14/2004 7:03:38 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

62 posted on 04/14/2004 7:03:41 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick ("If I could shoot like that, I would still be in the NBA" -- Bill Clinton, circa 1995)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
hehehe
63 posted on 04/14/2004 7:04:11 PM PDT by cyborg (Frakenfreude Radio... look out belowwwwwwwwwww!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
These beings are horrible that do this. I will not even call them human. I'm a christian and I think that I don't care if they go to hell! It's hard for me to say that. Sorry. They have no right to kill these defenseless(sp) cratures. LEAVE THEM ALONE! Get another job! EAT SPAM! SHAME ON THEM! I don't believe that God honors this act.
64 posted on 04/14/2004 7:05:06 PM PDT by felinesforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
Ecclesiastes Ch. 3 v. 18-22:

And then I realized that God is letting the world go on its sinful way so that he can test mankind, and so that men will see that they are no better than beasts. For men and animals both breathe the same air, and both die. So mankind has no real advantage over the beasts; what an absurdity! All go to one place- the dust from which they came and to which they must return. For who can prove that the spirit of a man goes upward and the spirit of animals goes downward into dust?

65 posted on 04/14/2004 7:05:18 PM PDT by rintense (Now I know why liberals hate guns... they keep shooting themselves in the foot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Ya' know, when it comes to LONG CUT, you should think about who you are talking to.

This man proudly serves his country EVERY DAY, while being separated from his wife (Mrs Cut) and very YOUNG SON (Short cut)!
As a matter of fact, just the other day he was contemplating what kind of TOY GUN to get for his little one who is not even old enough to do anything but drool one it! Sound like a raging liberal to me!
He is a TRUE conservative who promotes conservative causes daily as he surfs FR!
Check your facts...
Defending the HUMANE killing of animals does NOT mean that one disapproves of the killing entirely.

Why would you WANT to kill anything in a way that made it suffer....
BTW...I also don't promote burning ants with a magnifying glass or pulling the wings off of flies...just SLAP 'EM and get it over with!
66 posted on 04/14/2004 7:05:41 PM PDT by M0sby ((PROUD USMC WIFE!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion; Petronski
Hey - that moron said that his god proclaimed we may use these beasts - or is there more to how humans treat mammals...?
67 posted on 04/14/2004 7:05:52 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Why kill them at all? :(
68 posted on 04/14/2004 7:06:18 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick ("If I could shoot like that, I would still be in the NBA" -- Bill Clinton, circa 1995)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; Senator Pardek
Yeah, as though what Pardek proposes isn't ten times more cruel than the Greenpeace allegations....sheesh.

Exactly. We all know 12-day old seals haven't yet reached the age of consent... ;-)

69 posted on 04/14/2004 7:06:20 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
You're easily amused, aren't you? ;)
70 posted on 04/14/2004 7:06:44 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick ("If I could shoot like that, I would still be in the NBA" -- Bill Clinton, circa 1995)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: felinesforever
These beings are horrible that do this.

That do what?

Did you say 'eat spam!"? Have you ever been to a hog slaughter? A commercial hog farm?

But, I guess since seals are so cute and hogs are unsightly, that's just fine with you. I see.

71 posted on 04/14/2004 7:07:24 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
My point boils down to this:

"puts logic above popularity"

72 posted on 04/14/2004 7:07:29 PM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
yep :)
73 posted on 04/14/2004 7:07:43 PM PDT by cyborg (Frakenfreude Radio... look out belowwwwwwwwwww!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
"Personally, I am no big fan of the hunt, but I don't really care either way."

I cannot say that. Some things simply offend my sense of common decency and honor.

"What rankles me is hobby environmentalist that jumps upon a "popular" issue. Save the seals.. Save the whales... Ohh, they are sooo cute.. "

I am an Antisubmarine Warfare operator. I have spent countless hours listening to whales sing their songs over hundreds of miles. I've heard them call out, and recieve replies. Perhaps I'm biased, but I can find nothing in their killing to support. They are magnificent animals who never meant humans any harm, and do not feed or clothe us. Why kill them? Why stain our souls that way?

"There is a whole lot of suffering among the domesticated animals that we carnivours enjoy every day.

"If you were a vegan, I'd take your criticism serously"

I am not. As I said, we breed those animals specifically for our use. Few if any domesticated cattle, pork, or chickens could survive long in the wild, because we have bred them that way. Also, we make effort to be humane to them while they are alive. Moreso, obviously, than we do for the seals and whales, whom we DO NOT breed, and one of which species we came very near to wiping out.

If, however, you deign to ignore me based on that, I understand. Just think a little.

74 posted on 04/14/2004 7:08:07 PM PDT by Long Cut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Your perspective is rather, uh, bizarre. LOL Thanks for that.
75 posted on 04/14/2004 7:08:36 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Just a little attempt at humor...

Personally, I can't get too worked up about the killing of some seals. It just seems totally inconsequential relative to other events.

76 posted on 04/14/2004 7:09:59 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
protest the clubbing
because its so inhumane
veal scallopini
77 posted on 04/14/2004 7:10:05 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
Why kill them?

They eat our food supplies.

78 posted on 04/14/2004 7:10:26 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
It just seems totally inconsequential relative to other events.

Salut!

I could not have said it better. And your 'little attempt at humor' is quite welcome. I did in fact LOL.

79 posted on 04/14/2004 7:11:40 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Personally my opinon on this sort of thing would make me sound like a PETA nutter but at least I don't share the politics :)
80 posted on 04/14/2004 7:12:06 PM PDT by cyborg (Frakenfreude Radio... look out belowwwwwwwwwww!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson