1 posted on
03/25/2004 5:53:42 AM PST by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Liberal journalists have no interest in facts.
2 posted on
03/25/2004 5:58:10 AM PST by
Galtoid
To: SJackson
If they are not lying, they are just not reporting.
3 posted on
03/25/2004 6:01:55 AM PST by
Piquaboy
To: SJackson
I contacted the Washington Post ombudsman, and I suggest those who find the LAT,WP and NYT coverup outrageous do that same--
To: SJackson
What do you expect from a media that is outraged over Joe Scalia hunting with the vice president and want him to recuse himself from any case that involves the VP. Meanwhile they evidently dont notice that justice Ginsberg gives money to a group that regularly argues cases in front of her.
6 posted on
03/25/2004 6:04:33 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Aye, fight and you may die, run, and you'll live...at least a while)
To: SJackson
All the eyewitnesses agree that Kerry argued vociferously against Camil's plan dubbed "the Phoenix project" and orally resigned from the VVAW because the murder plot was given serious consideration. Ummmm....WRONG.

John Kerry Watching Nixon on Television
John Kerry, a Vietnam vet and head of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, watches as President Nixon announces an agreement on a cease fire in Vietnam. Kerry, who lost to Republican Paul Cronin (D-Mass) in the November general elections said, "my initial reaction is thank God that the prisoners are coming home and that we at least have stopped American participation in the war."
© Bettmann/CORBIS
Date Photographed: January 24, 1973
Location Information: Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
To: SJackson
"Since Kerry was on the side of the angels in the debate, and Sens. John Tower (R-Tex), John Stennis (D-Miss) and Strom Thurmond (R-SC) may have had their lives prolonged because of him,..."You see? He IS a hero! Did I mention the Silver Star, Bronze Star and the 3 Purple Hearts acquired while serving deep in the jungles of VietNam?
But Frank, those were EGG SHELL fragments!!!
8 posted on
03/25/2004 6:07:26 AM PST by
Hatteras
To: SJackson
Let's see.
Committed treason and perjury during the "winter solder" hearing, assuming he lied. If not, then he committed war crimes himself while in Vietnam.
Conspiracy to assassinate members of the senate, then actively covering it up.
Admits to meeting with leaders of North Vietnam, during wartime, while holding a commission in the Naval Reserve, also an act of treason.
Man, I feel so much safer now that Martha Stewart is going to the pokey for lying to the Feds.
11 posted on
03/25/2004 6:12:48 AM PST by
dinasour
To: SJackson
To Democrats, this is a resume enhancer. Of course, if a similar story came out about a Republican candidate, that candidate would already have withdrawn from the race in disgrace, hustled out as fast as possible by howling and screaming Democrats.
To: SJackson
Perhaps Kerry felt some voters would look askance at his leadership role in an organization that would seriously contemplate assassination, or was worried that voters would think him remiss for failing to report to the authorities that there were some in the VVAW who were plotting murder. More likely, he doesn't want to alienate and drive into the Nader camp those left-wing voters who think he should have approved the plan.
To: SJackson
Perhaps Kerry ... was worried that voters would think him remiss for failing to report to the authorities that there were some in the VVAW who were plotting murder. Meanwhile, Kerry's Kampaign Kamp is busily looking for the "hero" medals he got for reporting the plot.
They've heard that the medals are in mothballs in an attic...somewhere... in one of his many homes.
15 posted on
03/25/2004 6:20:38 AM PST by
syriacus
(Clarke and Kerry found courage to speak out when they knew Dems would give them the Capitol mike.)
To: SJackson
Is the author of this article the same Jack Kelly who was drummed out of USA Today for fabricating articles?
Michael
18 posted on
03/25/2004 6:26:19 AM PST by
Wright is right!
(It's amazing how fun times when you're having flies.)
To: SJackson
That nasty, out of control FBI, watching people just because they've threatened to kill American political leaders. There won't be any more of that in a Kerry administration. ...and who are today carrying on that legacy by harassing and intimidating poor, peaceful, innocent Moose Limbs, who, like Kerry, are only trying to make the world a better place.
There won't be any more of that, either, in the Kerry administration.
21 posted on
03/25/2004 6:28:27 AM PST by
dinasour
To: SJackson
*BUMP*!
22 posted on
03/25/2004 6:31:53 AM PST by
ex-Texan
To: SJackson
If Kerry were irritated with Camil for having proposed assassination, his ire faded over the years. Camil told the Lipscomb that he plans to accept an offer from the Florida Kerry organization to become active in Kerry's presidential campaign.
A volunteer position or a well-paid one, I wonder?
To: SJackson
With the evidence mounting that he had indeed been at the Kansas City meeting, Kerry changed his story. Who'da thunk it? The old flip flopper is at it again. Just like el dicko clarke changed his story, and the media reports what they want us to hear.
26 posted on
03/25/2004 7:06:25 AM PST by
Arrowhead1952
(Most democRATs live in a world of fiction and fantasy!)
To: SJackson
If Kerry's memory is so deficient, he should refrain from prevaricating.
29 posted on
03/25/2004 7:14:22 AM PST by
monocle
To: SJackson; All
30 posted on
03/25/2004 7:14:53 AM PST by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: SJackson

Since Kerry was on the side of the angels in the debate, and Sens. John Tower (R-Tex), John Stennis (D-Miss) and Strom Thurmond (R-SC) may have had their lives prolonged because of him, it is unclear why Kerry would choose to lie about his participation in it. Perhaps Kerry felt some voters would look askance at his leadership role in an organization that would seriously contemplate assassination, or was worried that voters would think him remiss for failing to report to the authorities that there were some in the VVAW who were plotting murder.
Because as recently released FBI files "clearing" Kerry and the VVAW of links to violent activity now prove, they could have only been cleared of those links if Kerry failed to inform the authorites of the Senatorial Assassination plot. Or, maybe Senator Kerry doesn't want questions raised about the shooting of Senator John C. Stennis outside his the latter's home on January 30th, 1973?
|
33 posted on
03/25/2004 8:52:31 AM PST by
Sabertooth
(< /Kerry>)
To: SJackson
bttt
35 posted on
03/25/2004 3:37:26 PM PST by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson