Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miller: Agents of empire, The Lewis and Clark expedition (military officers serving American empire)
indiancountry.com ^

Posted on 03/26/2004 7:46:33 AM PST by chance33_98

Miller: Agents of empire, The Lewis and Clark expedition

Posted: March 22, 2004 - 10:27am EST by: Robert J. Miller / Associate Professor / Lewis & Clark Law School

Meriwether Lewis and William Clark rank high in the pantheon of American folk heroes. Even today, at the 200-year commemoration of their expedition, Lewis and Clark are viewed as brave adventurers who went where no one had gone before and explored and conquered the wilderness for the betterment of America.

There is another way, however, to view Lewis and Clark, which is closer to the truth. Lewis and Clark were military officers serving American empire - and Manifest Destiny - and were the vanguard of American legal doctrines and policies that ultimately robbed the indigenous peoples of just about everything they possessed. Historian Bernard DeVoto stated that "the dispatch of the Lewis and Clark expedition was an act of imperial policy." This imperialism was directed at the Indians and tribes that inhabited the Pacific Northwest and the Louisiana Territory.

The Lewis and Clark expedition was primarily concerned with Indian affairs from its inception. In January 1803, when President Jefferson sought an appropriation to fund the expedition, he told Congress that the United States could capture from England the lucrative fur trade with the Missouri River tribes and tribes clear to the Pacific Ocean. Then, when launching the expedition in June 1803, President Jefferson instructed Lewis to find the elusive Northwest Passage across the continent to use the route, in cooperation with Indian tribes, to greatly expand the American fur trade. Second, Jefferson wanted Lewis to establish commercial ties with the Indian nations in the Louisiana Territory. Third, Jefferson ordered Lewis and Clark to perform ethnographic studies of Indians and to gather information concerning tribal life, religion, territory, diplomatic relations and more. Finally, in January 1804, after the Louisiana Purchase, Jefferson added a new instruction and ordered Lewis and Clark to extend the United States’ sovereignty over the tribes in the newly purchased Louisiana Territory. Consequently, Lewis and Clark were American economic and diplomatic representatives spreading the news of the United States’ new role as the controlling government in the Territory after France sold the Louisiana Territory to the United States. They also told tribes and foreigners that Jefferson was now the "Great White Father" of all the Indian "children" and that the United States was exercising its sovereignty over the Territory.

The expedition, or "Corps of Discovery," operated under a European legal principle called the doctrine of discovery. This doctrine rationalized the domination and outright conquest of indigenous, non-Christian, non-white populations because it provided that the first European country that "discovered" new territory gained an interest in the natives’ property by becoming the sole entity eligible to buy their lands and the sole government that could deal diplomatically with the Native peoples. Thus, indigenous peoples lost some of their real property and sovereign governmental rights without their knowledge or their consent to the "discovering" nation. The doctrine recognized, however, that Native peoples retained occupancy and use property rights in their lands.

In 1823, in Johnson v. McIntosh, the Supreme Court recognized that the doctrine of discovery was American law. Much earlier, however, President Jefferson demonstrated his understanding of discovery, and his agreement with the principle, when he wrote that after buying the Louisiana Territory the U.S. had become its sovereign but that the purchase had not diminished Indian occupancy rights because the United States still had to buy the remaining property rights of the "native proprietors." Jefferson also showed his understanding of discovery when he sent Lewis and Clark beyond the Louisiana Territory into the Pacific Northwest. Jefferson did so to strengthen the United States’ discovery claim to the Oregon Territory before the English perfected their own claim. Jefferson had American empire in mind for the Pacific Northwest and for the Louisiana Territory, and he would not let the English nor the Indian tribes stand in his way.

As ordered, Lewis and Clark exercised American power and empire in the Louisiana Territory, and helped establish American discovery claims to the Pacific Northwest. First, they distributed "sovereignty tokens" consisting of American flags, military uniforms and Jefferson Peace Medals to important tribal chiefs. These "gifts" conveyed significant messages of American sovereignty and tribal allegiance to the U.S. Second, they informed everyone that President Jefferson was now the "Great White Father" of his Indian "children." Third, they organized visits of members of 26 tribes to Washington, D.C. to intimidate Indians with the immense size and power of the United States. Fourth, they tried to manipulate the political relationships of the tribes to facilitate American goals regarding hegemony and trade. Fifth, they pursued American commercial goals and consulted with tribes on the best locations for trading posts to bring tribes within the American economic sphere. They even promised to trade with tribes located outside the Louisiana Territory, which demonstrates further the "imperial" reach of the expedition to areas that were then outside the United States. Finally, Lewis and Clark performed recognized rituals to advance America’s discovery claims by leaving rosters of their men and announcements of their presence at the Pacific Ocean with the Clatsop and Chinook Indians, and by branding and carving their names on trees.

The actions of Lewis and Clark show that, ultimately, the subjugation of Indian property and commercial rights were the primary objectives of the expedition. The United States claimed its discovery sovereignty over the Louisiana Territory and made concrete plans to begin exercising that authority. The expedition was part of Jefferson’s plan to assimilate Indians and their assets into American society, to remove the Indian tribes from America’s path to continental expansion, and to exterminate Indians and tribes if necessary to advance American empire.

Thus, Lewis and Clark opened the road to the domination of Indian tribes and to bringing them and their lands into the American empire. Indians lost valuable property and governmental rights and were ultimately subjected to official federal policies of forced removals, assimilation, the reservation system, and the termination of tribal governmental status.

Robert J. Miller is an associate professor at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Ore., the chief justice of the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Court of Appeals, a citizen of the Eastern Shawnee tribe of Oklahoma, and is currently writing and speaking about the Lewis & Clark expedition and its interactions with the Indian nations.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; lewisandclark; rewrittinghistory
Auto Barf engaged.
1 posted on 03/26/2004 7:46:33 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Wow.

We owned the land. Every bit as much as we owned Pennsylvania or Virginia or any other land.

History is full of peoples who lost land because they were not strong enough to hold on to it. The Romans lost their empire. The British lost their empire. The Persians lost their empire.

Guess the indians are in good company. Deal with it.

2 posted on 03/26/2004 7:50:56 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
The Lewis and Clark expedition was primarily concerned with Indian affairs from its inception

I don't know if I agree with this, as Jefferson stated to L&C that he wanted to find an all-water route to the Pacific. Yes, he wanted to bring Indians into the American trading circle, but that was done, in part, to cut foreign powers out of the fur trade.

3 posted on 03/26/2004 7:51:17 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Guess the indians are in good company. Deal with it.

Good point. Indian nations were in a struggle on the Great Plains for years. They fought each other. They did this long before white folks were in the area. I mention this last sentence, because I've seen mentioned that Indian on Indian violence did not begin in earnest until the white man came to trade and supplied some nations with firearms.

4 posted on 03/26/2004 7:55:29 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Brave warrior, let him go live in tepee, kill own game, smoke own kinnikinnick, then talk big.
5 posted on 03/26/2004 7:56:14 AM PST by T'wit (Liberals are always wrong, even when they come down on both sides of the issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Bump
To read later
6 posted on 03/26/2004 7:57:59 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Space Available for Rent or Lease by the Day, Week, or Month. Reasonable Rates. Inquire within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Before Indians were running casinos and selling cigarettes tax-free in North America, they were a stone-age people before the "pale face" came. They had not learned to domesticate animals, they had no written language, they used only stone tools and they had not even yet invented the wheel.

They had never seen a horse, a metal knife, a cart or a plow.

They also commonly practiced slavery, genocide and cannibalism against other tribes. No matter how many times you watch "Dances with Wolves" and "Pocahontas," it will not change these facts.

Most inidan tribes also sided with the British during the Amrican Revolution.
7 posted on 03/26/2004 8:00:10 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Casino revenue must be down.
8 posted on 03/26/2004 8:02:50 AM PST by MadJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Most inidan tribes also sided with the British during the Amrican Revolution.

A true statement, but it doesn't go far enough.

In terms of population percentage loss, the worst war we ever fought was King Philip's War in 1688. King Philip was an indian chief (also known as Metacomet). The indians burned down whole villages. I had a relative (infant) murdered in his cradle. The Colonists' population was small in 1688 and a good percentage of that population was killed in the war. The indians lost the war.

The Indians sided with the French in the French And Indian War (1753). The indians lost the war.

The indians sided with the British in the Revolution. The indians lost the war.

The indians sided with the British again in the War of 1812. The indians lost the war.

As the Americans moved west, fighting was constant on both sides. The indians started quite a few (but not all) of the fights. The indians lost everytime.

The judgement of history is merciless.

9 posted on 03/26/2004 8:10:11 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I didn't realize the indians lost as many wars as the french.
10 posted on 03/26/2004 8:18:42 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Idiot.

The alternative to American conquest and occupation of the West was not perpertual Indian freedom, it was conquest and occupation by some other modern power.
11 posted on 03/26/2004 8:28:40 AM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Ya. So what's his point?

I love how they take warp every single US move as being somehow insidious. Substitute 'states' for 'Indians' and you'll see that the US still does all of these things and more to 'exercise American power and empire ....

First, they distributed "sovereignty tokens" ....conveyed significant messages of American sovereignty and tribal allegiance to the U.S.

This is now called pork. The Federal government hands out billions of dollars to the states every year in return for 'allegiance' to Federal rules.

Second, they informed everyone that President Jefferson was now the "Great White Father" of his Indian "children."

Does 'It Takes A Village' ring a bell? We are all treated like children by the Federal Gov't.

Third, they organized visits of members of 26 tribes to Washington, D.C. to intimidate Indians with the immense size and power of the United States.

Our governors and state representatives make annual trips to the meca at D.C.

Fourth, they tried to manipulate the political relationships of the tribes to facilitate American goals regarding hegemony and trade.

Clearly it is still a primary goal of the Federal government to manipulate the political relationship between regions of the US, if not between states themselves, to facilitate American goals for trade.

Fifth, they pursued American commercial goals and consulted with tribes on the best locations for trading posts to bring tribes within the American economic sphere. They even promised to trade with tribes located outside the Louisiana Territory, which demonstrates further the "imperial" reach of the expedition to areas that were then outside the United States.

The US negotiates with states over trade and labor. The US also promises to bring trade to the states from nations located outside the US.

Finally, Lewis and Clark performed recognized rituals to advance America’s discovery claims by leaving rosters of their men and announcements of their presence at the Pacific Ocean with the Clatsop and Chinook Indians, and by branding and carving their names on trees.

Military bases. Federal courthouses. National Guard.

How is this any different than today???

12 posted on 03/26/2004 9:07:25 AM PST by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson