Monsoor Ijaz to testify before 9/11 commission

Fox News Channel ^ | 3/28/04 | me

[alnick]

Please forgive the vanity, but I've done a search and cannot find any reference to this.

I saw Monsoor Ijaz on FNC an hour or so ago, and he said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

If this has been posted elsewhere, I'll ask the mod to take this down.

[prairiebreeze]

Thanks for the ping.

I vote circus instead of zoo....but either applies really. (tagline)

Prairie

[RoseofTexas]

Pleaaaaaaaaaaaaseeee folks, don't get your hopes up high. TOOOOO many times our hopes have been dashed! Monsoor can testify all he wants, the media whores will never give him the exposure they gave Smeagol Clarke! In other words, he'll be black out by the lib whores! The truth will be swept under the rug! Smeagol's smear against W has worked brilliantly, unfortunately! :(

[nutmeg]

Per Fox News earlier today... Monsoor Ijaz said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[nutmeg]

FoxFan ping!

Per Fox News earlier today... Monsoor Ijaz said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

[nutmeg]

Per Fox News earlier today... Monsoor Ijaz said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

[lonevoice]

bookmark for later

[rwfromkansas]

Another woman involved with the Sudan situation testified privately to the commission in October.

However, she told me that the commission asked questions that basically kept her from telling what she knew and tried to get her to talk about high level administration stuff she did not know.

I wonder if they will do the same with Ijaz so he can't speak about what he did trying to turn OBL over.

[Endeavor]

Richard Miniter in his book, "Losing Bin Laden" tells about a woman named Janet McElligott who worked as a lobbyist for the Sudan during some of the Clinton years and she tells a story about the Sudan using her to try and communicate with a CIA operative to turn Bin Laden over to us. She would be able to tell her story - I heard someone alleging to be her called Hannity late last week and tried to tell the story. I don't get Hannity so I didn't hear it, but it was reported here that the woman had called him on air. Janet would be a good person for the commission to talk with. I have been surprised that the RNC or some of the news agencies haven't dug her up. Of course, most of the news agencies would not welcome her testimony.

[Paulie]

Shall we dub Monsoor Ijaz as "The Equalizer"?

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.


September 12, 2001

MONSOOR IJAZ told America on National TV that the CLINTON White House had refused 3 Free Offers he brokered with the Sudan during the 1990's to gives us OSAMA bin LADEN on a Silver Platter that would have stopped the Attacks on America the previous day.



Early June 2003

MAHDI IBRAHIM MOHAMED confirmed to me personally what MONSOOR IJAZ had told America about these 3 OSAMA Offers being refused by the CLINTON White House. MAHDI worked with MONSOOR in these Offers negotiations on behalf of the President of the Sudan. MAHDI was the Sudan Ambassador to the United States during the 1990's.


Mid-June 2003

DICK MORRIS, the CLINTON White House Political Advisor during the 1990's, personally confirmed to me twice on the Judicial Watch Report Radio Show that BILL CLINTON did refused at least 2 OSAMA Offers during the 1990's. I have been doing this online and in my Calls into Talk Radio/TV as well.


I have been calling for MONSOOR IJAZ to be called before a 911 Investigating Commission to testify about all this ever since the Week of September 11, 2001.


MONSOOR IJAZ =

The Most Feared Man in America...
by DEMOCRATS...
for very good reason.


To sign our U.S. 7th Cavalry's Petition for President BUSH to award our Brother RICK RESCORLA the Presidential Medal of Freedom ...for RICK's getting almost everyone else out of Tower 2 on Sept. 11th before it came crashing on him please see:


http://www.lzxray.com



Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer / Vet-U.S. 7th Cavalry's Battle of IA DRANG-1965

http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_collection.htm
(IA DRANG-1965 Photos)




NEVER FORGET

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.



Please see my Post #150


.

[Mo1]

Will this be an open hearing ... or a behind close doors?

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.


Please see my Post #150


.

[Nita Nupress]

The Washington Times
December 08, 2001

PART A; COMMENTARY; EDITORIALS; Pg. A11

Shame on Clinton - again

Good news, sort of, for Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright. Having persisted in telling tales at cross-purposes to explain why the Clinton administration did nothing about Osama bin Laden and the al Qaeda network for all those Clinton years, these two erstwhile office-holders may now read from the same page - literally - and discover in the January issue of Vanity Fair what went wrong on their watch.

In "The Osama Files" by David Rose, the former president and former secretary of state get a second chance to see the letters and secret memoranda that they, along with their top aides, once ignored or failed to act upon. The rest of us, meanwhile, get a look at an eye-popping paper trail that documents futile efforts by Sudan to alert the United States to the workings, the identities and the movements of the al Qaeda network, including, of course, bin Laden.

Mr. Clinton and Mrs. Albright may not only reconsider the entreaties of Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir to then-President Clinton (the Sudanese leader asked to open his country to the CIA and the FBI so the United States could investigate for itself whether Sudan trained or sheltered terrorists), but also the many invitations Sudan made to share terrorism information with U.S. intelligence agencies. In political retirement, they may reflect on whether it was such a brilliant idea, for example, for the State Department to have nixed FBI interest in meeting with Sudanese intelligence. As former Bush White House official and lobbyist Janet McElligott said when urging the government to examine Sudan's dossiers, "You do realize bin Laden lived there Sudan and they have files on his main people?"

Vanity Fair reports that Sudan's efforts to open its books on bin Laden began in February 1996, well in advance of the terrorist attacks that would make the Saudi-born terrorist infamous. That means that for more than four years the Clinton administration refused to consider intelligence that might have prevented the bombing of the Khobar Towers (June 1996), the destruction of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania (August 1998), the attack on the USS Cole (October 2000) and, of course, September 11. Why was such potentially vital information not only ignored but never even evaluated?

"The simple answer is that the Clinton administration had accused Sudan of sponsoring terrorism, and refused to believe that anything it did to prove its bona fides could be genuine," the magazine reports. No doubt. But there is probably more to this scandalous failure than the "politicization" of intelligence.

Just ask a simple question. What mattered more to Clintonites in June 1996: the news on June 25 that a truck bomb had exploded at Khobar Towers in Dharan, Saudi Arabia, or the Supreme Court decision on June 24 to hear Jones vs. Clinton after the 1996 re-election campaign? Or compare another strange confluence of events. What more likely preoccupied Mr. Clinton and his advisers in August 1998: the embassy bombings in Africa on Aug. 7, or Mr. Clinton's upcoming appearance before a grand jury in connection with the Lewinsky matter on Aug. 17?

Given the permanent reconfiguration of the Clinton White House into a scandal-busting spin machine, the answers to such questions are obvious and distasteful. They may make it easier to explain, for example, why Sudan's offer to extradite two suspected bombers and al Qaeda members, made in the days between the embassy bombings and Mr. Clinton's grand jury appearance, was met with silence - except, of course, for the sound of American bombs falling on a Khartoum medicine factory. They don't, however, make it any more conscionable.

The fact is, the scandal-riddled Clinton administration simply and disastrously failed to function - and that, surely, is the biggest scandal of them all.

[LayoutGuru2]

BUMP!

[Nita Nupress]

Will see if anything more definitive comes up.

WALL STREET JOURNAL
March 11, 1997, Tuesday
Section A; Page 22, Column 3

A DANGEROUS FOREIGN-POLICY VACUUM
BY MANSOOR IJAZ

ABSTRACT:

Commentary by Mansoor Ijaz sees vacuum in US foreign policy toward key states in Islamic world: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, the Caspian region and the Sudan; suggests policy of engagement rather than containment; map (M)

[nopardons]

I agree with you 100%! And Ijaz can't wait to get in there and correct the liar Clarke.That's drive the final nail into the liar's coffin. :-)

[txhurl]

Clarke was an arrogant fool to think that he could stab the president in the back this way and get away with it.

There's a school of thought that holds that the playing of Clarke was a checkmate of the highest order.

Let the Rats suck on that for a while.

[Eva]

Please explain.

[Joy Angela]

apparently "bush is a fascist" is one of the few topics that have been approved by big brother. they're getting banned in droves, and flocking over to people for change, where the number on topic seems to be what a snithole DU has become.

I read in today's newspaper that Moscow has ruled that Jehovah Witnesses are an "illegal" group because they disrupt families (imagine that!) and are guilty of "hate crimes."

(It's not a good thing to hate your dictators and teach other's to rebel, can't wait for this to happen here under Heil Hitlery.)

There you have it. The Leftist-Commies throw out a few choice words, and freedom is forever gone.

Just like with our own Leftists! They throw around nasty sounding names and slogans, but really the argument is null and empty but when "they" are in power, everyone else loses theirs!