Posted on 03/27/2004 2:15:23 PM PST by Lando Lincoln
From the reaction to the Israeli assassination of Hamas Spiritual Leader, Sheik Yasin, in some quarters youd have thought that the Israelis had entered and defiled the Church of the Nativity. No, wait, it was the Palestinians who did that. Well, forget about that then. The primary reaction from European and Western sources was to exclaim their hatred for Yasins role in the mass-murder of innocent Israelis, but an equal concern for the fate of the so-called peace process. Frankly, I can barely speak the word without spitting it out. As Patrick Henry said, Peace? But there is no peace. The war is actually begun.
The only regret I have about Israels actions against Sheik Yasin is that they didnt bomb his funeral procession. Anyone showing up to pay their respects to that man deserved to die. Such an action would have brought about a very great reduction in the terrorist population of the territories.
Its time that we all face facts: there will never be peace in Israel so long as the Palestinians remain determined to wipe Israel from the map. Anyone who believes for a single second that the creation of a Palestinian microstate in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza would alleviate the problem is deluding themselves. At Camp David four years ago, Ehud Barak offered Arafat everything that the Palestinians could ever hope to get from Israel and then some. Arafat turned him down without making so much as a counter-offer and, as frightening as it sounds, whoever finally follows Arafat is likely to be much less of a moderate than he. Make no mistake: this is a fight to the death. It will be over only when one side destroys the other altogether.
So what is Israel to do? Should we expect it to meekly submit to its own destruction? Do we honestly think that, if we were in the same position, we would tolerate the random murder of civilians on a regular basis? Understand this: as a percentage of the population, every Israeli Jew lost is roughly the same as sixty Americans. I do not mean this in the sense of worth; I mean that in terms of how each loss is felt across the nation as a whole. Imagine if Chicago lost a dozen people in a suicide bombing about every other week. As a percentage of the population, Israels thousand dead is the rough equivalent of 60,000 dead. If there were 60,000 Americans killed, at random, across the country how many do you think you would have known? As percentage of the population, Israels seven thousand casualties would be the equivalent of 420,000. Do you think you would have known any of them? Or been any of them?
Israel is in a war. To expect them to simply make peace with those who have murdered scores of their people at random is an absurdity. There can be no peace with killers and savages.
In the long term, there is only a single plausible solution: the transfer of the Palestinian and potentially disloyal Israeli Arab populations. Absent this, it is inevitable that Israel will be destroyed by either military force or demographic trends. As Benny Morris, the foremost chronicler of the original displacement of the Arab population of Israel has explained, the ultimate survival of Israel depends upon the coercive relocation of the Moslems located within Israels borders.
Now, naturally, this will not be possible absent a major crisis. The outrage of the international community, were Israel to undertake such a policy as a bolt from the blue, would be such that it could conceivably even bring some sort of international action against Israel. Such a policy could only be implemented in the immediate aftermath of a major atrocity against the Israeli people.
So what, then, is the solution? First of all, provisions and plans must be made for the displacement of the Palestinians under emergency conditions. After all, without such plans, the aftermath of a nuclear attack would probably feature only limited attacks by localized groups against the Palestinians, versus a concerted effort to assure Israels long-term security.
In the interim, the Israeli Government must walk a fine line. It cannot lose international support, but it also cannot allow the development of a Palestinian state which would receive international recognition. Second, it must protect its own citizens from terrorist attacks. To me, this calls for a policy of building (and strengthening) the defensive wall around Israel, which will keep out individual suicide bombers, and for stonewalling on any negotiations (or, better yet, engaging in and then disrupting them ad naseum).
The solution called for is more death for Palestinian terrorists, their supporters, and their sympathizers.
Stop trying to cheer us up.
Near as I can tell, "palestinians" ALL support the terrorists. The only feasible solution is to move the "palestinians" to some part of the muslim world at least 500 miles from Israel.
You're right, of course. But I think the most illuminating analogy I've seen is one suggested by a Freeper: Israel is comparable in size and population to New Jersey; picture NJ suffering the attacks Israel has.
From the article ...
The only regret I have about Israels actions against Sheik Yasin is that they didnt bomb his funeral procession. Anyone showing up to pay their respects to that man deserved to die. Such an action would have brought about a very great reduction in the terrorist population of the territories.Its time that we all face facts: there will never be peace in Israel so long as the Palestinians remain determined to wipe Israel from the map. Anyone who believes for a single second that the creation of a Palestinian microstate in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza would alleviate the problem is deluding themselves. At Camp David four years ago, Ehud Barak offered Arafat everything that the Palestinians could ever hope to get from Israel and then some. Arafat turned him down without making so much as a counter-offer and, as frightening as it sounds, whoever finally follows Arafat is likely to be much less of a moderate than he. Make no mistake: this is a fight to the death. It will be over only when one side destroys the other altogether.
I taught Jean Keri the
'pull my finger' move ...
We'd sooner let terrorists continue to strike us at home than do what you suggested, which is of course the only effective means to end terrorism and establish real homeland security. Sucks, but there it is.
The only regret I have about Israels actions against Sheik Yasin is that they didnt bomb his funeral procession. Anyone showing up to pay their respects to that man deserved to die. Such an action would have brought about a very great reduction in the terrorist population of the territories.
Its time that we all face facts: there will never be peace in Israel so long as the Palestinians remain determined to wipe Israel from the map. Anyone who believes for a single second that the creation of a Palestinian microstate in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza would alleviate the problem is deluding themselves.
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.