Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America no longer white, united, English-speaking
The Miami Herald ^ | 02 April 2004 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 04/03/2004 11:22:26 AM PST by MegaSilver

In 1960, when JFK defeated Nixon, America was a nation of 160 million, 90 percent white and 10 percent black, with a few million Hispanics and Asians sprinkled among us.

We were one nation, one people. We worshipped the same God, spoke the same English language, studied American history and English literature, honored the same heroes, read the same books, watched the same TV shows, went to the same movies and saw ourselves as defenders of Western civilization against the godless communism of the Soviet Empire.

We were confident and proud of who we were. That was yesterday. But due to the Immigration Act of 1965 and the cultural revolution of the '60s, that America is now gone forever. And as one studies the latest projections of the Census Bureau, the America of our grandchildren will be another country altogether, a nation unrecognizable to our parents, a giant Brazil of the North.

In 2050, there will be three times as many people living here as in 1960 -- 420 million. White Americans will be a minority, 49 percent, and falling. Hispanics in the United States, more than 100 million, will be equal to the population of today's Mexico. Our Asian population will be almost as large as our African-American population today.

By countries of origin, America will be a Third World nation. Our cities will look like Los Angeles today. Los Angeles and the cities of Texas, Arizona and California will look like Mexico City.

Writing in Foreign Policy, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington, author of Who We Are, raises an alarm about the huge infusion of Hispanics into the Southwest, and for many reasons.

Much of this mass immigration is illegal. Vast numbers are coming here only to work. They are not assimilating. They do not want to become Americans. They are concentrating in states bordering Mexico, which is their country and a nation with a historic grievance against us. They are holding on to their language and culture, creating a Hispanic nation within our nation. By 2050, there will be scores of millions of people living here whose loyalty is to a foreign country.

Moreover, as multiculturalism has captured our schools and colleges, immigrant children will have prejudices and grievances against America and the West reinforced as they learn. The academic elite that controls these schools already paints America as a nation with a rancid history of genocide, slavery, racism, oppression and imperialism.

Is the Census Bureau future the future that Americans wish? No. Are they willing to risk it for their grandchildren? No.

Why, then, does that future appear inevitable?

Answer: Though a majority of Americans wish to preserve the land they grew up in for their children, our elites -- political, academic, cultural and corporate -- are either unwilling to conserve that America or indifferent to its disappearance.

Most Americans want immigration cut back and all illegal aliens sent back. Why is the will of the majority, expressed in polls and referenda, not reflected in law or policy? Because we no longer live in a democratic republic; we are ruled by a managerial elite.

America's corporate elites want an endless supply of cheap labor. Our judges throw out popularly enacted laws to which they object. Our academic elites work to see ''white, racist America'' disappear. Our neo-Marxist cultural elites wish to be the gravediggers of the West and of Christian culture. And America's conservative party, the Republican Party, believes that Hispanics hold the key to retention of presidential power and is anxious not to offend Mexican President Vicente Fox.

If, by 2050, the America we grew up in has become a Tower of Babel of squabbling minorities that is falling apart, it will be because of the treason of the elites, and our lack of will to overthrow them.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; aztlan; balkanization; breakingnews; buchanan; diversity; immigrantlist; immigration; multiculturalism; patbuchanan; patrickbuchanan; patrickjbuchanan; racistpat; sowhat; whoweare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,021-1,027 next last
To: wardaddy
So, if there are Civs OLDER than Western Europeans civilisation then the Western Europeans couldn't have "civilised" them because these areas were civilised BEFORE Western Europe.
621 posted on 04/04/2004 10:19:17 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Where in your case you stated and implied something current in your reply #399, which have been proved wrong by the US mid term elections of 2002

The fact is that since the article was written prior the 9-11 not after makes it more it more true. As far as your Peron article and its contents, it doesn't matter. Its a matter of protocol. Contact the moderator if you'd like.

Now you've called me a coward and a female in this thread. You're 0 for 2.

BTW, explain why the Dakotas voted heavily for GWB in the 2000 election.

622 posted on 04/04/2004 10:20:04 AM PDT by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The fact still stands that in your reply #399 that you posted a snippet of an article that is not currently topical and was proved wrong by the US midterm elections of 2002

The trend in the article has not been proven wrong by the 2002 election. You know that this election was unique caused by the effects of 9-11.

As 9-11 becomes more of a distant memory to the sheeple, they'll go back to seeing what entitlements they can get out of the government. The new immigrants of today will want these entitlements that were not available to the immigrants of old. To survive, the Republicans will have to move farther to the left.

623 posted on 04/04/2004 10:30:36 AM PDT by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
The fact is that since the article was written prior the 9-11 not after makes it more it more true. As far as your Peron article and its contents, it doesn't matter. Its a matter of protocol. Contact the moderator if you'd like

No reason to call the Moderator, since you are stating that your reply #399 is "makes it more it more true".

No profanity or personal attacks, unless you think making a fool of yourself, IMO, is a concern for the Moderator.

624 posted on 04/04/2004 10:31:13 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
The question is “Why is it considered a good thing to destroy the Language and Culture of the USA?” What gets stronger by breaking it up?

The "State is God" marxists and communists get stronger, that's who. And that describes 90% of college professors who hate America, hate Christians, and hate the principle this country was founded on, liberty.

625 posted on 04/04/2004 10:38:38 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
So, if there are Civs OLDER than Western Europeans civilisation then the Western Europeans couldn't have "civilised" them because these areas were civilised BEFORE Western Europe.

Game, set and match...
626 posted on 04/04/2004 10:48:32 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: Dane
makes it more it more true".

Should be "makes it more true". Glad you agree. Really I don't know if you're making these Free Republic rules up as you go along so why not have the moderator step in to clarify this bone of contention that you have.

627 posted on 04/04/2004 10:55:18 AM PDT by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Dane
And you couldn't do the html.

Man, two way streets must be verboten in your world, IMO.

Give it up! there was another instance when you were provided with an html and were too lazy to click.

Hey, we won't pepper the the forum with "loser, loser" just disappear and get your act together next time.

628 posted on 04/04/2004 10:56:14 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Dane; iconoclast; wardaddy
Poor WD, makes it out that folks have "an axe to grind", when they're mainly refuting some non-factual statements like "Western Europe civilised the entire world".
629 posted on 04/04/2004 10:57:01 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
White is not a race, Caucasian is a race, Mongoloid (to which native Americans belong) is a race.

Your hairsplitting accomplishes almost nothing and gets very tedious very soon.

630 posted on 04/04/2004 11:00:38 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; wardaddy
Poor WD, makes it out that folks have "an axe to grind", when they're mainly refuting some non-factual statements like "Western Europe civilised the entire world"

Pictures of places like Agnkor Kat(sp?) in Cambodia really must give WD the willies to his world view.

631 posted on 04/04/2004 11:00:51 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Affirmative action isn't there for South/West Asians....

They don't need it (as a rule) and you know it, so in my view it is just one more point on the disruptor scoreboard for you.

632 posted on 04/04/2004 11:05:47 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Your hairsplitting accomplishes almost nothing and gets very tedious very soon.

Nope, it's not hairsplitting. Ok, I'll ask you one question -- if white is a race, are Iranis white?
633 posted on 04/04/2004 11:07:17 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Again you refuse to read the post:

BonnyDick's comment was "the decendants of brown-skinned immigrants, raised in the US for generations, won't be able to run the country" They still need AA to get into good schools.

To which I replied
Affirmative action isn't there for South/West Asians....

To which YOU reply :

They don't need it (as a rule) and you know it, so in my view it is just one more point on the disruptor scoreboard for you.

So, don't you get it? you're agreeing with me that BD is wrong when he says that they need AA when they don't.
634 posted on 04/04/2004 11:09:44 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Dane
I'm not payin that much attention but isn't this the first time you two have gotten together?

Beautiful, a perfect disruptor and a perfect idiot. Go in peace my children.

635 posted on 04/04/2004 11:13:06 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Same thing, my friend, they wanted to be LEFT alone, I know exactly why the Chinese built the wall, it was to preserve and protect their Chineseness, which they apparently kind of liked. They closed their culture to the outside world for hundreds of years, so did Japan. Did you miss that memo? Do you have another laughable spin on that? You avoid the point, on purpose, you aim at little stuff and ignore the question. Which is can White westerners discuss the long term effects of immigration on society without the hooded, racist taliban, swooping down and hurling the R word around. It is not racist to discuss or be concerned about preserving one's culture. As history, and modern times, clearly shows, all peoples do it, those among us that want to prevent that discussion from taking place among ONE group of people only, western whites, are the real racists among us.
636 posted on 04/04/2004 11:16:19 AM PDT by ronnieb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
I'm not payin that much attention but isn't this the first time you two have gotten together?

Beautiful, a perfect disruptor and a perfect idiot. Go in peace my children

Peace to all you also icon, but IMO you won't find it by following Pat Buchanan fatalist rhetoric.

Again JMO, you will only find bitterness, which you seem to have a penchant of wallowing in.

637 posted on 04/04/2004 11:21:02 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
How very amusing! Have you considered going on tour?

I have a golfing buddy that has been in every off-the-wall nation in the world. I asked him ... "what's the absolutely worst sh!t hole you've been in?

Not terribly surprising he answered, "India,... and nobody else is close!"

638 posted on 04/04/2004 11:22:14 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: ronnieb
bump
639 posted on 04/04/2004 11:22:58 AM PDT by junta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Both also have large numbers of Christians (Israel approx 2.1% vix. 120,000, India 3% approx 30 MILLION).

And your idea of SMALL numbers would be?

640 posted on 04/04/2004 11:28:05 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,021-1,027 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson