Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hardball Tonight: Clarke - 9/11 Might Have Been Prevented
MSNBC ^ | Updated: 3:35 p.m. ET March 31, 2004 | Alex Johnson

Posted on 03/31/2004 1:03:36 PM PST by ironman

NEW YORK - Richard Clarke, President Bush’s former chief counterterrorism adviser, said Wednesday that it was possible that he and his team could have prevented the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks if the Bush administration had paid more attention ahead of time to Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida terror network.

Clarke’s comments, in an hourlong interview on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” were a departure from the testimony he gave last week before the independent commission investigating the attacks, when he answered no to the question of whether there was “the remotest chance that it would have prevented 9/11” even if everything he had called for had been implemented.

But Clarke told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that he hoped he and his team would have been able to take action to quash the attacks, which killed about 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania, had the CIA and the FBI sufficiently coordinated the bits and pieces of information they had about the 19 Saudis who hijacked four planes and crashed them in the worst attack on U.S. soil.

Acknowledging that he was indulging in “20/20 hindsight,” Clarke said it was likely that he could have made a difference had he known that some of the hijackers were in the country ahead of time and had drawn suspicion. The full interview is scheduled to air today at 7 p.m. ET on MSNBC-TV.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushknew; richardclarke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-496 next last
To: ironman
Acknowledging that he was indulging in “20/20 hindsight,” Clarke said

Clarke, read my tagline.
21 posted on 03/31/2004 1:17:57 PM PST by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Last night on LKL, Bob Scheiffer from CBS blamed Monica Lewinsky!
22 posted on 03/31/2004 1:18:54 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
No, wait the book fits in with the second 9-11 testimony Clarke gave the to the 9-11 commission, no wait, it fits with the first testimony he gave the second commission, no wait, the briefing, no the emails, no wait, the 60 Minutes interview, oh, wait that goes over here... and voila:


23 posted on 03/31/2004 1:19:03 PM PST by eyespysomething (To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first, and call whatever you hit the target)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
This isn't really a change. He admitted that even if all the policy changes he wanted were made, it would have made no difference with respect to 9-11. That's because all his suggestions were aimed at aiding the Northen Alliance, sending special ops into Afghanastan, etc.

What he's saying now is that if every bit of intelligence that can be peiced together nicely with 20/20 hindsight was presented to him prior to 9-11, he could have put it together because he is a master at solving puzzles. Here's a picture of him in the situation room solving riddles


24 posted on 03/31/2004 1:19:44 PM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ironman
Wow... Dick Clarke for 60 minutes with Chris Matthews... Sounds like a Lewinsky to me.
25 posted on 03/31/2004 1:19:50 PM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
ROFLMAO! I have another one of those, but it's unpostable on FR!
26 posted on 03/31/2004 1:20:16 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Clarke did tape his Hardball appearance.

I wonder if Chrissy "put the screws to him" as Thompson instructed. Something tells me "no".

lol
27 posted on 03/31/2004 1:20:45 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman
This @sshole has a "superman" complex. He needs help.
28 posted on 03/31/2004 1:21:07 PM PST by Danette (Bush 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman
This @sshole has a "superman" complex. He needs help.
29 posted on 03/31/2004 1:21:21 PM PST by Danette (Bush 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman
This nutter is having delusions of Bond - now he seems to think he's a double-o agent.
30 posted on 03/31/2004 1:22:22 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman
A copy of an email I sent to Hardball:

As a retired Foreign Service Officer, I was angered by Clarke's comments during the hearing that only 35 Americans lost their lives to al-Qaeda during the Clinton administration compared to the number lost during Bush's tenure. There were 36 US employees (American and local) killed in Kenya alone. Clarke and Clinton need to answer for their feckless reaction to the 1998 East Africa Embassy bombings, which injured and killed thousands. Clarke's assertion that the Clinton administration placed a higher priority on fighting terrorism is belied by their reaction to the attacks on our embassies.

According to official Kenyan government figures, 213 people were killed in the blast that gutted the U.S. Embassy building in downtown Nairobi. That included 12 American workers and 34 of their Kenyan colleagues, called "foreign service nationals [FSNs]." More than 4,000 Kenyans were also injured in the explosion.

According to Tanzanian government figures, 12 people, all Tanzanians, died as a result of the truck bomb that exploded in the street outside the U.S. Embassy in Dar es Salaam. Seventy-two Americans and Tanzanians were also injured in the terrorist attack.

The bombings in East Africa should have been the real 9/11 wake-up call for the American public. It was a failure of leadership (read Clinton/Clarke) that did not rally our country to go to war against al-Qaeda. The number of total casualties, wounded and dead, in the East Africa bombings against our embassies approximated those suffered on 9/11. In addition to the bombings, bin Laden had issued a fatwah in 1998 declaring war against the United States. Clarke/Clinton's response was to blow up an aspirin factory in the Sudan and launch some missiles at terrorist camps in Afghanistan.

The bottom line is that the Clinton administration failed to recognize we were at war and took the less controversial stance of treating terrorism as an ad hoc, law enforcement matter. There was a thread that ran through all of these attacks, and attempted attacks and that was al-Qaeda.

When our vital national interests are at stake, I want a President who will take action regardless of how it may affect the polls or our international standing or the personal consequences. One of the functions of leadership is to lead and build a national consensus. Clinton saw foreign policy as an extension of domestic politics and acted accordingly. We are reaping the whirlwind due to Clinton's failures.

31 posted on 03/31/2004 1:23:39 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish
At that point it will be time to tie Richard Clarke around Kerry's neck like an albatross.

Seems like Clarke and F'ing Kerry have a common problem:

FLIP FLOP!

32 posted on 03/31/2004 1:24:09 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Give liberals a rope, and they will hang themselves with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
This is analogous to questioning what the definition of "is" is.
33 posted on 03/31/2004 1:24:34 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Last night on LKL, Bob Scheiffer from CBS blamed Monica Lewinsky!

He's just jealous because she pushed Sheiffer out of the way right after he got himself a new shiny beret to wear.

34 posted on 03/31/2004 1:24:42 PM PST by Dahoser (They RATS are waging war on many fronts. That's the big picture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
And half the people who watch are probably conservative masochists like me who watch just to be annoyed.
35 posted on 03/31/2004 1:24:54 PM PST by Huck (In the Soviet Union, the Admin Moderators ruled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm starting to think this guy is certifiably insane. No stable person could publicly contradict himself so much and so frequently. I think there is an actual mental problem here.

Maybe we will eventually see the little guys in the white coats escorting Dickie-Poo away, mumbling incoherently and talking back to those "voices".

36 posted on 03/31/2004 1:25:15 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
What he's saying now is that if every bit of intelligence that can be peiced together nicely with 20/20 hindsight was presented to him prior to 9-11, he could have put it together...

Well, if we here at FR had known all that, I suspect WE could have "put it together," too.

37 posted on 03/31/2004 1:25:28 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ironman
"Clarke’s comments, in an hourlong interview on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” were a departure from the testimony he gave last week before the independent commission investigating the attacks, when he answered no to the question of whether there was “the remotest chance that it would have prevented 9/11” even if everything he had called for had been implemented."

This guy is sure all over the map! As Post #2 says, how is it he can stay straight within a week's time, but he has perfect recall of 9/11? (And I would add to that, all the stories about the book are that he paints himself as the Hero in Charge on 9/11, ordering planes shot down, ordering the President to stay out of D.C. ...)

38 posted on 03/31/2004 1:25:40 PM PST by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How come every time I read about Clarke he's talking about the lack of meetings? In my world those that excessively meet persistently fail to make any difference as leaders.
39 posted on 03/31/2004 1:26:07 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I know! We're shameless!
40 posted on 03/31/2004 1:26:07 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-496 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson