1 posted on
04/08/2004 4:33:17 PM PDT by
Jean S
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: JeanS
The former president was "forthcoming and responsive," said the commission. Let's remember this quote and compare it with what's said after President Bush meets with this circus.
To: JeanS
Commissioners said Clinton addressed "big-picture" policy issues, including his administration's response to the October 2000 al-Qaida attack on the USS Cole What f@@@ing response!!!
3 posted on
04/08/2004 4:36:13 PM PDT by
grb
To: JeanS
"The panel said it didn't plan to release specific details of the meeting (because it was classified)"
BUT .. WHEN THEY INTERVIEWED CONDI IN PRIVATE (because most of it was classified) - BEN-VENISTA WAS ALL OVER THE TV SPEWING WHAT SHE SAID - AND PRIOR TO THAT HE LEAKED IT TO HIS JOURNALIST FRIENDS.
4 posted on
04/08/2004 4:36:20 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: JeanS
With Condi's excellent testimony today, I wonder how this will have an effect on Hillary's chances at a run for the Presidency? If anything, Condi has the class to answer questions and conduct herself in a professional manner. None of this "I don't recall" business. Am glad the media covered it today as it just shows how pompous some of these people were/are.
5 posted on
04/08/2004 4:36:48 PM PDT by
hsmomx3
To: JeanS
I'm feeling pretty dense here. Why is his information "classified" and not Condi Rice's?
To: All
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
7 posted on
04/08/2004 4:37:44 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
To: JeanS
Why isn't Bubba volunteering to testify in public, under oath?
I thought we wanted a full and open investigation to save lives in the future?
Well, I'm sure he had a good reason for wanting to testify in private.
I'm sure it was "for the children".
8 posted on
04/08/2004 4:38:45 PM PDT by
VOA
To: JeanS
Yes, notice how this same DNC directed organization AP is screaming for the Aug 6th memo to be declassified so they can smear Bush some more but they just report that Clinton's testimoney is not going to be covered "because it is classified"?
9 posted on
04/08/2004 4:39:14 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans.)
To: JeanS
Insert here my one, consistent prayer for the Clintons ...
That the Lord would render the Clintons, and ALL their minions, totally powerless and voiceless and nameless and faceless and useless and homeless and penniless ... that He would strip them bare before the world, such is their evil, and that He would leave only their immortal souls, and it is for these souls I pray.
14 posted on
04/08/2004 4:42:23 PM PDT by
Pegita
('Tis so sweet to trust in Jesus, just to take Him at His Word ...)
To: JeanS
The former president was "forthcoming and responsive," said the commission. translation: lied his ass off!
To: JeanS
Commissioners said Clinton addressed "big-picture" policy issues, including his
administration's response to the October 2000 al-Qaida attack on the
USS Cole. Some commissioners have criticized the Clinton and Bush administrations
for failing to mount a military response to the attack, which killed 17 U.S. sailors.
Too bad the Republicans won't use this as a wedge to make the Democrats look like
a band of lying Inspector Clouseau-s.
In the book "Losing bin Laden", Clarke is portrayed as about the only Clintonista
in favor of a military response.
Any Republican on the committee should be ready to call Richard Clarke back
for a few more questions IN PUBLIC, UNDER OATH.
e.g.,
You and President Clinton had two very different plans for going after bin Laden.
Which one of you was correct?
18 posted on
04/08/2004 4:45:27 PM PDT by
VOA
To: JeanS
Why is this impeached liar entitled to a "private" 911 session, and Dr. Rice was not? The 911 Commission deemed it necessary for Dr. Rice to be grilled twice, no less.
Bill Clinton is the man who pardoned felons and terrorists on his way out of the white house. It was under his watch that the U.S., its citizens, embassies, and allies were under constant attack from 1992-2000. It was specifically under his watch that the INS was so lax that it allowed terrorists to stay in this country on expired visas. It was under his watch that terrorist warnings from Sudan were ignored. It was under his watch that he demanded Isreal release (Oslow? Agreement) one of the terrorists responsible for the 911 attack.
At the very least, the taxpayers deserve to see this man grilled the same way Dr. Rice was today.
21 posted on
04/08/2004 4:51:00 PM PDT by
tomball
To: JeanS
"He was quite honest and frank." How would anyone know? He's an extremely good liar.
To: JeanS
Oh this is good ---- Condi, who is simply a cabinet level advisor is compelled to testify IN PUBLIC (after having already told her bit in closed session), yet the former pervert-in-Chief gets to testify in private?
Gee Wiz....
29 posted on
04/08/2004 5:00:20 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
To: JeanS
No! This isn't right! We want him out there in front of the cameras! He shouldn't testify in behind closed doors! My goodness, what is he hiding? He is afraid to be seen talking about this in front of the American people! Blah, Blah, Blah!!!!!!!! We demand he testify again so CNNNBCMSNBCABC et al can show the world! National Security be damned!!!!!!
/dripping sarcasm
36 posted on
04/08/2004 5:16:59 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Anger the left! Become a MONTHLY DONOR to FreeRepublic.com)
To: JeanS
Some commissioners have criticized the Clinton and Bush administrations for failing to mount a military response to the attack, which killed 17 U.S. sailors. EXCUSE ME? The BUSH Administration?
38 posted on
04/08/2004 5:19:20 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Anger the left! Become a MONTHLY DONOR to FreeRepublic.com)
To: JeanS
No doubt he perjured himself again.
39 posted on
04/08/2004 5:21:43 PM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(3% votes Nader vs 1% purity on the right. Purity is the losing strategy right from the get-go.)
To: JeanS
"....He was adamant about trying to work in a bipartisan way to fix the problems," said Democratic commissioner Timothy Roemer, a former U.S. representative from Indiana. "He was quite honest and frank...."
Bull crap!
bill clinton has never been honest.
Maybe he is considered honest by the perverts and liars in Washington D.C. But I have a different name for him.
41 posted on
04/08/2004 5:24:04 PM PDT by
sport
To: JeanS
"I did not have sex with that country..."
43 posted on
04/08/2004 5:24:30 PM PDT by
meowmeow
To: JeanS
Clinton would LOVE to appear on national TV.
47 posted on
04/08/2004 5:35:27 PM PDT by
arichtaxpayer
(We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson