Skip to comments.
Clinton Caught Lying Again
Inside Politics -- The Washington Times ^
| April 12, 2004
| Greg Pierce
Posted on 04/12/2004 9:15:36 PM PDT by TBP
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:14:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Former President Bill Clinton last week told the September 11 commission that he never admitted passing up a chance to have Osama bin Laden arrested
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; arrest; binladen; clinton; clintontestimony; commission; hennen; impeachedx42; kerrey; klintoon; liar; newsmax; perjury; recording; september11; testimony; wday; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Wasn't he under oath when he testified to the commission? In that case, isn't this perjury? Let me be the first to call for his prosecution.
1
posted on
04/12/2004 9:15:41 PM PDT
by
TBP
To: TBP
I'll second that.
2
posted on
04/12/2004 9:22:03 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: TBP
Clinton has NEVER lied--never. And I tell you truly that he never will lie. You see, as a Democrat, he is subject to the "Standard of Truth," which states, in the words of the infallible William Jefferson Clinton, "It all depends upon what the definition of the word 'is' is." In other words, "is" can be construed so broadly as to mean "is not."
Sentences therefore devolve into meaningless psychobabble, because the words in the sentences must be interpreted so broadly as to deprive them of meaning. Of course, this means that calling Clinton before a commission is pointless; his book is devoid of any message; and his legacy is literally as clear as mud.
3
posted on
04/12/2004 9:23:35 PM PDT
by
dufekin
(Eliminate genocidal terrorist military dictator Kim Jong Il ASAP)
To: TBP
Wouldn't it be better to document when Clinton is caught in the truth.
4
posted on
04/12/2004 9:24:12 PM PDT
by
Parmy
To: TBP
"Clinton caught lying"
This is news?
5
posted on
04/12/2004 9:26:18 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Over 13,000 served.)
To: TBP
What does being "under oath" mean to x42????? (Answer: Nuthin')
6
posted on
04/12/2004 9:27:47 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Tagging you.....)
To: TBP
"Wasn't he under oath when he testified to the commission? In that case, isn't this perjury?."
Perjury ISN'T a crime if you are a Dem.! What are you thinking?!
BTW I agree with you.
7
posted on
04/12/2004 9:28:59 PM PDT
by
GottaLuvAkitas1
(Let's turn Iraqi sand into some useful glass!)
To: Parmy
Wouldn't it be better to document when Clinton is caught in the truth.FWIW, here's a bear not peeing in the woods.......
To: TBP
I don't believe he was under oath and - even if he was - Clinton always lies and (no surprise) he always lies under oath. That was why he was impeached (it wasn't about sex)
9
posted on
04/12/2004 9:30:38 PM PDT
by
Steven W.
To: kcvl
I don't think he was under oath. Wasn't that the lame excuse given of why Condi had to sware on oath in the public because the facts were in conflict?
Clinton should have his day sworn before the public. It's the least he can do to put this to rest.
10
posted on
04/12/2004 9:33:33 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: TBP
Wasn't he under oath when he testified to the commission? No, der Schlickmeister was not under oath. Neither he, nor the President and Vice-President will be asked to testify under oath.
11
posted on
04/12/2004 9:33:44 PM PDT
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: hole_n_one
That is too good!!
ROFLMAO!
FWIW, I think documenting when Klintoon is caught telling the truth would be easier.
Still laughing much Later!
Cheers!
12
posted on
04/12/2004 9:34:19 PM PDT
by
SZonian
(Say what you mean, but don't say it mean.)
To: hole_n_one
ROFLMAO!!!
13
posted on
04/12/2004 9:36:12 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: hole_n_one
FWIW, here's a bear not peeing in the woods....... You've out-done yourself now.
FUNNY, FUNNY.
14
posted on
04/12/2004 9:38:50 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold)
To: TBP
This filthy Clymer will not only lie until the day he dies, he'll have another whopper engraved on his tombstone (the one I
will go out of my way to relieve myself on).
To: SZonian
Welcome to FR, Sarge!
To: swheats
It wouldn't matter, in the least, if he was under oath. He could care less because he never thinks anyone will challenge him and they usually don't. The man is a pathological liar and most everyone knows it but they give him the benefit of the doubt anyway. Bob Kerrey, in fact, is the very person who called him a "extremely good liar".
17
posted on
04/12/2004 9:40:18 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: TBP
"Clinton caught lying again"
How do we know if Clinton is lying?
Check to see if his lips are moving..
18
posted on
04/12/2004 9:41:55 PM PDT
by
blastdad51
(Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
To: swheats
Hi, swheats!
It's been awhile since I've seen you posting.
I'm thrilled to see you!
To: kcvl
The man is a pathological liar 1992: "I will not raise taxes on the American People to pay for my programs." 1993: Retroactive tax hike.
20
posted on
04/12/2004 9:45:49 PM PDT
by
Dataman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson