Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Party has ignored its principles
The Greenville News ^ | March 26, 2004 | Robert G. Butch Taylor (letter to the editor)

Posted on 03/26/2004 12:06:46 PM PST by Willie Green

Edited on 05/07/2004 9:06:02 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In a recent letter to the president of the United States, I informed him of my resignation from the Republican Party in Greenville. I shall continue to be involved in the local political arena, but not as a Republican.

I am sick and tired of the Republicans selling us down the river. No matter how hard I try to institute positive change, Republicans and the Republican Party ignore my pleas. For this reason I have joined the U.S. Constitution Party and urge other conservatives to do the same.


(Excerpt) Read more at greenvilleonline.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: cafta; doom; ftaa; globalism; gloom; nafta; thebusheconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-350 next last
To: Luis Gonzalez
Oh now I see. Yes, that does draw direct parallels in this peaceful, tranquil world. With Free Trade every nation will work towards the collective best interests of All Nations and All Peoples. Wars as we can clearly see from current events are a thing of the distant past.

China, in particular, in the 3 years subsequent to their threatening to Nuke us, has seen the light and are taking down those towering trade barriers to our products as we speak. I'm not even worried about their legion of industrial spies in the U.S. or their wont to pirate anything they can get their hands on. Isn't that so silly for them to do that? And I'm sure the vast resources they are plunging into their military is really just a sign of Goodwill towards all men.

161 posted on 03/26/2004 6:36:33 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Glad to see that you are learning American history. It took you over 2 hours to finally admit that Nixon was not impeached.
162 posted on 03/26/2004 6:52:40 PM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Amnesty.

A sovereign act of forgiveness for past acts, granted by a government to all persons (or to certain classes of persons) who have been guilty of crime or delict, generally political offenses, - treason, sedition, rebellion, draft evasion, - and often conditioned upon their return to obedience and duty within a prescribed time. The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for many undocumented aliens already present in the country.

Included in the concept of pardon is "amnesty," which is similar in all respects to a full pardon, insofar as when it is granted both the crime and punishment are abrogated; however, unlike pardons, an amnesty usually refers to a class of individuals irrespective of individual situations. State v. Morris, 55 Ohio St.2d 101, 9 O.O.3d 92, 378 N.E.2d 708, 711.

163 posted on 03/26/2004 6:57:04 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Some of the things you list as credit for Bush are bad policies, such as the Medicare so-called reform, and instead of supporting another federal school so-called reform like the no child left behind Bush should be using the bully pulpit to get Americans on board for vouchers. Bush has done some good, but he hasn't taken on entrenched special interests such as both NEA's and unnecessary bureaucracy.

Let's put pressure on Bush to do cater to his conservative base in this election year. Otherwise, I fear, he will veer more to the left.
164 posted on 03/26/2004 7:24:57 PM PST by fatidic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
So it is ok for you, being a southerner, to spout stereotype about southerners?

I did not "spout stereotype about southerners." That is your demented and unlearned conclusion.

165 posted on 03/26/2004 7:25:26 PM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
That's a goal, and a worthy one. What will you do after that?

I will continue to vote. Every time. Like always.

166 posted on 03/26/2004 7:28:18 PM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Bookmark bump.
167 posted on 03/26/2004 7:32:49 PM PST by Bernard Marx (In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
There is only one issue in this fall's presidential election: the continued existence of the United States of America.

The sooner Republicans running for office or re-election practice that, the better off both they and we will be.

168 posted on 03/26/2004 7:44:47 PM PST by lewislynn (Free traders know it isn't , they just believe cheap popcorn makers raises their living standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
ab·ro·gate
(click to hear the word) (br-gt)
tr.v. ab·ro·gat·ed, ab·ro·gat·ing, ab·ro·gates
To abolish, do away with, or annul, especially by authority.

Even your definition agrees with my point. It isn't an amnesty, because the punishment is not abrogated, but rather it is reduced or simply changed.

Thanks for proving me right.

169 posted on 03/26/2004 8:12:18 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
"Glad to see that you are learning American history."

I know American history boy, I specially like the part where you stole Texas from Mexico.

170 posted on 03/26/2004 8:13:34 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
"With Free Trade every nation will work towards the collective best interests of All Nations and All Peoples."

No, that's your globalist, Marxist mentality.

Free trade is about people, not nations.

"Nations" are governments, and the only thing that governments can do effectively, is limit freedoms.

Were you a conservative, you would know these things, but you are a communist, so you don't.

Your argument is basically that since communist China limits the freedom of their citizens to freely trade, we should do the same.

171 posted on 03/26/2004 8:17:39 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
whose negotiating? I am saying the constitution party needs to understand we have a system that depends on two parties.

As long as the democrats are around, they are not significant. NOW if they worked to erasing the democrat party and then having national debates be between the Republican Party and Constitution Party, THEN we would be cooking with gas.
172 posted on 03/26/2004 9:07:39 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
It isn't an amnesty, because the punishment is not abrogated, but rather it is reduced or simply changed.

Perpetual reduction and simple change equals abrogation. If a criminal faces legal sanctions by virtue of the law he violates, and is released from those sanctions temporarily, with an option for renewal of that release, and eventual citizenship, his punishment has been abrogated by an amnesty.

I can't see any way around it, and you haven't shown me one. I can't say that I appreciate Clintonian word parsing by a republican (advertised as conservative) executive and legislature.

The only difference I discern between abrogation by definition and abrogation in fact is the number of steps.

173 posted on 03/26/2004 9:17:26 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
"Perpetual reduction and simple change equals abrogation."

You like pleying silly word games, don't you?

Abrogation means elimination, change means change.

Nice try

Are you writing for Kerry these days?

174 posted on 03/26/2004 9:19:11 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
"Abrogation means elimination, change means change."

And the law has not changed by the way, but the mode, the mechanism, and parameters of assessing penalties for disobeying the law have.

They have not been eliminated, they are simply different.

Nice try however.

Reducing the range of penalties allowed for conviction of a crime is in no way abrogating. Removing them altogether would be.

175 posted on 03/26/2004 9:24:42 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Someone needs to mail Mr. Taylor a crying towel.
176 posted on 03/26/2004 9:27:50 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
EXCELLANT POINT
177 posted on 03/26/2004 9:28:48 PM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Abrogation means elimination, change means change.

Abrogation implies instant result. Changes that inevitably end in that result is abrogation without instancy, but abrogation nonetheless.

However, in this case, abrogation does lead to instant result. Illegals that apply are not illegal anymore, and don't face the consequences of their crime. Abrogation.

178 posted on 03/27/2004 7:54:18 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
And the law has not changed by the way, but the mode, the mechanism, and parameters of assessing penalties for disobeying the law have. They have not been eliminated, they are simply different. Nice try however. Reducing the range of penalties allowed for conviction of a crime is in no way abrogating. Removing them altogether would be.

With the net result of abrogation of the crime; amnesty in fact. For those illegals that apply, they are no longer illegal. The laws against illegals don't apply to them.

They become a group that has had the consequences of their crime removed. They have been awarded amnesty. Amnesty in all other senses of the word means removing the subjects from the sanctions of a law. The law is still in effect, but the penalties thereof no longer affect them.

179 posted on 03/27/2004 8:00:43 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Pretty sad to be in a heads you lose, tails you lose, situation. Have you received alot of calls from the RNC asking you to listen to a recording of Delay or some other Republican, then asking if you are going to vote for Bush?

I have had three of them, and informed them that Bush is far too liberal for me to vote for. It's going to be strange for me to sit out an election, I have never missed one and have always voted Republican. Now I feel like Reagan, "I didn't leave my party, they left me".
180 posted on 03/27/2004 8:29:20 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson