Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doohickey
whose negotiating? I am saying the constitution party needs to understand we have a system that depends on two parties.

As long as the democrats are around, they are not significant. NOW if they worked to erasing the democrat party and then having national debates be between the Republican Party and Constitution Party, THEN we would be cooking with gas.
172 posted on 03/26/2004 9:07:39 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
...we have a system that depends on two parties.

That's because the system has been rigged by two parties to be that way. Third parties are also at a disadvantage because of the prevailing "they can't win" attitude of the electorate. I do plan on becoming involved with the Constitution Party after November. That won't keep me from voting for good Republican candidates, but it will keep my time and money away from a political party that is tacking ever leftward.

Most of us who are feeling disenfranchised by the Republican Party know the score, and will pull the lever for George W. Bush come November. At least, that's what I'll be doing. There's a lot to like about GWB - his "America first" foreign policy, national security, tax policy, some social issues...

Where we part ways is where he stands on domestic issues. Unilateral free-trade, CFR, illegal immigration, etc. He's not particularly strong on the 2nd amendment.

I do admire his honesty and integrity as well. Right or wrong, our President takes a stand on an issue and sticks with it.

199 posted on 03/27/2004 11:51:26 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson