Monsoor Ijaz to testify before 9/11 commission

Fox News Channel ^ | 3/28/04 | me

[alnick]

Please forgive the vanity, but I've done a search and cannot find any reference to this.

I saw Monsoor Ijaz on FNC an hour or so ago, and he said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

If this has been posted elsewhere, I'll ask the mod to take this down.

[Khurkris]

"OH WOWW RACK ITTT NUT I want see Mossiz Iziz rack ittt"

...can we get a translator on aisle #190 please?

[YoSoy2]

"Well of course they're bipartisan, there's members of both parties on the commision."

That's exactly what I meant - nothing more nothing less. Apparently some have problems understanding declarative statements.

[sdk7x7]

Funny how Clarke's pre-testimony news was all over the place and yet we can't even find one source about Monsoor.

[Saints fan]

"OH WOWW RACK ITTT NUT I want see Mossiz Iziz rack ittt"

...can we get a translator on aisle #190 please?

sounds like one of those snoop doggy fellers!

[YoSoy2]

"Welcome to FreeRepublic, YoSoy2! The 9-11 Commission hearings are supposedly bipartisan, yes. However, here's a little background for you: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1015502/posts"

Thanks for the welcome, arasina.

And right you are about the hearings being slanted for the dims. But the hearings procedures, etc were set up by both demcrats and republicans. That's what I meant before about their being bipartsan.

Thank you for your politeness and the gentlemanly manner with wich you answered my post. I'll check on the link you provided.

[Joy Angela]

How about an Investigative Commission
into WHY Bill Clinton Pardoned TERRORISTS!

-- Bill & Hillary's "Living History" --

What does 9-11 mean to the Clintons??

**September 11,1998**

House of Representatives releases some 445 pages of the Starr report. Millions of people read the report on the internet.

and then....

**September 11 1999**

reports:
CONVICTED TERRORISTS set FREE By BILL CLINTON http://www.freep.com/news/nw/qfree11.htm

(many felt that the release of the Puerto Rico Terrorists was a bid to win support for Hillary in New York from the Puerto Rico community)

**September 11, 2000**

Hillary was to be honored in New York..protests are planned.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39afbfb003fe.htm

NEW YORK (August 30) - In a move that critics say smacks of partisan politics, the World Jewish Congress will honor Hillary Clinton next month at a black-tie fund-raising dinner here. The event is scheduled for September 11, less than two months before voters go to the polls to decide whether she or her Republican challenger, Rep. Rick Lazio, should represent New York in the US Senate.

**
While on the Senate Floor, warnings of danger prophecy the coming terror to come...

Date: September 2000

Mr. CRAIG.

Mr. President, I came to the floor to talk about a significant date in this Nation's fight against terrorism. This week marks the Clinton-Gore administration's decision to jeopardize American lives by surrendering to one of the most violent terrorist groups ever to operate on this country's soil.

One year ago this week, President Clinton opened the jailhouse doors for 11 members of a terrorist group known as the FALN, which is dedicated to the violent pursuit of Puerto Rican independence. The FALN has claimed responsibility for some 130 bombings at civilian, political, and military sites in the United States. In all, the group murdered six Americans and maimed, often permanently, 84 others, including law enforcement officers.

On one occasion, members attacked a Navy bus in Puerto Rico killing two sailors and wounding nine others. As a result, 16 members of this violent terrorist group were convicted of dozens of felonies against the United States, and as soon as these 16 were in prison, the bombings stopped. .....


***September 11, 2001***

Terrorists attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

What *is* It
about the Clintons & September 11...

A bit of REVENGE for the Starr Report?

Never Forget Hillary Clinton's MAIN FOE, Barbara Olson, author and media darling, was KILLED on 9-11 when her plane crashed into the Pentagon.

[Saints fan]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/685097/posts

check this out

[lainde]

I can't wait. He's got the goods on the Osama refusal!

[montag813]

I saw Monsoor Ijaz on FNC an hour or so ago, and he said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

Bob Kerrey and the Viacom-DNC-Socialist 9/11 Families Axis will never permit it.

[OXENinFLA]

Seen this?

Not till this morning, good news.

When will he go infront of the commission?

[mewzilla]

Wow. This was news to me. Did he say when the request was made for him to appear? Bet it was only very recently....

[mewzilla]

Wonder if they'll hold Ijaz's testimony behind closed doors? Is Ijaz prohibitted from discussing his testimony after he gives it? If not, I hope he takes notes, comes on FNC right afterwards and spews.

[StriperSniper]

When will he go infront of the commission?

I don't there has been a date set.

[Republic]

What I don't understand is why a separate entity isn't investigating our intelligence pre- 9/11.

I mean, seems to me the members of congress, BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, are as responsible for the terrorist build up leading to 9/11 due to lack of action during the klinton reign of terror as administration officials are...they have the responsibility for OVERSIGHT and access to the same information (the Committee on Intelligence oversight). How do these men and women get to duck under the covers and point fingers thru the holes in the fabric at others?

They are our closet link to our government, our elected officials, and hold immense responsibility.

They are as responsible for allowing klinton the panty hawk to destroy our intelligence community as anyone. Their votes allowed it to happen.

Why aren't THEY on the hot seat?

[lakewriter]

Forgive me if this was mentioned earlier. Bit short of time now but plan to revisit this tonight. I was thrilled to learn Ijaz was going before the Commission. I saw him on Fox shortly after Clarke testimony - Ijaz was LIVID. He challenged Clarke to an open debate, anywhere/anytime. I'd never seen Ijaz so hot under the collar - he's usually cool as a cucumber. Ijaz is no dummy - he'll blow Clarke out of the water. I can only hope his testimony will be public. Yeah - you go, Ijaz!! Rock that boat!

[StriperSniper]

on Fox shortly after Clarke testimony - Ijaz was LIVID.

I only saw a bit of that on tape. He would have been beet red if it wasn't for his complexion, he was steamed! :)

[Nita Nupress]

Yes. See 186 by Dolphy.

[Unicorn]

You got that right.

[mewzilla]

Darn good question. Who's going to investigate Congress? I won't hold my breath.

[mathluv]

Will this be on TV like the 2 days last week? If so, when?