Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TEXT OF DR. CONDOLEEZZA RICE OPENING REMARKS THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS
US Air Force E-mail | 8 Apr 2004 | Condi Rice

Posted on 04/08/2004 7:25:49 AM PDT by commish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
Recieved this a few minutes ago.
1 posted on 04/08/2004 7:25:52 AM PDT by commish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
41 Nevada 105.00
4
26.25
119
0.88
60.00
3

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 04/08/2004 7:29:10 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
bookmrked
3 posted on 04/08/2004 7:29:55 AM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: commish
Bump!
4 posted on 04/08/2004 7:30:50 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish
What an ass hole Ben "Venereal Disease" a Demo-rat - is in his questioning of Dr Rice..........
5 posted on 04/08/2004 7:31:50 AM PDT by ldish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Ok. I'm pissed off about this.

This panel is supposed to be nuetral?

Isn't this supposed to be an investigation?

So why in the hell does the crowd applause after this lady slanders Condi Rice?
6 posted on 04/08/2004 7:32:11 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with high powered explosives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
With a name like Jamie Gorelick no wonder she's a Dem. Shudder!
7 posted on 04/08/2004 7:33:43 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with high powered explosives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: commish
The audience should be gagged! I can't believe they let the audience interrupt the hearing with clapping and other noise. I wish the let an audience sit in on Clinton's grand jury testimony.
8 posted on 04/08/2004 7:34:07 AM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Did anyone of you saw the conference. I didn't have a chance to see it.

Thank you
Bogdan
9 posted on 04/08/2004 7:34:08 AM PDT by bogdanPolska12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I know. Do the Dems also have a Representative named Clintonservicer?
10 posted on 04/08/2004 7:35:43 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
With the way the demo-rats deal on every subject (you know they think they are actually smarter than all of the rest of us) there is never going to be anything bi-partison again in the USA......could well be the beginning of the end for our form of society!
11 posted on 04/08/2004 7:37:15 AM PDT by ldish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Wait until you see how the press plays this circus and then you can really be pissed.
12 posted on 04/08/2004 7:38:12 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
LOL!
13 posted on 04/08/2004 7:38:19 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with high powered explosives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
bttt
14 posted on 04/08/2004 7:39:54 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with high powered explosives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ldish
WOW, hindsight, these pompous pols are so brilliant. What a bunch of jerks, "I am a student of history myself...", give me a break!
15 posted on 04/08/2004 7:40:59 AM PDT by Eire1916
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: commish
I think Condi is doing a great job, but I wish she could be less careful with her words. The general public needs to be reminded more of all that happened under the Clintons' watch. She has mentioned incidents and the years that they occurred, but people need to be reminded of who was in charge during those times.
17 posted on 04/08/2004 7:46:21 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: ConservativeMan55
The applause is from a small chorus of "families of 9/11". We've all seen this before. People who are aggrieved and who manage to focus on the wrong cause/party to take out vengeance upon. The 9/11 attacks had specific victims - but it was an attack on the entire country. These misguided folks are trying to focus blame where it does not belong. It's really quite pathetic. And they're trying to articulate a special role or privilege in the process. I had a former colleague who was killed at the WTC - does that give me special privilege to determine the architecture of the rebuilt WTC or some memorial? No. And the families more direct connection to the crime of 9/11 dose not give them a privileged position to act as a peanut gallery for the Democratic partisans who want to turn the Bush Administration into a punching bag.

And let me say this about Jamie Gorelick who is questioning  Rice as I write. In George Stephanopoulos' book about his time in the White House he wrote about the scene as the verdict in the O.J. Criminal Trial was coming down. President Clinton, Stephanopoulos and Gorelick were at the White House watching it on television. Stephanopoulos point out that Gorelick had in her hands a statement to be read to the press at the White House which was a contingency plan for the event that O.J. had been convicted. It would have indicated that an investigation in Mark Fuhrman was to begin at the Justice Department and was intended to diffuse what the White House was expecting to be a race riot in L.A. over a conviction. How do you like that - they prepare for the political consequences of a conviction, but cannot find the time to direct the justice department to investigate the federal basis for a projection of O.J. on federal conspiracy to commit murder charges. These slimy, ass covering folks wanted to make sure they kept Maxine Waters happy but couldn't lift a finger to do justice. And Gorelick was right there as Deputy AG.

19 posted on 04/08/2004 7:47:57 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
...how much money and resources are being squandered on this democrat PR exhibit..

**
Good one! Can you IM that to Condi?
20 posted on 04/08/2004 7:48:26 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson