Skip to comments.
Abortionists Admit Dismemberment Horror
NewsMax ^
| April 1, 2004
Posted on 04/01/2004 10:57:25 AM PST by Cedar
Abortionists Admit Dismemberment Horror
"Another doctor a day earlier had testified that a fetus sometimes does not immediately die after limbs are pulled off."
That's the sole reference we could find to the major piece of blockbuster testimony in searching the wire services today for accounts of the partial-birth abortion trial going on in New York.
Pro-abortion reporters and editors don't like to dwell on reality, doncha know.
Here's some slightly less horrific testimony that the media will relate from U.S. District Court in Manhattan.
"Does the fetus feel pain?" Judge Richard C. Casey on Wednesday asked another abortionist, Dr. Timothy Johnson, a plaintiff in one of three lawsuits challenging the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.
Johnson: "I guess whenever I ..."
Judge Casey: "Simple question, doctor. Does it cross your mind?"
The abortionist said it did not.
Judge Casey: "Never crossed your mind?"
Johnson: "No."
Judge Casey: "So you tell her the arms and legs are pulled off? I mean, that's what I want to know. Do you tell her?"
Johnson: "We tell her the baby, the fetus, is dismembered as part of the procedure, yes."
Casey asked if abortionists admitted to the mother about "sucking the brain out of the skull" of the baby.
Some Settling of Contents May Occur
Johnson: "I don't think we would use those terms. I think we would probably use a term like 'decompression of the skull' or 'reducing the contents of the skull.'"
Judge Casey: "Make it nice and palatable so that they wouldn't understand what it's all about?"
Johnson: "We try to do it in a way that's not offensive or gruesome or overly graphic for patients."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortedbabies; abortedfetuses; abortion; abortionists; civilrights; cultureofdeath; dismemberedbodies; fetalpain; fetaltissue; fetus; fetuses; humanrights; infanticide; murder; pba; righttobeararms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
How can this nation allow abortions to continue? Are people without any heart? There should be nation-wide protests of millions across the U.S. demanding it be stopped. How come only a few hundred ever show up?
1
posted on
04/01/2004 10:57:27 AM PST
by
Cedar
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: ron847
Some would prefer a quick death over years of emotional misery and/or abuse.You're a moron.
3
posted on
04/01/2004 11:06:24 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: ron847
I can't ever support murder of a baby.
4
posted on
04/01/2004 11:07:26 AM PST
by
Cedar
To: Cedar
To: Cedar
So, what is all this protest about abortion?
Maybe life begins with the SEX ACT???
Funny how no one protests about THAT, when it occurs under inappropriate circumstances,,,
I guess it's the:
"Right to have sex without being prepared for the expected result, huh?"
It is NOT abortion that is the problem, it is careless SEXXX, plain and simple.
To: Cedar
"We try to do it in a way that's not offensive or gruesome or overly graphic for patients."How very sympathetic of them.
7
posted on
04/01/2004 11:11:50 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Cedar
Wow, a judge who gets it.
9
posted on
04/01/2004 11:11:55 AM PST
by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: ron847
And what kind of childhood would her child have? Don't you think the child should have the right to choose?
10
posted on
04/01/2004 11:12:16 AM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Cedar
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Blood of Tyrants
My thoughts exactly!!
13
posted on
04/01/2004 11:14:08 AM PST
by
Polyxene
(Never hold discussions with the monkey when the organ grinder is in the room.- Sir Winston Churchill)
To: Cedar
Do this to a kitten and there would be hell to pay. Modern society makes me want to cry.
14
posted on
04/01/2004 11:15:18 AM PST
by
GingisK
To: ron847
You're even stupider than I though you were. You don't kill unborn babies to save them from might be's, could have beens and possible molestation by pedophile priests moron.
15
posted on
04/01/2004 11:15:29 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: Cedar
Johnson: "We try to do it in a way that's not offensive or gruesome or overly graphic for patients." Someone tell me what is not "offensive, gruesome or overly graphic" about an abortion! What a sicko. I often wonder how doctors who perform abortions can live with themselves. Do they hear the screams of dying children in their dreams? I hope so.
17
posted on
04/01/2004 11:17:44 AM PST
by
Gerish
(Do not be fearful. God is with you.)
To: ron847
A "woman's right to choose" has become a standard option of birth control, after the fact. Why should a woman worry about getting pregnant if she can change her mind mid-stream? If it wasn't an option, do you think these women who don't want to be mothers might do something about not getting pregnant in the first place - do they know what the steps are to create a pregnancy - surely they know what the steps are to terminate it. It's become such a travesty to have life created and then litterally sucked away because someone's mind has changed.
18
posted on
04/01/2004 11:18:37 AM PST
by
momfirst
To: ron847
don't confuse support of a woman's right to choose with wanton encouragement of abortion. "A woman's right to choose" is usually synonymous with "protecting a women's reproductive rights."
I'm all in favor of protecting reproductive rights, and a woman's right to choose....whether she will conceive. But once she's conceived, the issue is no longer her "reproductive rights." She's pregnant, and that means she's carrying a new human life. That life should be protected.
The US Dept. of Health and Human Services had requested of a San Francisco hospital information on the partial-birth abortions done at the hosptial (I suspect because the hospital is likely a PBA mill). The hospital refused, citing "patient privacy," and that's apparently the basis of one of the court challenges to the PBA law. I really hope that what the court comes down with is a decision that decides for the protection of the unborn, over the privacy rights of either the hospital or the patient. This would be a poison pill which would eventually shatter the whole basis of Roe v. Wade.
19
posted on
04/01/2004 11:18:43 AM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: ron847
Did anyone bother to ask the baby? You are an absolute idiot.
20
posted on
04/01/2004 11:19:34 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson