To: JeanS
Why is this impeached liar entitled to a "private" 911 session, and Dr. Rice was not? The 911 Commission deemed it necessary for Dr. Rice to be grilled twice, no less.
Bill Clinton is the man who pardoned felons and terrorists on his way out of the white house. It was under his watch that the U.S., its citizens, embassies, and allies were under constant attack from 1992-2000. It was specifically under his watch that the INS was so lax that it allowed terrorists to stay in this country on expired visas. It was under his watch that terrorist warnings from Sudan were ignored. It was under his watch that he demanded Isreal release (Oslow? Agreement) one of the terrorists responsible for the 911 attack.
At the very least, the taxpayers deserve to see this man grilled the same way Dr. Rice was today.
21 posted on
04/08/2004 4:51:00 PM PDT by
tomball
To: tomball
Why is this impeached liar entitled to a "private" 911 session, and Dr. Rice was not?Dr. Rice did testify in private for 4 hours, but 5 of the commission members didn't deem that event very important, and didn't show up.
30 posted on
04/08/2004 5:02:39 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: tomball
Why is this impeached liar entitled to a "private" 911 session, and Dr. Rice was not? She is and has done so and will do so again.
The difference is the media and commission played her private discussions as not good enough. Same with the upcoming Bush and Cheney private meeting. Not good enough, says the left.
I have no problem with Clinton meeting privately, but the coverage by the media and the attitude of the commission is completely, hypocritically different.
35 posted on
04/08/2004 5:08:38 PM PDT by
cyncooper
("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
To: tomball
Amen...but don't hold your breath.
51 posted on
04/08/2004 5:56:58 PM PDT by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson