Posted on 03/25/2004 7:18:18 PM PST by Roscoe Karns
As the American political system negotiated its way through Richard Clarke Week, there is one overarching political lesson: the national media monolith manufactures the "news" any way it desires, a crude daily sculpting of political Silly Putty. It can make someone a household name. It can leave someone utterly unknown in Idaho.
Richard Clarke Week was the latest widget of propaganda from the liberal-media assembly line, designed with an extremely partisan purpose -- destroying whatever polling advantage George W. Bush enjoys on protecting the nation from terrorism.
Ask this question: if this previously obscure Richard Clarke had come out with a book in March of 2000 arguing that the Clinton administration was soft on terrorism, would he have received a similar parade of encomiums (and soon, honorariums)? Would his remarks have been received as a refreshingly independent voice raising serious questions that must be seriously answered by a negligent President Clinton?
Answer: No stinking way.
Why not? Because the liberal-media establishment, starting with the New York publishing houses and then trickling onward to the networks and national print kings, never had any interest in books which could prove damaging to President Clinton. Richard Clarke couldnt count on "60 Minutes" or Simon & Schuster to make him a millionaire back then. (Simon & Schuster is well-known as the long-time publishing home of Hillary Clinton, as well as James Carville.)
Any Clinton administration insider who pondered a tell-all book knew that the probable reception at the end of the tunnel was at worst, complete obscurity with all your bridges burned. At best, youd get a serious media beating as a disloyal snake, with all your bridges burned.
The exception to this rule was George Stephanopoulos, but he was far too famous to be relegated to obscurity when his memoir "All Too Human" came out in March of 1999. If his long stint as a paid liar for President Clinton hadnt made him famous, ABC News certainly had already invested several years into making him "Objective" News Man. But he still was hammered as a disloyal fink. In her interview, Katie Couric suggested he was "creepy," a "Linda Tripp type," who was betraying those people who made him, which is "sorta gross."
A better example of the serious-media-beating principle is Gary Aldrich, the former FBI agent assigned to Clinton White House security, who wrote the best-selling book "Unlimited Access" for the conservative Regnery house. Aldrich received one TV interview on ABCs "This Week," in which conservative George Will ripped him up one side and down the other. (The next segment was Clinton aide Stephanopoulos ripping the author up and down.) Intense White House pressure caused Aldrich to be dropped from scheduled bookings on ABCs "Nightline," NBCs "Dateline," and CNNs "Larry King Live."
Showing hes still good with a bald-faced lie, Stephanopoulos insisted on "Good Morning America" that no White House had never mobilized before Richard Clarke Week to challenge an authors credibility with such intensity: "On a book? No, never. Its never happened before." Shame on ABC for putting that ridiculous notion on the air without correction.
Lets examine a more recent example of how a disloyal Democrat is received. In mid-October 2003, former Clinton HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo performed publicity for his new book "Crossroads," a compilation of liberal and conservative pieces he edited. He appeared in tepid interview sessions on Fox with Bill OReilly, on MSNBC with Joe Scarborough, and on NPR with Tavis Smiley.
A week later, the New York Posts Fred Dicker noticed that Cuomos introduction was a blazing attack on the Democratic establishment. Democrats lost elections in 2000 and 2002 because "we were lost in time...To voters, we seemed bloodless, soulless and clueless." Young Cuomo was especially harsh on September 11. Democrats "fumbled the seminal moment of our lives -- the terrorist attacks of 9/11." While Bush "exemplified leadership....on the Democratic side, there was chaos. We handled 9/11 like it was a debate over a highway bill instead of a matter of people's lives."
The media could have made it Andrew Cuomo Week. Instead, Cuomos book introduction received a very supine TV silence. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN did zilch. Chris Matthews mentioned it in passing on MSNBC, and Foxs Sean Hannity and Brit Hume each noticed for a minute. But days later, no one could remember these passages ever being published.
This is how 2004 is unfolding with our partisan press. Every week is a Bush-bashing week. Theres Paul ONeill Week. Theres National Guard Dental Records Week. Theres 9-11 Ad Bad Taste Week. Theres Richard Clarke Week. Wont it be deeply funny when we get to November and the voters revolt at the transparent liberal bias, and it ends up being Bushs Re-Election Year?
We just hope he is right. Was it Hitler or Stalin or one of their followers who said that if you tell a lie often enough, it will be believed?
I have that very same experience with the sheeple here in liberal Connecticut. It's incredibly sickening.
Clarke: Terrorism Wasn't High Bush Priority
Washington - Seven days before Sept. 11, 2001, then-White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke was so alarmed at the threats posed by al-Qaida that he urged administration colleagues to imagine a terrorist attack that left hundreds of Americans dead, it was disclosed Wednesday...
*barf!*
If his mouth is open, he's lying.
It's sickening, isn't it? The media is obviously in the tank for Kerry. Tomorrow's papers will all have his interpretation of Bush's WND joke at the correspondents' dinner. Never mind that the dinner happened the night before, and none of the reporters at the event seemed to think it was that big a deal at the time, or it would have garnered huge headlines yesterday. But since Kerry is outraged, it's become a big deal! How transparent can you get?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.