Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashcroft: Blame Bubba for 9/11 - Rips panel member on espionage 'wall'
New York Daily News ^ | 4/14/04 | JAMES GORDON MEEK

Posted on 04/14/2004 2:45:21 AM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON - Attorney General John Ashcroft highlighted a bitter hearing on the 9/11 terror attacks yesterday by blaming the Clinton administration for intelligence failures that led to the catastrophe.

In a stunning salvo, Ashcroft pinned the "single greatest structural cause for Sept. 11" on Jamie Gorelick, a member of the 9/11 commission who served as former President Bill Clinton's deputy attorney general.

Ashcroft's accusation was part of a storm of finger-pointing during the televised hearing into intelligence failures that led to the 9/11 attacks.

Former FBI boss Louis Freeh and his agency came under scathing criticism for its fumbling of terrorism investigations.

"I read our staff statement as an indictment of the FBI," said panel chairman Thomas Kean, a Republican.

Other witnesses blamed Congress or Ashcroft for denying them funds and staff to fight Osama Bin Laden's followers, while some said bureaucratic infighting often left them ignorant of major developments and terror threats. The bickering, excuses and picture of a confused government before 9/11 were disheartening to families attending the hearing.

Kristen Breitweiser, a 9/11 widow, and Mary Fetchet, whose son Brad was killed, said they were left "speechless" by the spectacle.

Ann MacRae, a Manhattan mom whose daughter Kat died in the World Trade Center, said she found the former officials' excuses sickening. "I didn't like how my daughter's death was reduced to budget deficits," she said.

Ashcroft presented the most belligerent defense of his administration, laying much of the fault on the Clinton era Justice Department and particularly Gorelick.

As Gorelick sat smirking, Ashcroft aides handed out a declassified Justice Department memo authored by Gorelick that Ashcroft said erected a legal wall that thwarted terror probes by forbidding the sharing of information between criminal and intelligence agents at the FBI.

"We did not know an attack was coming because for nearly a decade our government had blinded itself to its enemies," he said. But Ashcroft repeatedly was challenged by other witnesses and panel members.

Republican commissioner Slade Gorton, a former Senate colleague of Ashcroft's who sat next to Gorelick, challenged him for saying the "wall" kept the FBI from stopping 9/11.

"If that wall was so disabling, why was it not destroyed during the course of those eight months [of the Bush administration]?" asked Gorton, who produced an August 2001 memo by an Ashcroft deputy that reaffirmed the wall separating intelligence and criminal case work.

Thomas Pickard, who was acting FBI director during the summer of 2001, alleged Ashcroft had expressed little interest in terrorism in the months before 9/11. The attorney general heatedly denied Pickard's comment.

Pickard also said that his appeal for more counterterror funds was rejected by Ashcroft on Sept. 12, 2001.

Lack of funds and staff to fight terror was a complaint by other witnesses.

Freeh said that when he sought to hire nearly 2,000 linguists and agents to fight Islamic terrorism, he was allocated just 76 new hires.

In defending his agency, Freeh said, "I would ask that you balance what you call an indictment, which I don't agree with at all, with the two primary findings of your staff: One is that there was a lack of resources, and two, there were legal impediments."

Former Attorney General Janet Reno said the FBI had bigger problems than money.

She complained that the FBI's infrastructure was so ancient that the bureau "didn't know what it had and that it didn't share the information."

Cofer Black, the CIA counterterror chief before 9/11, pounded his fist on the table as he pleaded with the commission to believe that agency "heroes" did everything they could to kill terrorists. "We gave it all we had," Black said. "We didn't have enough people to do the job, and we didn't have enough money by magnitudes."

Black added: "We are profoundly sorry. We did all we could. We did our best."

Originally published on April 14, 2004



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; aschcrofttestimony; ashcroft; gorelick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2004 2:45:21 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Three home runs in a row. Their last great hope is Clinton holdover, George Tenet. Prayers are still needed. Tenet's CIA has been a thorn in Bush's side, probably more so than the old leftist media. But if Tenet fails to deliver, I can't foresee anyone who can save their chestnuts.

Savage might think the Bush team is holding on like a loose tooth. I would respectfully disagree and say the analogy fits the left better. On the other hand, most people fight harder when their backs are to the wall. FReegards....
2 posted on 04/14/2004 3:06:55 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Backhoe's latest links: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1104239/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Amazing. Boston's local CBS TV affiliate mentioned the committee hearings yesterday, but nothing about 8 years of Clinton incompetence. Instead, what listeners got was that Ashcroft (probably lied), didn't highlight terrorism in a printed memo (it was in a paragraph under homeland stuff, not bulleted alone), although he 'claimed' terrorism was his top priority. This, in CBS's all knowing eyes, is proof the acting attny. gen.(Pickard), who'd accused Ashcroft of saying he was sick of hearing about terrorism and didn't want to talk about it anymore, was telling the truth. They did show a clip of an angry Ashcroft denying Pickard's statement, but didn't run it long enough to show details of proof that Ashcroft had held meeting after meeting on the subject and given speechs to that effect during that month.
3 posted on 04/14/2004 3:10:54 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Guess the FBI was too busy bailing out Yon Horiuchi at Ruby Ridge and the ATF at Waco to pay attention to real terrorists (like OKC, TWA, etc.)
4 posted on 04/14/2004 3:15:23 AM PDT by gracex7 (The LORD is not slack concerning His promise....but is longsuffering to us-ward. 2 Peter 3:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Reno - who was entirely responsible for both the "wall" in the FBI and the ambiguous CYA authorizations to "get" OBL (but don't kill him or it's your own fault) - was pitched a few softballs, then let off the hook because she claimed she didn't know what was or wasn't classified and suitable for discusssion.

Thus, the entire topic of White House dithering and the dashed efforts of the CIA's OBL task force never came to light. Despite being thoroughly outlined in Steve Coll's book Ghost Wars (Coll is Managing Editor for the Washington Post, his book published a few weeks ago).

5 posted on 04/14/2004 3:16:33 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I didn't get to see Janet waltz around with more lies. Her complaints that the FBI was hampered by ancient bureaucratic red tape, etc., is amazing. Why was she in charge if not to make things better? We all know why she was there and what she was told to do. We have her list of accomplishments, and funny, modernizing the bureau and making America safer doesn't show up. The gall of that idiot. Did anyone on the panel ask why she didn't even make sure the bureau had universal internet capability? Every American household with kids has it. Uh, but not the FBI. Okay. Moving right along....
6 posted on 04/14/2004 3:16:54 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Pickard also said that his appeal for more counterterror funds was rejected by Ashcroft on Sept. 12, 2001.

Previous news accounts say that AG Ashcroft denied the funds on Sept. 10, 2001. Is the Daily News not checking their facts again?

7 posted on 04/14/2004 3:18:49 AM PDT by rabidralph (Oh yes, Wyoming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Who picked the commision members?
8 posted on 04/14/2004 3:19:05 AM PDT by raybbr (My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"As Gorelick sat smirking, Ashcroft aides handed out a declassified Justice Department memo authored by Gorelick that Ashcroft said erected a legal wall that thwarted terror probes by forbidding the sharing of information between criminal and intelligence agents at the FBI."


This "The Commission" has in their midst the one who during the Clinton administration that controlled the "Justice Department". The most perverse administration in the history of this nation.

This "The Commission" replicate the old "Soviet" show trials, the only thing they have missing is leading out the Bush administration witnesses and publicly shooting them for the world to see.
9 posted on 04/14/2004 3:21:34 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
As Gorelick sat smirking, Ashcroft aides handed out a declassified Justice Department memo authored by Gorelick that Ashcroft said erected a legal wall that thwarted terror probes by forbidding the sharing of information between criminal and intelligence agents at the FBI.

That was an in your face testimony. I have to wonder why Gorelick is on the panel, and not in front of it.

10 posted on 04/14/2004 3:25:17 AM PDT by Preachin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
there is absolutely no way in the world that Gorelick should be a member of this commission. The conflict of interest is so obvious that it should be publicly challenged by the Administration.
11 posted on 04/14/2004 3:49:11 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We did not know an attack was coming because for nearly a decade our government had blinded itself to its enemies," he said

Did this man sleep through the Clinton years?

12 posted on 04/14/2004 3:50:27 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Preachin'
I have to wonder why Gorelick is on the panel, and not in front of it.
In other news, Scott Peterson was appointed judge in his own trial.

And in the Michael Jackson case, the Nation of Islam as been assigned the job of supplying the jury pool.

13 posted on 04/14/2004 3:51:36 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Kristen Breitweiser, a 9/11 widow, and Mary Fetchet, whose son Brad was killed, said they were left "speechless" by the spectacle.

Finally, some good comes from the work of the Commission.

14 posted on 04/14/2004 3:52:00 AM PDT by Dahoser (9/11---The Legacy of Clinton treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Isn't it interesting how the standards for "enough information" change. Bush should have know the details of what was coming based on old info that everybody has known 'Since 1997.' But Bush acts on strong info ( info that Iraqi officials met with one of the hijackers pre-9/11) then Bush is making assumptions.
I have digital cable TV. I am going to call my provider and have msnbc, and all cnn stations blocked. I hope some of you will do the same
15 posted on 04/14/2004 3:55:57 AM PDT by feedback doctor (we need more Bort license plates in the gift shop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I was stunned in the aftermath of 9/11 when Bush stood by Tenet and declared that he could not only effectively lead the CIA, but that he could walk on water and heal blind people too. I remember the moment when he gave him such strong support, it was a live press conference about the formation of the Homeland Dept.

Tenet is a miserable failure. Bush should have fired him when he took office, long before 9/11.

16 posted on 04/14/2004 4:05:58 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (I think the mistake a lot of us make is thinking the state-appointed shrink is our friend.Jack Handy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Someone in the Bush Administration had to come out swinging- it might as well have been Ashcroft. If there's one man they hate more than Bush and Limbaugh, it's Ashcroft. He wasn't going to gain any ground with them (not that he would want to) by being nice. If Bush wins in November, Ashcroft will probably be fillibustered until Kingdom Come by Senate Rats.
17 posted on 04/14/2004 4:11:19 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
And of course when Reno testified she used the old Clinton excuse that she didn't recall. That way they can't get her for lying under oath.
18 posted on 04/14/2004 4:13:53 AM PDT by chainsaw (http://www.hanoijohnkerry.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Preachin'
"I have to wonder why Gorelick is on the panel, and not in front of it."

You and most every other freeper.
19 posted on 04/14/2004 4:15:20 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( President Bush 3-20-04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Trent Lott and Tom Daschle
20 posted on 04/14/2004 4:17:48 AM PDT by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson